Sex differences in depression and sleep disturbance as inter-related risk factors of diabetes

Data set and variables

We used the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) National Health Interview Survey Data, 2018, of 21,229 participants. The data were collected by random sampling of 35,000 U.S. households and random selection of one adult and one child (if any) from each household for interview. We restricted the sample to those 18 years or older as children and adolescents demonstrate sleep patterns and durations different from those of adults. We intended to generalize the current findings to non-institutionalized adult population of the United States.

The variables in our analytics included a binary response (dependent) variable indicating whether an individual has diabetes (the IPUMS data set did not distinguish between type I or II of diabetes). Independent variables included 1) the average number of self-reported hours of sleep per night over the prior month in four categories: ≤ 5, 6-7, 7-8, and >8 hours; 2) the frequency an individual experiencing depression over the prior year in three categories: never/rarely, monthly, and often (more often than monthly); and 3) sex: males and females. Covariates included age (in years), race (Caucasian, black/African American, Asian, or Native American/Alaska Native), income, body mass index (BMI), and level of physical activity (PA). Household income was categorized into low (annual family income < $35,000), middle (between $35,000 and $75,000), and high (> $75,000). The variable measuring PA was created using the Oncology Nursing Society formula for weekly leisure activity score, derived from the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire. The data for ‘light exercise’ were not available and thus substituted with the data on strength-related exercise. Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample.

Statistical analysis

Multivariate logistic regression

We used binomial logistic regression to predict binary outcome (presence/absence) of diabetes using an optimized model [15]. The variables of interest included sex, depression frequency (depression), and nightly hours of sleep (sleep), and the covariates included age, race, household income (income), BMI, and PA.

We first performed a multivariate logistic regression to include all predictors (sex, frequency of depression, and nightly duration of sleep) and covariates (age, race, BMI, PA, and income) in the model. We checked for the statistical significance of the model; further, the three predictors and five covariates showed a significant relationship with diabetes and thus were all included in the model (see Results).

Next, we examined the continuous variables (age, BMI, and PA) for linearity in relation to the logit of the outcome. The results showed that age, BMI and PA were all linearly related to diabetes in logit scale (Figure 1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

Scatter plots with locally weighted scatter plot smoothing (LOWESS) of the relationship between probability of diabetes (in logit scale) and continuous covariates (age, BMI, PA, respectively). All relationships were linear.

Multivariate logistic regression

Table 2 shows the results of multivariate logistic regression. For nightly hours of sleep, we used the category of 7-8 hours as the baseline; for depression frequency, we used “never/rarely” as the baseline; for sex, we used men as the baseline; for race, we used Caucasian as baseline; and, finally, for income, we used “low” income as the baseline. Depression reported at a higher frequency and sleep duration either longer or shorter than 7-8 hours both significantly contributed to the odds of a diagnosis of diabetes.

Model fit according to BIC and AIC

Although the BIC and AIC values were close across models, the two best models were Model 1 and 2, according to both criteria (Table 3):

Model 1: Diabetes = depression + sleep + sex + sex × depression + age + BMI + PA + race + income, with a BIC value of 3443.46 and AIC value of 3308.09

Model 2: Diabetes = depression + sleep + sex + sex × sleep + age + BMI + PA + race + income, with a BIC value of 3454.89 and AIC value of 3311.56

Hosmer and Lemeshow’s goodness of fit revealed non-significant difference between predicted and observed frequencies (Model 1: p=0.792; Model 2: p= 0.342) with Hosmer-Lemeshow χ² = 4.68 (Model 1) and 9.00 (Model 2), respectively, indicating a good fit for both models.

Discriminatory power of Model 1 and 2

In ROC analysis both model 1 and 2 demonstrated excellent discriminatory power distinguishing the presence vs. absence of diabetes, with an area under curve (AUC) = 0.86 (Figure 2). In the plot of sensitivity and specificity versus probability cut-offs, the sensitivity and specificity curves crossed at a point close to the vertical axis, indicating adequate sensitivity and specificity of the fitted models [19].

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2.

Sensitivity vs. specificity plot (left panels) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (right panels) of (A) model 1 and (B) model 2.

The effects of depression and sleep on the probability of diabetes and their interaction with sex

To visualize the effects of depression frequency and nightly sleep duration on the probability of diabetes, we plotted predictive margins of response (outcome: diabetes) versus predictor in Figure 3A and 3B. Overall, as revealed by logistic regression (Table 2), more frequent experience of depression was positively related to diabetes risk. On the other hand, nightly sleep hours were associated with diabetes risk in a U function; duration more or less than 7-8 hours was both associated with a higher risk.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3.

Predicted margins of diabetes with 95% confidence intervals with respect to (A) depression frequency, (B) nightly sleep hours, shown separately for males and females, and (C) depression at each level of sleep. Men relative to women showed stronger associations between depression frequency and nightly sleep hours with the probability of diabetes. Further, reduced/increased sleep hours in synergy with higher frequency of depression predicts higher probability of diabetes.

To examine whether depression frequency and nightly sleep duration may interact to determine diabetes risk, we obtained predictive margins of the interaction effect on diabetes probability using Model 1 (Figure 3C, Supplementary Table S2). For each level of sleep hours, diabetes probability increases with more frequent depression in the same manner. Sleep levels ≤5 hours and >8 hours shared similar, highest probability of diabetes at each level of depression, followed by the probability associated with 6-7 and 7-8 hours of sleep, the latter with the least probability of diabetes.

Further, the effects of depression frequency and nightly hours of sleep interacted with sex in predicting diabetes. The effects of depression and sleep disturbance contributed to diabetes more significantly in men than in women (Table 4). Specifically, at each level of depression, diabetes probability was higher in men than in women: rarely/never depression [coefficient (SE), odds-ratio (SE), p-value in women with men as reference: -0.35 (0.13), 0.70 (0.09), 0.006], monthly depression [-0.86 (0.37), 0.42 (0.15), 0.019], “often” depression [-0.68 (0.21), 0.50 (0.11), 0.001].

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 4.

The effects of depression and sleep interaction with sex on the probability of diabetes (Model 1 and 2)

Similarly, at each level of sleep hours, probability of diabetes was greater in men compared to women: sleep < 5 hours [coefficient (SE), odds-ratio (SE), p-value: -0.52 (0.25), 0.59 (0.15), 0.042], 6-7 hours [-0.62 (0.21), 0.53 (0.11), 0.003)], 7-8 hours [-0.32 (0.16), 0.73 (0.12), 0.053], and >8 hours [-0.55 (0.24), 0.57 (0.14), 0.023].

Sleep disturbance and depression as risk factors of diabetes

We found that, relative to 7 to 8 hours of nightly sleep, both shorter (< 5 hours) and longer (> 8 hours) sleep were associated with an odds ratio of 1.6 of having a diagnosis of diabetes. A systematic review of 36 studies showed that sleep disturbances significantly impact diabetes risk, with the effects comparable to family history of diabetes and overweight and exceeding the risk associated with physical inactivity [1]. A meta-analysis of 13 independent cohorts with a total of 107,756 male and female participants and 3,586 cases of type 2 diabetes reported that both short and long sleep duration was associated with the likelihood of diabetes, although the underlying mechanisms may be different [3]. There is a relatively strong consensus in the literature that short sleep duration (< 6 hours) is a significant risk factor of diabetes [1,20–22]. Insufficient sleep and poor sleep quality may contribute to diabetes and/or hamper treatment via physiologic mechanisms such as insulin resistance, decreased leptin/increased ghrelin, and tissue inflammation as well as behavioral mechanisms, including elevated food intake, smoking, drinking and sedentary behavior, all disposing individuals to both obesity and diabetes [23]. Indeed, sleep as a crucial survival-related behavior, is regulated through the hypothalamic circuits, and investigators have specifically linked shortened or disturbed sleep to higher cortisol levels, leading to both increased glucose production, decreased glucose utilization, and eventually insulin resistance [20,24]. Short sleep may also increase levels of the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein, which inhibits physiological function of leptin and contributes to weight gain and impaired glycemic control [3,24]. Although less conclusive, a few studies have also shown excessively long sleep (>8 hours) as a risk factor for diabetes [4,14]. In a two-year prospective study individuals whose sleep duration increases ≥2 hours per night are at an enhanced risk of diabetes [25]. Prolonged sleep elevates inflammatory markers similarly to shortened sleep, resulting in dysfunctional regulation of leptin and food intake [14]. As sleep disturbance is associated with poor glycemic control, optimizing sleep may improve overall diabetes management [26].

On the other hand, some have cautioned that the relationship between sleep and diabetes may be accounted for by other confounding or risk factors. Indeed, both shorter and longer than normal sleep has been documented as core symptoms of depression [27–31]. Higher rates of depression have been consistently found among those diagnosed with diabetes and vice-versa, indicating a bidirectional etiological relationship [28,32,33]. One prospective study of U.S. military members in the Millenium Cohort Study found that, after controlling for baseline covariates, the relationship between depression and diabetes appeared to be insignificant [20]. However, distinct demographics and life experiences of enlisted servicemen might have contributed to these contrasting results. Here, we found that both altered sleep duration and depression were associated with greater odds of a diabetes diagnosis. In particular, the regression models with interaction between sleep and depression did not provide a better fit, suggesting that sleep hours and depression frequency contributed to diabetes risk in a concerted manner. Further, as discussed in detail in the next section, although men relative to women demonstrated a more significant association of both depression and altered sleep hours with the diagnosis of diabetes, both showed a similar pattern of the two risk factors in relation to diabetes. The latter findings suggest an inter-related mechanism by which depression and sleep disturbance contribute to diabetes.

Sex differences in sleep disturbance and depression as risk factors of diabetes

The effect of sleep on diabetes risk has also been found to vary between sexes. A systematic search of 10 studies found a higher diabetes risk for men sleeping less than 5-6 hours per night, as compared to women [3]. The afore-mentioned study of U.S. military service members reported that, whereas non-depressed women were more likely to be diagnosed with diabetes than non-depressed men, this discrepancy became insignificant when both women and men had depression [20]. Further, Hein et. al, reported that among adults with major depression, only male sex was a significant risk factor for diabetes [28]. Thus, the current finding that aberrant sleep duration – whether too short or long – might impact the risk for diabetes in men more significantly than in women is consistent with this literature. On the other hand, because women as compared to men were more likely to experience and report depression [8], we hypothesized a stronger association between depression and diabetes in women than in men. One possibility for the current finding is a ceiling effect of depression masking the relationship between depression and diabetes in women. However, our data did not support this hypothesis, as women did not appear to show more severe depression in the current data set.

The exact mechanism behind this sex-specific association is not clear. But it should be noted that disturbed sleep has been shown to interfere with testosterone production in men with type 2 diabetes. Given the benefits of testosterone on glucose metabolism, deficient sleep might conceivably lead to poorer glycemic control [34]. Further, given the nature of self-report in the current data, the relationship between sex, depression, and diabetes remains to be investigated [33,35]. Studies with objective measures of glycemic control and sleep quality and duration would be particularly useful in addressing this question.

Limitations and conclusions

A number of limitations should be considered. First, the data comprised self-reported measures, including sleep duration and subjective experience of depression. Further, as no medical measure of the severity of diabetes was available, the status of diabetes was investigated as a categorical variable. The quality of the data set thus presents a major limitation and the current findings would need to be replicated. Second, these were cross-sectional, observational data; thus, we cannot draw any causal inferences from the current findings. Future studies in a controlled and longitudinal setting ought to examine the direction of the relationship between diabetes, sleep, and depression and how the relationships vary between males and females.

To conclude, the study supports a potential sex-related association between depression frequency and nightly sleep duration and diabetes risk and adds to rapidly growing literature linking mental and physical health. Our findings that both short and long sleep and depression elevate the odds of diabetes support an inter-related rather than independent mechanism of depression and sleep disturbance as risk factors of diabetes. This diabetes risk appears to be stronger in men than in women, suggesting the need of more research to understand sex-specific physiological and psychological processes underlying the care and management of those with or at risk of diabetes.