Article Information
History
- June 1, 2022.
Article Versions
- Version 1 (May 16, 2022 - 09:49).
- You are viewing Version 2, the most recent version of this article.
Copyright
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Author Information
- Lauren Towler1,2,*,†,
- Paulina Bondaronek3,4,*,
- Trisevgeni Papakonstantinou3,5,
- Richard Amlôt6,
- Tim Chadborn3,
- Ben Ainsworth7,8,* and
- Lucy Yardley1,2,*
- 1School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, SO17 1BJ
- 2School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, BS8 1TU
- 3Office for Health Improvement & Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, London, United Kingdom, SW1H 0EU
- 4Institute for Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom, NW1 2DA
- 5Department of Experimental Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, WC1H 0AP
- 6Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom, SE1 8UG
- 7Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom, BA2 7AY
- 8National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, SO17 1BJ
- ↵†LT is corresponding author. Correspondence to lbt1g14{at}soton.ac.uk
Posted June 01, 2022.
Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyse large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: Comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques
