The maternal anthropometry and hemoglobin status in relations to newborn birth weight among primiparous mothers at Adama Hospital Medical College, Eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study

Background

Anthropometric measurements are quantitative assessments of human body size and are used to assess the nutritional status of humans. Commonly used anthropometric parameters in pregnant mothers include height, weight, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), and foot length (1). It is a simple, inexpensive, and non-invasive approach used to identify mothers at risk of labor outcomes (2).

Researchers have used many methods, ranging from a simple measurement of maternal height to some advanced methods such as clinical or radiological pelvimetry (3). Maternal height results from the interaction of the genetic materials for growth with early-life conditions, whereas maternal weight and MUAC reflect recent nutritional status before or after conception (4). Tallness is generally considered to be advantageous, particularly concerning childbirth. Although women are genetically shorter than men, they have larger pelvic dimensions. Stature is found to be significantly related to several pelvic indices (5)..

The maternal body frame is the key determinant of neonatal anthropometry, predominantly birth weight and length, which are linked to perinatal morbidity and mortality (6). Birth weight is the major predictor of an infant’s growth and survival and is mostly affected by the mother’s health and nutritional status before conception and throughout pregnancy. It is classified as normal birth weight, low birth weight, and macrosomia (7).

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines low birth weight as a weight at birth of less than 2,500 grams, regardless of gestational age (8). It leads to stunted growth, a higher risk of mortality and morbidity, affects organ development, and a higher risk of chronic disorders in later life (7). This represents the main cause of child mortality and morbidity. Its consequences are not only limited to early life stages but also happen during adulthood. There is increasing evidence that children born with LBW have poor developmental outcomes (9).

During pregnancy, an increase in plasma volume exceeds the increase in red cell volume, which causes a physiological hemodilution, resulting in a reduced hemoglobin concentration (10). Maternal anemia is one of the common hematological disorders that may occur during pregnancy and is associated with fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, which also accounts for 20% of maternal deaths in developing countries (11).

Anthropometry and the hemoglobin status of mothers are important factors that influence birth weight; in turn, weight at birth is related to neonatal outcomes (12). Low birth weight (LBW) is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in Africa (13). Infants weighing less than 2,500 grams are 20 times more likely to die than bigger babies, and low birth weights contribute to poor health outcomes (14). Low birth weight continues to be a major public health problem globally and is associated with a variety of both short and long-term outcomes. Low birth weight (LBW) is estimated to account for 15% to 20% of all births worldwide, which accounts for more than 20 million births a year. Based on the report of WHO, the regional estimates of LBW include 9% in Latin America, 28% in South Asia, and 13% in sub-Saharan Africa (15). And in Ethiopia, the national pooled prevalence of low birth weight (LBW) was 17.3% (16)

Globally, 528.7 million (29.4%) women of reproductive age have hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations of less than 11 g/dl. Rates of low hemoglobin are highest in low-resource countries, especially in central and western Africa, where 48% of reproductive-age women and 56% of all pregnant women are reported to have low hemoglobin (18). Maternal low hemoglobin constitutes a major public health problem in developing countries. Maternal anemia in pregnancy is common and has several deleterious effects on the health of the mother and the fetus, and is an important risk factor for low birth weight (LBW) (19). Several studies conducted in various parts of the world found that maternal anthropometry and hemoglobin status are important factors influencing labor outcomes. Understanding the relationship between maternal anthropometry and hemoglobin status with newborn birth weight aids in enforcing early management and follow-up in order to prevent both short and long-term complications. Besides, this study provides information on the associations between maternal anthropometry and hemoglobin status with the newborn birth weight among primiparous mothers at Adama Hospital Medical College.

2.1. Study area and period

The study was conducted at Adama Hospital Medical College (AHMC) from September 15 to October 30, 2021. The hospital is one of the tertiary and teaching hospitals in the Oromia region, 99 km east of Addis Ababa. AHMC was constructed by American Mennonite missionaries in 1946. It is serving over five million catchment populations and is a referral site for neighboring zone and regions such as part of Amhara and Afar regions. There are 11 obstetricians, 39 obstetrics and gynaecology (OB/GYN) residents, and 46 midwives who are currently providing maternal and child health (MCH) related services. Based on the report of the AHMC record liaison office, there were about 9054 pregnant mothers who gave birth at AHMC in 2013 E.C. Among these, 4022 were primiparous, and on average, about 335 primiparous gave birth each month at AHMC.

2.2. Study design

An institutional-based cross-sectional study design was conducted at AHMC.

2.3. Population

2.4. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

2.5. Sample size determination

The sample was determined using the formula for single population proportions, taking proportions of 0.21 of low birth weight under the assumption of a 95% confidence interval (Z=1.96) and a margin of error of 0.05 (31). Hence, the number of deliveries at the hospital in 2013 EC was 9054, which is less than 10,000. The sample size correction formula was applied, and finally, after accounting for a 10% non-response rate, the sample size was 273. Where:

n= minimum sample size required for the study

Z (α/2)2 = standard normal distribution (Z=1.96), CI of 95% = 0.05

P= proportion of low birth weight 0.21 (31)

d=Absolute precision or tolerable margin of error= 5 %(0.05)

2.6. Sampling technique

A consecutive sampling method was used to collect the data during the study period. All primiparous mothers presented for delivery who met the inclusion criteria were consecutively recruited until the required sample size was attained.

2.7. Operational definitions and definition of terms

2.8. Data Collection Methods

2.9. Data processing and analysis

The data was checked for completeness manually and entered into the EpiData version 3.1 software package. For further analysis, the data was exported to the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 21 software. A descriptive analysis was performed for each of the independent variables, and the results were presented in the form of tables and graphs. The data was fitted with binary logistic regression. Bivariable analysis was done to test for the relationship between dependent and independent variables and model fitness was checked by using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test. The variance inflation factor (VIF) was used to test for multicollinearity. The logistic regression results were presented as adjusted odds ratio (AOR). Finally, those variables with a P-value of less than 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval in the multivariable analysis were considered statistically significant predictor variables of the birth weight. All variables were entered into a multivariable binary logistic regression analysis to identify factors independently associated with birth weight.

2.10. Data quality management

To assure the quality of the data, one-day training was given for data collectors on the objective of the study, inclusion and exclusion criteria, contents of the questionnaires, procedures for anthropometric measurements, and ethics during data collection. The collection of data was checked by the investigator daily for any incompleteness and/or inconsistency. A pre-test was done to assess the understanding level of the data collectors and the integrity of the questionnaire among 5% (14) of the sample size at Adama General Hospital Medical College. Each questionnaire was identified by the ID code given to it.

2.11. Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance to conduct the study was obtained from the Jimma University Institute of Health’s Institutional Review Board with a reference number of IHRPGS/521/2021. A written letter of permission for data collection was provided to Adama Hospital Medical College administrative office, department of obstetrics and gynecology. All data collectors who participated in the study were recruited by staff working in the obstetric ward while simultaneously conducting their routine duty in the hospital.

The study title, purpose, procedure, duration, possible risks, and benefits of the study were clearly explained to the study participants. Then, individual written informed consent was taken from the respondents, and they were assured of confidentiality by excluding their names during the period of data collection. They were informed that they have the full right to refuse to participate and/or withdraw from the study at any time if they have any difficulty. Regarding newborns in which LBW was diagnosed; communication with the midwives in charge was made for further assessment and management. Prevention of COVID-19 was considered by wearing personal protective equipment and applying necessary infection prevention techniques during all steps of data collection.

3.1 Maternal socio-demographic characteristics

A total of 269 primiparous mothers and their newborn neonates participated in this study, which yields a response rate of 98.5%. Table 2 presents the socio-demographic characteristics of primiparous mothers who gave birth at Adama Hospital Medical College. The mean of maternal age was 23.95±3.42. More than three forth 210 (78.1%) of the participants were urban in their place of residence. Besides, about four in ten mothers 115 (42.7%) had a secondary level of education. Nearly about eight in ten 224 (83.3%) mothers were unemployed. According to this study, more than half 144 (53.5%) of the participants had at least four ANC visits. (Table 1)

The distribution of newborn sex among neonates delivered at Adama Hospital Medical College. Out of the total neonates who participated in this study, 159 (59.1%) were male and 110 (40.9%) were female. (Figure 1). And Out of the total newborns who participated in this study, 215 (80%) had birth weights greater or equal to 2500g and 54 (20%) had birth weights less than 2500g. (Figure 2)

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Sex of newborn among neonates delivered by primiparous mothers at Adama Hospital Medical College 2021 (n=269)

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:

Birth weight status among newborns delivered by primiparous mothers at Adama Hospital Medical College 2021 (n=269)

3.2 Mean of maternal characteristics in association to birth weight of newborns

Table 2 shows the mean comparison of maternal characteristics in association with the birth weight of neonates at Adama Hospital Medical College. In comparison to the mothers who delivered neonates with a birth weight of less than 2500g, mothers who delivered neonates with a birth weight greater than or equal to 2500g had a higher mean of maternal age, maternal foot length, maternal height, maternal weight, maternal MUAC, and maternal hemoglobin. (Table 2)

3.3 Independent predictors associated with low birth weight (LBW)

To identify the association between low birth weight (LBW) and predictive variables, bivariable binary logistic regression analysis was first done for all independent variables. Table 6 presents independent predictors associated with low birth weight (LBW) at Adama Hospital Medical College. All important variables were entered into the multivariable binary logistic regression by ‘ENTER METHOD’. Model fitness was checked by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test. Accordingly, the result was 0.713 for maternal characteristics and newborn sex in association to birth weight, and then the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis showed maternal height, maternal hemoglobin status, and maternal ANC visit of less than two were associated with low birth weight (LBW).

When compared to mothers who had four or more ANC visits, primiparous mothers with fewer than two ANC visits increased the occurrence of low birth weight (LBW) by 4.149 [AOR = 4.149, 95% CI: (1.27, 13.52)] folds. As maternal height increased by one unit, the likelihood of low birth weight (LBW) decreased by 12.2% [AOR = 0.878, 95% CI: (0.806, 0.95)]. Besides, the odds of having a low birth weight (LBW) were 4.127 [AOR = 4.127, 95% CI; (1.63, 10.43)] times higher among primiparous mothers with Hgb<11g/dl compared to mothers with Hgb ≥11g/dl. (Table 3).

Recommendations

Based on the study findings, the following recommendations were forwarded for the policy makers, national, regional and zonal health bureaus, for health care workers, and researchers. Maternal anthropometry is a very useful tool in identifying mothers at risk of labor outcomes. Therefore, routine measurements of maternal anthropometry and hemoglobin during an ANC visit. Community-level health education should be provided for women of childbearing age regarding the association between maternal anthropometry and hemoglobin level with labor outcomes. Longitudinal studies in multicenter with larger sample sizes that incorporate pelvic diameters are needed. A community-based study is recommended during which anthropometric parameters like weight can be taken before pregnancy and followed up throughout the pregnancy.

Limitation of the study

Anthropometric measurements such as maternal weight are more reliable before conception. However, in our environment, women commonly present to health facilities only when they are advanced in pregnancy and there may be no record of their pre-pregnancy weight. This study was conducted in a single center and used a relatively small sample size. Another limitation of this study is we didn’t measure Pelvic diameter (pelvimetry).