Abstract
A continuously time-varying transmission rate is suggested by many control-theoretic investigations on non-pharmaceutical interventions for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic. However, such a continuously varying rate is impossible to implement in any human society. Here, we significantly extend a preliminary work (M. Fliess, C. Join, A. d’Onofrio, Feedback control of social distancing for COVID-19 via elementary formulae, MATHMOD, Vienna, 2022), based on the combination of flatness-based and model-free controls of the classic SIR model. Indeed, to take into account severe uncertainties and perturbations, we propose a feedback control where the transmission rate, i.e., the control variable, is piecewise constant. More precisely, the transmission rate remains constant during an appreciable time interval. Strict extended lockdowns may therefore be avoided. The poor knowledge of fundamental quantities such as the rate of infection hinders a precise calibration of the transmission rate. Thus, the results of our approach ought therefore not to be regarded as rules of action to follow accurately but as a guideline for a wise behavior.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
cedric.join{at}univ-lorraine.f
alberto.d'onofrio{at}units.it
Michel.Fliess{at}polytechnique.edu
{cedric.join{at}alien-sas.com, michel.fliess{at}alien-sas.com,}
1 Two weeks in our computer simulations.
2 Computer experiments.
3 They considerably improve [Fliess et al.(2022)].
4 The notation
below, in Equation (1), stands for the time derivative of the time function x(t). The notation in Equation (2) designates the second order deribative.5 Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered/Removed
6 Contrarily to [Fliess et al.(2022)], we do not start with R* (0) = 0.
7 Contrarily to [Fliess et al.(2022)], the scenarios below do not necessarily start at the beginning of the epidemic.
8 This time lapse is of course too short in practice. It has been chosen in order to have enough points for our numerical analysis.
9 As a consequence, this is an obstacle to the implementation of the vast majority of theoretical control strategies in epidemiology, even for the remarkably different problem of vaccination awareness campaigns (see [Della Marca & d’Onofrio(2021)]).
10 This inefficiency includes the techniques employed in [Fliess et al.(2022)] where the assumed knowledge of I is unrealistic.
Data Availability
All the data are available in the paper
