ABSTRACT
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has shed light on the fractures of healthcare systems around the world, particularly in relation to the healthcare workforce. Frontline staff have been exposed to unprecedented strain and delivering care during the pandemic has impacted their safety, mental health and wellbeing. Rapid Research methods and big qualitative data offered a unique opportunity to gain insight into perceptions and experiences during this time.
Objective The aim of this paper was to explore the experiences of Health Care Workers (HCWs) delivering care in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic to understand their wellbeing needs, experiences and strategies used to maintain wellbeing at individual and organizational levels.
Methods We analysed 94 telephone interviews with HCWs and 2000 tweets about HCWs mental health during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic applying Collaborative and Digital Analysis of Big Qualitative Data in Time Sensitive Contexts (LISTEN).
Results Results fell under six themes: redeployment, clinical work, and sense of duty; wellbeing support and HCW’s coping strategies; negative mental health effects; organisational support; social network and support; and public and government support. Redeployment generated anxiety mainly due to limited prior training and risk assessments, and the barriers of adapting to a new working environment while wearing PPE. HCWs struggled to access wellbeing support due to time constraints. In terms of ill mental health, mentions of feelings of trauma, PTSD and anxiety were prominent. HCWs’ mental health was particularly affected by the copious amount of bad news on media and at home and the fear of infecting their loved ones.
Conclusions These findings demonstrate a need for open conversations, where staff wellbeing needs and the strategies they adopted can be shared and encouraged, rather than implementing solely top-down psychological interventions. At the macro level, findings also highlighted the impact on HCW’s wellbeing of public and government support, as well as the need for ensuring protection through PPE, testing, and/or vaccines for frontline workers.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study did not receive external funding. Research costs were covered with existing funding provided by the Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London. All researchers acted independently from the funding source and can take responsi- bility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. This study was approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA) in the UK (IRAS: 282069) and the local Research and Development Offices (R&D) where the study took place. All participants provided consent before taking part.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
the results and discussion were worded out more precisely and clearly.
Data Availability
Data included in this study is not available outside the Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL) due to ethical guidelines restrictions.
Abbreviations
- HCW
- Health Care Worker
- PPE
- Personal Protective Equipment
- SPICE
- Recovery Model of Social recovery, Prosperity, Individual recovery and Clinical recovery experience
- RREAL
- Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab
- LISTEN
- Collaborative and Digital Analysis of Big Qualitative Data in Time Sensitive Contexts
- HRA
- Health Research Authority
