Using Facebook groups to support families: midwives’ perceptions and experiences of professional social media use

Introduction

There is a high level of public demand for responsive, evidence-based online health services [1] and the potential for these to improve care and increase efficiency is well documented [2]. Despite strategic emphasis on the digital transformation of the NHS, progress remains slow, particularly within maternity services [3]. However, digital technology was quickly utilised by services to play a vital role in disseminating information and communicating with families in response to the outbreak of COVID-19 [4], and work is needed to evaluate and maintain advances [3].

The popularity of Facebook support groups with pregnant and new mothers has grown rapidly in line with the increasing social media use amongst this demographic [5]. This use of peer-led online communities offers access to shared experience and social and emotional support that women find invaluable during the transition to parenthood [6]. However, whilst highly valuing them for social support, they encounter issues with whether the health information shared within online groups has any credible evidence base [7]. Inaccuracy and the sharing of misinformation within online groups is common which can heighten anxiety and increase help seeking from professionals [8,9]. Professionally mediated support offers a solution: facilitating peer support, relationship building and knowledge acquisition within an online community whilst addressing any inaccurate or misleading information [10]. Mothers seek this online support from midwives, and it improves their experience of midwifery care, and feedback on local maternity services [11].

Engagement on social media by NHS health professionals, to inform and empower service users, has been deemed critical for over a decade [12,2]. To facilitate this, sectors like pharmacy and dentistry have seen a growth in research into the issues surrounding digital professionalism [13,14]. The skills and professionalism required by nurses engaging online has more recently been explored [15,16], and training introduced to pre-registration programmes [17]. However, there is reluctance amongst midwifery educators to adopt such programmes [18]. Limited research suggests perceptions of the risks amongst midwives, and a lack of training present significant barriers to developing social media support more widely in maternity services [19,16].

The provision of midwife moderated Facebook groups offers maternity services an opportunity to develop support and health engagement, improving outcomes and experiences [20,11]. However, little is known about how midwives perceive and experience this form of communication and support, and no literature has been identified that explores any training or support offered to midwives related to this developing role. This study therefore aimed to explore midwives’ and student midwives’ attitudes towards, and any experiences of, delivering support to mothers via Facebook. Developing an understanding of barriers to developing this provision will help inform practice and education, supporting midwives to engage safely and effectively with digital support services. Specifically, the study sought to explore:

1. How are midwives using Facebook and what are their perceptions of professional social media use?

2. What are midwives’ experiences of, and concerns about offering social media support?

3. What training needs relating to social media and breastfeeding support do midwives have?

Results

Discussion

This study explored midwives’ and student midwives’ (referred to in the discussion jointly as ‘midwives’) attitudes toward, and experiences, of using Facebook to provide midwifery support. A growing body of research shows that women expect health services to use digital tools for support and communication, and that social media has the potential to improve these services [22,2]. Our study explored the barriers to this provision within maternity services, from the perspective of midwives. Consistent with other research [19,16], the findings show midwives are concerned about the risks of offering support to pregnant and new mothers online and seek more training and guidance to do so. However, those delivering support via Facebook viewed the role and its impact positively and had fewer concerns, despite a lack of guidance and resources. These findings have important implications for developing the guidance and support to safely deliver progress in utilising social media as a professional tool.

Seeking support on Facebook during pregnancy and early parenting is now widespread and has a wide range of benefits for mothers. Facebook support groups offer convenient access to highly valued social and emotional peer support, increasing confidence, knowledge acquisition and self-efficacy [23]. Midwives recognised that many mothers are now using Facebook in this way but were also aware that mothers have issues with recognising reliable information, and that the sharing of unhelpful, and, in some cases risky, advice is a common experience [8]. Our findings showed that many midwives saw midwife-moderation as a solution to validating information in Facebook groups, which is reflected in the literature [10]. However, others felt that this created or may create opportunities to undermine individual midwife-mother relationships and for mothers to challenge those providing their clinical care. This was not the experience of those actually involved in Facebook support, who viewed interactions as positive for mothers, midwives and services. These findings are important for considering how to incorporate midwives’ experiences into training that addresses concerns and supports service development.

Belonging to a Facebook support group provides mothers with a support network and access to lived experience that is not always available to them within their local community. Groups that offer support to mothers located within specific geographic areas enable ‘real life’ connections to be built, fostering relationships that create social opportunities for mothers and babies and facilitating signposting to face to face support when needed [11].\ These mothers also have shared experiences of their maternity services and expect to receive updates and offer feedback on their care via social media. Midwives had mixed experiences of this, sharing the boost to morale of appreciation and positive engagement, but also the impact of negative interactions, particularly in the context of changes related to COVID-19 [24]. Faced with inaccuracies, judgement or criticism about maternity care or services on Facebook midwives felt disempowered, and that they were did not have the guidance or support to engage constructively. These negative experiences on Facebook in general impacted midwives’ attitudes towards Facebook support, despite not being seen in midwife-moderated groups [10]. Previous research found access to midwife moderated groups improved perceptions of midwifery support, improving feedback and experiences, including during the pandemic [25]. Findings suggest training should be developed to support professional and constructive interactions which promote positive relationships between families and services.

There was a consensus amongst midwives that relevant skills and knowledge training was lacking and would be useful, particularly in relation to digital professionalism. Midwives are socialised through their education and practice to understand what is expected of them [26], and the standards they must uphold to register, and remain registered, with the NMC [27]. This extends to online behaviours and interactions [28], and although midwives felt they were confident in staying professional online, they were less so about maintaining boundaries and how to ensure confidentiality. This underpinned midwives’ fears that engaging online could prompt complaints and referral to their employer or the NMC, despite this being highly infrequent [18]. Universities were also seen as unsupportive; student midwives reported being warned against social media use during their education and felt frustration at defensive rather than proactive approaches. Previous research has noted resistance to introducing digital professionalism to the midwifery curriculum [18]. These findings are a concern, highlighting that midwives are often not receiving the support or training needed, pre- or post-registration, to meet digital transformation goals.

Although health professionals have long been encouraged to engage with service users on social media [12] midwives felt prevented from doing so by local policies and a lack of employer support. This is in line with previous research, which identified that whilst NHS strategy calls for greater engagement, professionals are discouraged by a focus on security and reputation [29]. Many midwives perceived any interaction with mothers on Facebook as inappropriate and unprofessional and most felt NMC [30] social media guidance did not support midwives to provide Facebook support. This reflects the generic referencing within the guidance of relationship building as unprofessional and inappropriate, despite improved relational continuity being a key benefit of midwife moderated Facebook groups [20]. These findings are important to consider in relation to the development of online support services, updating training and policies to reflect national strategy and the evidence base supporting this provision.

Midwives involved in providing support experienced improved connections with mothers and providing continuity as personally fulfilling, as well as recognising the benefit of continuity to mothers’ wellbeing and pregnancy outcomes [31]. Midwives felt their knowledge had increased as a result of being involved in moderating an online community, learning from mothers’ questions and experiences. Health professional moderators commonly report increased learning and research opportunities, and that the role can be personally and professionally empowering [32]. Midwives in the personal use only group were less likely to perceive these benefits, or the potential for engaging online to support continuing professional development. Findings suggest this may be a missed opportunity and that widening access to midwife moderator roles would benefit individuals and services.

Midwives expressed fears for their own privacy, security and a desire to avoid blurring boundaries between personal and professional online space. Social media use requires energy and cognitive processing that can cause overload and fatigue [33], and additional professional use may increase these risks, creating anxiety, stress and rumination [34,35]. There was concern about differentiating between being ‘on’ and ‘off’ duty when an online workplace is accessible around the clock and carried in a pocket. They feared becoming emotionally involved and overstepping boundaries. Some shared experiences of midwives being identified or targeted on Facebook, or having information they had shared taken out of context, creating fear this would occur in a group setting. However, these concerns were significantly associated with those not already involved in offering support, indicating that group formats and guidelines can support mutually respectful interactions [20]. Notably, around a third of those offering support online had concerns about doing so, suggesting their belief in the benefits motivated them to manage their concerns/accept a level of perceived risk in order to offer this support. Further research is needed to understand how personal and professional social media ‘roles’ and ‘profiles’ can be delineated to protect midwives and their wellbeing and promote effective practice.

Participants were also concerned about the potential increased workload and stress arising from a social media role. Linked to this are wider issues of the systemic undervaluing of midwives work and skills [36], including regularly missed breaks and unpaid overtime [37]. Existing understaffing has been compounded by Brexit and the pandemic, with Heads of Midwifery reporting that services frequently rely on the goodwill of staff to keep going [36]. Fair pay has been an ongoing issue over the last decade, with the value of midwives’ wages decreasing in real terms by over £7000 since 2010 [38]. The systemic undervaluing of their work and skills has exacerbated low morale, contributing to almost three quarters of midwives considering permanently leaving the profession [36]. Few midwives providing Facebook support were being paid to do so, even where this was part of their employed role. The majority were doing so outside an employed role and in their own time, and most had no local guidelines to support the role. One participant described the sudden acknowledgement of social media support during the COVID-19 pandemic as worthy of paid time, as ‘a kick in the guts’, expressing the frustration of those midwives seeking recognition for the time and skills they invest in this [and all] provision. Social media roles, where there are no guidelines, working hours or renumeration in place, clearly carry a risk of exacerbating existing work-based inequities and increasing pressures.

These findings are a concern, demonstrating a failure to support, safeguard and renumerate midwives who provide a service that mothers seek and services benefit from [11]. In addition to the potential personal and professional risks being shouldered by midwives, this situation also prevents effective auditing of any midwife-led online support to ensure its quality, efficacy, safety and accessibility. Being able to identify who is moderating a group is key to how mothers engage with and perceive its reliability [10,11]. It is therefore vital that services ensure midwife moderated groups are part of a robust, professional and accountable digital service [2].

While midwives in the sample often presented binary views of Facebook support as a benefit or a threat to care and services, they were aware that women’s expectations in relation to digital communication are changing. However, concerns were expressed that social media support would be relied upon to replace and justifying reduced resourcing of face-to-face services. Clearly new approaches to offering support will be needed, but these must be based on evidence, meet mothers’ needs and be integrated with care into the role of the midwife. The findings support wider research, highlighting a desire to understand ‘cybercivility’ [appropriate online engagement] and develop skills in digital professionalism [39]. This need has been brought into focus by the rapid digitalisation of services during COVID-19 [24]. Overall, findings highlight that further training is needed, and that midwives are eager to engage where guidance exists, and where policy supports practice.

The research does have limitations. This was an exploratory study in a new area which relied on large scale recruitment online, attracting participation amongst midwives and student midwives via social media posts and online sharing. Whilst efficient, this recruitment method meant those midwives active on social media may be more likely to respond and will have attracted those most motivated to take part. Although efforts were made to share the link to participate via the RCM channels and sharing encouraged outside social media were encouraged, those who choose not to use social media are less likely to have been represented. Just 1.3% of study participants were non-Facebook users, compared to 33% of the UK population, and 14.5% of 25-40 year olds [40]. Whilst this may be partially a result of the internet data collection methods, the demographic of midwives and student midwives in the sample reflected the childbearing women they care for [the majority being female and aged 22-40 years], who themselves represent the largest number of social media users [5]. It is unsurprising therefore that almost all participants were active Facebook users, that 95.1% find the platform convenient and easy to use and that 77.6% also used other social media such as Twitter or Instagram. Limitations of data collection methods aside, these findings suggest that much of the midwifery workforce is familiar with using social media for personal use, potentially providing a strong foundation for developing skills for the midwifery moderator role. However, many participants also expressed strongly held views about the personal nature of their Facebook use and a desire to keep professional life and engagement with women separate. Overall, 44% stated they would not consider a role that involved offering Facebook support in future. It is evident that digital skills present less of a barrier than the pervasive conception of social media use as unprofessional.

Similarly, although our sample was predominantly from White or White British backgrounds [93%], this number and the representation of other ethnic groups reflects the number of registered midwives from these backgrounds in the UK [21].

The questionnaire design relied on self-reports and although anonymous, social desirability bias should be considered in survey responses by professionals [41]. Social media use by midwives is presented as professionally problematic by educators, employers and professional bodies, which could lead to denying involvement or exaggerating negative views. However, participants were self-selecting and questions carefully worded to minimise any bias.

Limitations aside, this study has demonstrated that there are significant perceived personal and professional barriers to the integration of Facebook as a tool for supporting mothers into midwifery practice. Despite strategic goals encouraging social media interaction and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on delivering digital communication, progress in maternity services remains slow. Mixed messages between local and national policies and defensive social media policies are causing fear amongst midwives. A lack of support from employers and resistance from midwifery educators is preventing creative approaches to overcoming the complexities of using Facebook to support families. It is clear midwife moderated Facebook support has the potential to support skill development, improve communication and meet women’s needs. However, the application of the knowledge, skill and passion of midwives to delivering support via social media needs wider exploration to ensure access is equitable, appropriately resourced and midwives are supported, protected and renumerated. Further research also needs to establish how appropriate digital professionalism training can be developed and implemented to reduce fear and improve engagement. This is vital if maternity services are to meet mothers’ expectations for digital access to support, and strategic goals for digital transformation.

Materials & methods