Abstract
Introduction Ventriculostomy related infection (VRI) or ventriculitis is a common and serious complication related to the placement of an external ventricular drain. Numerous sets of diagnostic criteria for VRI have been reported. We sought to estimate the variation in the incidence of VRI in a cohort of patients according to published diagnostic criteria.
Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study. We included adult patients admitted to the Neuroscience intensive care unit with traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) who required an EVD. We estimated the incidence of VRI according to published diagnostic criteria. We compared the incidence to clinicians’ diagnoses of VRI. The primary outcome was the estimated incidence of VRI.
Results There were 190 study participants, median age (interquartile range) of 58 (48 - 72), 106 (55.8%) were female. Admitting diagnoses was ICH in 30 (15.8%), TBI in 49 (25.8%) and SAH in 111 (58.4%) of cases respectively. There were 158 (83.2%) who required mechanical ventilation for a median of 6 (2-13) days. There were 29 (15.3%) who were treated for VRI by clinicians, with 6 (3.2%) having a positive culture. Variation in the diagnostic criteria led to an estimated incidence of VRI that ranged from 1 (0.5%) to 178 (93.7%).
Conclusion In this critically ill cohort, the estimated incidence of VRI varied widely depending on which diagnostic criteria for VRI were applied. A comprehensive, consistent, objective and universal set of diagnostic criteria for ventriculostomy related infection is needed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval to conduct the study was obtained from the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (RESP/18/339).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data produced in this study are available upon reasonable request to teh authors
