Abstract
The standard-of-care (SOC) diagnostic prenatal testing includes a combination of cytogenetic methods such as karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and chromosomal microarray (CMA) using either direct or cultured amniocytes or chorionic villi sampling (CVS). However, each technology has its limitations: karyotyping has a low resolution (>5Mb), FISH is targeted, and CMA does not detect balanced structural variants (SVs) or decipher complex rearrangements in the genome. These limitations necessitate the use of multiple tests, either simultaneously or sequentially to reach a genetic diagnosis. This long-standing prenatal testing workflow demonstrates the need for an alternative technology that can provide high-resolution results in a cost and time-effective manner. Optical genome mapping (OGM) is an emerging technology that has demonstrated its ability to detect all classes of SVs, including copy number variations (CNVs) and balanced abnormalities in a single assay, but has not been evaluated in the prenatal setting. This retrospective validation study analyzed 114 samples (including replicates), representing 94 unique and well-characterized samples that were received in our laboratory for traditional cytogenetic analysis with karyotyping, FISH, and/or CMA. Samples comprised 84 cultured amniocytes, and 10 phenotypically normal and cytogenetically negative controls. Six samples were run in triplicate to evaluate intra-run, inter-run, and inter-instrument reproducibility. Clinically relevant SVs and CNVs were reported using the Bionano Access software with standardized and built-in filtration criteria and phenotype-specific analysis. OGM was 100% concordant in identifying the 101 aberrations that included 29 interstitial/terminal deletions, 28 duplications, 26 aneuploidies, 6 absence of heterozygosity (AOH), 3 triploid genomes, 4 Isochromosomes, 1 translocation, and revealed the identity of 3 marker chromosomes, and 1 chromosome with additional material not determined by karyotyping. Additionally, OGM detected 64 additional clinically reportable SVs in 43 samples. OGM demonstrated high technical and analytical robustness and a limit of detection of 5% allele fraction for interstitial deletions and duplications, and 10% allele fraction for translocation and aneuploidy. This study demonstrates that OGM has the potential to identify unique genomic abnormalities such as CNVs, AOHs, and several classes of SVs including complex structural rearrangements. OGM has a standardized laboratory workflow and reporting solution that can be adopted in routine clinical laboratories and demonstrates the potential to replace the current SOC methods for prenatal diagnostic testing. We recommend its use as a first-tier genetic diagnostic test in a prenatal setting.
Competing Interest Statement
RK has received honoraria, and/or travel funding, and/or research support from Illumina, Asuragen, QIAGEN, Perkin Elmer Inc, Bionano Genomics, Agena, Agendia, PGDx, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cepheid, and BMS. NSS owns limited number of personal stocks of Bionano Genomics Inc. ARH, and AC are salaried employee at Bionano Genomics Inc. All other authors have no competing interests to disclose.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the IRB A- BIOMEDICAL I (IRB REGISTRATION #00000150), Augusta University. HAC IRB # 611298. Based on the IRB approval, the need for consent was waived; all PHI was removed, and all data was anonymized before accessing for the study.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All relevant data is included in the manuscript and supplementary files
