Abstract
Background During disasters, the most pressing demands are those related to health, and hospital preparedness is an area that require special attention. Hospitals are viewed as resources that must be proactively utilized in the event of a disaster. If national and local systems, particularly health systems, are unprepared to deal with disasters, the vulnerability of both individuals and communities is amplified. The unexpected surge in demand for important health services caused by disasters frequently overwhelms health systems and institutions, leaving them unable to perform the life-saving measures that are required. This study aims to understand various domains of hospital disaster preparedness by critically synthesizing qualitative evidence from selected research on the topic.
Methods Electronic data base from PubMed, Google Scholar, key hospital disaster related journals was explored with search syntax focusing on hospital related disaster preparedness. Peer reviewed English articles published from January 2011 were systematically selected and critical interpretative qualitative synthesis was done to have comprehensive understanding of the said phenomenon.
Results A total of 29 articles were included in the systematic review. Major resultant domains describing disaster preparedness were Human Resource, Logistics And Finance, Response, Communication, Coordination, Patient Care, Evacuation and Personal Protection. Some domains were more emphasised than others, this information can help prioritizing the action based on need especially in the times of disaster.
Conclusion Disaster preparedness needs a comprehensive approach including context specific optimization with the effective use of available resources.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study is a systematic review with critical interpretative synthesis and no ethical issues are involved
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript.The study is a qualitative synthesis from selected studies.
