Abstract
Objective To examine vaccine uptake, hesitancy and explanatory factors amongst people with serious and/or chronic health conditions, including the impact of underlying disease on attitudes to vaccination.
Design Cross-sectional survey.
Setting Ten Australian health services.
Participants 4683 patients (3560 cancer, 842 diabetes and 281 multiple sclerosis) receiving care at the health services participated in the 42-item survey, between June 30 to October 5, 2021.
Main outcome measures Sociodemographic and disease-related characteristics, COVID-19 vaccine uptake, and the scores of three validated scales which measured vaccine hesitancy and vaccine-related beliefs generally and specific to the participants’ disease, including the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Scale, the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence and Complacency Scale and the Disease Influenced Vaccine Acceptance Scale. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the associations between scale scores and vaccine uptake.
Results Of all participants, 81.5% reported having at least one COVID-19 vaccine. Unvaccinated status was associated with younger age, female sex, lower education and income, English as a second language, and residence in regional areas (all p<0.05). Unvaccinated participants were more likely to report greater vaccine hesitancy and more negative perceptions toward vaccines (all p<0.05). Disease-related vaccine concerns were associated with unvaccinated status and hesitancy, including greater complacency about COVID-19 infection, and concerns relating to vaccine efficacy and impact on their disease and/or treatment (all p<0.05).
Conclusions Disease-specific concerns impact COVID-19 vaccine-related behaviours and beliefs in people with serious and/or chronic health conditions. This highlights the need to develop targeted strategies and education about COVID-19 vaccination to support medically vulnerable populations and health professionals.
Trial registration ACTRN12621001467820
Competing Interest Statement
LG and Monash University were awarded grant funding from Merck Pharmaceuticals, outside of the submitted work. DD received research support (clinical trials for institution) from: Beigene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, EpimAb, Harbour BioMed, Maxinovel, MSD, Olema Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, PhamAbcine, and Roche
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Human Research Ethics Committee of Monash Health gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
