Abstract
Prompt communication of critical laboratory results is important for patient safety. Various standardisation bodies have proposed procedures for handling critical results, with notification parameters outlined. However, few studies exist in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) to document how critical results are handled. We tracked 12 types of laboratory tests over a three-week period in December 2018 and documented if and how critical test results were communicated, the time-frame for communication, and evidence of action taken on the results. During the period, 331 of 5,500 (6.1%) test results were identified as critical. Only 71 (21%) of the critical results were documented as having been communicated to the destination departments. Of the communicated results, clinicians were unaware of 21 (29.6%). Of the 12 test types, critical results were only communicated for three tests namely: potassium, haemoglobin and positive malaria tests. Communication of critical results to inpatient settings was significantly higher than to outpatient settings (p <0.05), with communication rates decreasing as the week progressed, during weekends and around holidays. The observed poor communication of critical results in an LMIC setting raise significant patient safety concerns. Laboratories in these settings need to adhere to international standards, like ISO 15189:2009, to assure safe practice. Training of staff, establishment of standard operating procedures guiding these results, and implementation of fail-proof critical result dissemination mechanisms are essential. It is important that all critical results are communicated within one hour of availability. Implementation of Order Entry and Laboratory systems should be highly considered.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
TM - Funder - Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, http://mtrh.go.ke. TM, MW, TT Grant: Norad: Project QZA-0484 Funder: Norwegian Programme for Capacity Development in Higher Education and Research for Development (NORHED) - URL: https://norad.no/norhed The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The research was approved by two research ethics bodies in Kenya and Norway: 1. Institutional Research and Ethics Committee of Moi University College of Health Sciences and Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital. Approval Number 0001634 2. Norwegian REK - Regionale Komiteer For Medisinsk OG Helsefagug Forskningsetikk - Exemption Reference 2017/2501/REK
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Footnotes
↵* thomasmwogi{at}mtrh.go.ke (TM)
Data Availability
The data underlying the results presented in the study are available from the Author or through access to the REDCap database (https://research.kenyamedicine.info) - registration is free and approval to the project will be done through a request on the home page after registration.
