Abstract
A closer examination of consumer product brands and how they are associated with levels of potential endocrine disrupting chemicals should be explored. The large number of brands available and changes in consumer preferences for certain brands makes it difficult to develop questionnaires that include all brands. Open-ended brand reporting questions are an option, but they bring challenges in identifying each brand given the multiple possibilities of variations in brand name reporting. We report a method for transforming product brand data reported as text to brand codes that allows quantitative analysis of brand use and its association with endocrine disrupting chemicals. We selected 14 consumer products to be included in our analyses. To evaluate commonly used brand selection, we used Cohen’s power calculations for two-sample t-tests in R (version 1.3.0). Considering a moderate effect size (Cohen’s d) of 0.5, each test will include the most used brand and the least used brand among the commonly used brands per product and visit. We compared how the commonly used brand selection differ per product in terms of the number of brands it selected, the total sample size and the power calculated by creating a correlation matrix and analyzing the relationship between power, commonly used brands, and brand usage. The correlation coefficient between the commonly used brand frequency of each visit approximated 0.99. From all products, fabric softener, conditioner, and lotion where the products that attained the highest power. The differences in brand use distributions per product provided an optimal environment for evaluating the performance of the commonly used brand selection methodology. It provides enough flexibility when selecting exposure groups that it could be applied to any open-ended questions, and it proves significantly useful when accounting for repeated measures.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
AA: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P42ES017198) https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/centers/srp/funding/rfa/index.cfm AA:Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (5UH3OD023251) https://www.nih.gov/research-training/environmental-influences-child-health-outcomes-echo-program AA and NRCC: Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (3UH3OD023251-05S1)https://www.nih.gov/research-training/environmental-influences-child-health-outcomes-echo-program No, the funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Board of the University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Board of the University of Michigan gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Board of the University of Georgia gave ethical approval for this work. The Institutional Review Board of the Northeastern University gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
