Abstract
Background With the recent ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic and political divide in the United States (US), there is an urgent need to address the soaring mental well-being problems and to promote positive well-being. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) measures the positive aspects of mental health. Previous studies confirmed its construct validity, reliability, and unidimensionality with confirmatory factor analysis. Four studies have performed a Rasch analysis on the WEMWBS, but none of them tested adults in the US. The goals of our study are to use Rasch analysis to validate the WEMWBS in the general US population and in adults with stroke.
Methods We recruited community-dwelling adults and adults with chronic stroke with upper limb hemiplegia or hemiparesis. We used the Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model (RUMM) 2030 software to evaluate item and person fit, targeting, person separation reliability (PSR), and differential item functioning (DIF) for sample sizes of at least 200 persons in each subgroup.
Results After deleting two items, the WEMBS analyzed in our 553 community-dwelling adults (average age 51.22±17.18 years; 358 women) showed an excellent PSR=0.91 as well as person and item fit, but the items are too easy for this population (person mean location=2.17±2.00). There was no DIF for sex, mental health, or practicing breathing exercises. In the 37 adults with chronic stroke (average age 58±13; 11 women) the WEMWBS had a good item and person fit, and PSR=0.92, but the items were too easy for this group as well (person mean location=3.13±2.00).
Conclusions The WEMWBS had good item and person fit but the targeting is off when used in community-dwelling adults and adults with stroke in the US. Adding more difficult items might improve the targeting and capture a broader range of positive mental wellbeing in both populations. Our pilot data in adults with stroke needs to be confirmed in a larger sample size.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The research was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences grant UL1TR002494. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The studies were approved by the University of Minnesota's Institutional Review Board (IRB# STUDY00005849 and STUDY00000821) and they were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data are deposited on the Data Repository for the U of Minnesota (DRUM).
List of abbreviations
- WEMWBS
- Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale
- SWEMWBS
- Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale
- RUMM
- Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model
- UBACC
- University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent
- PSR
- Person separation reliability
- DIF
- Differential item functioning
- PCAR
- Principal components analysis of residuals
