Abstract
Decision-making and strategies to improve service delivery need to be supported by reliable health data to generate consistent evidence on health status, so the data quality management process must ensure the reliability of the data collected. Thus, through an integrative literature review, the main objective of this work is to identify and evaluate digital health technology interventions designed to support the conduct of health research based on data quality. After analyzing and extracting the results of interest, 33 articles were included in the review. This transdisciplinarity may be reaching the threshold of significant growth and thus forcing the need for a metamorphosis of the area from focusing on the measurement and evaluation of data quality, today focused on content, to a direction focused on use and context
In general, the main barriers reported in relation to the theme of research in the area of health data quality cite circumstances regarding a) use, b) systems and c) health services.. The resources presented can help guide medical decisions that do not only involve medical professionals, and indirectly contribute to avoiding decisions based on low-quality information that can put patients’ lives at risk
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) - grant no. 2020/01975-9 – as part of the project “Digital health for the End TB strategy: from linked data integration to a better evidence-based decision making”, coordinated by author D.A.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos