Extending the German Corona Consensus Dataset (GECCO) to the immunization, pediatrics, and cardiology domains

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented strong efforts in connecting nationwide and international research to help in managing the disease and its effects on public health. To enable research across different health care providers, institutions or even countries, interoperability between the medical data systems is essential [1]. Therefore, early in the pandemic, the German Corona Consensus Dataset (GECCO) has been developed in a collaborative effort to provide a standardized, unified core dataset for inter-institutional COVID-19-related patient research [2]. The GECCO dataset specifies a set of 81 essential clinical data items from 13 domains such as anamnesis & risk factors, symptoms, and vital signs, that have been selected by expert committees from university hospitals, professional associations, and research initiatives. The selected data items were mapped to international standard vocabularies such as the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) and Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC). The Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard was used to specify the interoperable data exchange format for the GECCO data items. Since its development, the GECCO dataset has been implemented in a large number of institutions, most notably in virtually every German university hospital, which now provides access to the GECCO dataset in the context of the German COVID-19 Research Network of University Medicine (“Netzwerk Universitätsmedizin”) [3].

The GECCO dataset was developed to contain as many relevant data items as possible, but few enough to keep the effort of implementing the dataset manageable. Therefore, the dataset contains mostly data items of general research interest, excluding data items that are only of interest for particular medical specialties or use cases. These data items are considered part of domain-specific extensions to the GECCO dataset introduced in this article.

We here introduce three domain-specific extensions of the GECCO dataset that cover COVID-19-related research data items relevant to the medical specialties of immunization, pediatrics, and cardiology. These extensions use the same international health IT standards and terminologies as the GECCO dataset and were developed in close alignment with the GECCO dataset to ensure interoperability and compatibility with existing definitions. We describe the iterative, consensus-based data item selection and data format definition process that was performed in close collaboration between medical experts from immunology, pediatrics, and cardiology domains on the content definition side and medical information specialists and FHIR developers on the technical side. This process may serve as a blueprint for further development of consensus-based data set definitions.

Construction and Contents

Selection of data items

The content of the domain-specific GECCO extension modules was defined by medical domain experts in a transparent process (Figure 1). The involvement of the medical domain experts as the end-users of the data to be provided ensured that the contents of the extension modules are aligned to the actual research needs. In the context of the national pandemic cohort net (“Nationales Pandemie Kohorten Netz”; NAPKON) project of NUM [4], so-called subject- and organ-specific working groups were established by the voluntary association of medical experts from different medical fields. Each of the subject- and organ-specific working groups elected a board, and all communication between the GECCO extension module developers and the working groups was organized and carried out via the working groups’ board. In preparation for the GECCO extension modules, the subject- and organ-specific working groups for immunology, pediatrics, and cardiology were invited to provide up to 50 data items with up to 10 response options each that were of particular interest to their field concerning COVID-19-related research. If necessary, more data items or response options could be provided in coordination with the GECCO extension module developers. The provided data items were then reviewed by the GECCO extension module developer team and a first definition of the contents of the extension module was returned to the respective subject- and organ-specific working group for approval or change requests. After approval by the subject- and organ-specific working group, the definition of the extension module was considered finalized. Note that for the immunization extension module, physicians from the “NUM-COVIM” study for the determination and use of SARS-CoV-2 immunity [5] assumed the role of the organ-specific working group, as no such working group had been established previously.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

Flowchart of the consensus-based, interdisciplinary dataset definition and mapping process for the GECCO extension modules.

Utility and Discussion

We here present three extension modules of the GECCO dataset that contain data items relevant for COVID-19-related patient research in the immunization, pediatrics, and cardiology fields. The data items are represented in HL7 FHIR profiles and use international terminologies, to ensure a harmonized, standardized, and interoperable dataset definition for these medical domains. The provision of data according to the dataset definitions introduced in this article will enable cross-institutional and cross-country data collection and collaborative research with a particular focus in immunization, pediatrics, and cardiology.

We have implemented an interdisciplinary, iterative, consensus-based process for the selection of data items and the development of the dataset definition. The close collaboration and the constant feedback loops with domain experts from the respective medical specialties right from the beginning of the project, as performed here, are key for the successful development of a useful dataset definition. Indeed, since the selection of relevant data items was driven by the end-users of the dataset, who are the researchers that later will be using the data for their specialized areas of research, the semantic usability of the datasets is guaranteed. Likewise, having medical information specialists develop the formal dataset specification ensures technical interoperability and usability of the dataset definition.

Next to the successful development of dataset definitions, several factors determine a successful deployment or use of the developed dataset definitions. First and most importantly, clear and concise documentation of how to implement and provide data using the dataset definition is required. For FHIR-based dataset definitions, so-called implementation guides are used to provide both a narrative overview as well as deep technical details on the dataset definition. Thus, we have created and published implementation guides for each of the here-developed GECCO extensions modules. Second, the example implementations of the dataset definitions serve as a blueprint for developers and data engineers who implement the dataset definitions for their clinical databases. From our experience with the implementation of the GECCO dataset, well-defined example data items may be of equal if not higher importance than the technical description of the dataset specification, as developers and engineers tend to use the examples as blueprints for their implementation. Thus, we equip every FHIR profile defined in the extension modules with at least one example. These examples are incorporated and issued within the implementation guides of the modules. Specifically, we aimed to provide one example for each different category of response option per profile. Thirdly, the actual implementation of the dataset definitions should be part of follow-up infrastructure projects to supply funding and resources for filling the dataset definition with actual data. For the GECCO dataset, this is ensured by follow-up projects of the German COVID-19 Research Network of University Medicine (“Netzwerk Universitätsmedizin”), such as CODEX+, which includes several implementation tasks that are actively using the GECCO dataset items. Fourth, once the dataset definitions are implemented and leveraged in use cases, additional demands to the dataset are likely raised or issues with existing definitions are revealed. The maintenance of existing definitions (e.g., performing technical corrections or even evolving the definitions or adding new items) is, therefore, necessary and must be organized and funded. Last, successful use of the dataset definitions is also highly dependent on the degree of interoperability of the definitions in the first place. For example, several data items of the here presented extension modules were at first specified in a questionnaire-like fashion and direct implementation of these as Questionnaire resources in FHIR would limit the applicability of such data elements, especially when aiming to map these items from an electronic health records (EHR) system. In such cases, we revised the data item specification, wherever possible, in close collaboration with the medical domain experts to be able to map them to interoperable concepts, and we recommend not to use Questionnaire/QuestionnaireResponse profiles in cases where the information to be represented can be modeled using more general and therefore interoperable concepts and FHIR resources.

Conclusion

We here introduce the development process and the resulting dataset definitions of extension modules for the German Corona Consensus (GECCO) dataset, expanding the original GECCO dataset into the immunization, pediatrics, and cardiology domains. We have defined and implemented a process in which interdisciplinary teams of medical domain experts, medical information scientists and FHIR developers closely collaborate in an iterative, consensus-based fashion for the successful development of useful and interoperable dataset definitions. This process may serve as a blueprint for further dataset definition projects, such as further GECCO extension modules. The dataset definitions described in this work have been validated and published. Their implementation and active use are anticipated in the context of current nationwide COVID-19 research networks in Germany.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

The NAPKON (“Nationales Pandemie Kohorten Netz”, German National Pandemic Cohort Network) project is funded under a scheme issued by the Network of University Medicine (Nationales Forschungsnetzwerk der Universitätsmedizin (NUM)) by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)) grant number 01KX2021.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to the development of the datasets. GL, TH, SB, LR, JS, AB, ST performed terminology mapping, FHIR profiling and critical review of the concept and resource mappings. TH, SB, LR defined the datasets in ART-DECOR. DH, FK, LES, FB, FE, NT, RB, AF, MD developed and compiled the list of data items for the extension modules. SR, LL and MU coordinated the project and the consensus finding process within and between working groups. JJV, CvK, ST conceived the work. GL drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.