ABSTRACT
Background As “stay at home” orders were in effect, many US food workers attended in-person work during early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic, charged with maintaining normal operation of the national food supply chain. Despite establishment of a novel national paid sick leave policy, anecdotal evidence suggests that many U.S. food system workers encountered barriers to staying home when ill.
Methods Using quantitative and free-text analyses from a national, cross-sectional, online survey deployed from July to October 2020 among 2,535 respondents, we explored workplace and non-workplace factors associated with U.S. food system workers’ intentions to attend work while ill (i.e. presenteeism intentions) during the first four to six months of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results Overall, 8.8% of workers surveyed reported intentions to attend work while ill. Both quantitative data and free-text responses suggest that aspects of workplace culture influenced workers’ decisions to attend work while ill. Workers reporting a high workplace safety climate score had half the odds of reporting presenteeism intentions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37, 0.75) relative to those reporting low scores. Workers described cultural barriers, including retaliation and penalties, that reduced paid sick leave access. Workers reporting low (aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.35, 3.13) or very low (aOR 2.31, 95% CI 1.50, 3.13) levels of household food security had twice the odds of reporting presenteeism intentions.
Conclusions This study offers insights into opportunities for reducing presenteeism related to illness among food workers both during the COVID-19 pandemic and in other infectious disease scenarios. Addressing vulnerabilities like food insecurity and empowering food system workers to make health-protective decisions is important both for optimal worker health outcomes and maintaining a functioning food system.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by a Directed Research Grant from the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future. Additional funding was provided by the Johns Hopkins Education and Research Center Pilot Project Research Program and the Wini Hayes Student Research Fund. CAC was supported by a Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future-Lerner Fellowship and a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health training grant (T42 OH0008428). The funders had no role in study design; data collection, analysis, or interpretation; or decision to publish.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional Review Board of The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health gave ethical approval for this work / considered this study exempt (category 2) from oversight (IRB No. 12549).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: This research was funded by a Directed Research Grant from the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future. Additional funding was provided by the Johns Hopkins Education and Research Center Pilot Project Research Program and the Wini Hayes Student Research Fund. CAC was supported by a Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future-Lerner Fellowship and a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health training grant (T42 OH0008428). The funders had no role in study design; data collection, analysis, or interpretation; or decision to publish.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
