Abstract
Visualising patient wait times in emergency departments for patients and families is increasingly common, following the development of prediction models using routinely collected patient demographic, urgency and flow data. Consumers of an emergency department wait time display will have culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, are more likely to be from under-served populations and will have varied data literacy skills. The wait times are uncertain, the information is presented when people are emotionally and physically challenged, and the predictions may inform high stakes decisions. In such a stressful environment, simplicity is crucial and the visual language must cater to the diverse audience. When wait times are conveyed well, patient experience improves. Designers must ensure the visualisation is patient-centred and that data are consistently and correctly interpreted. In this article, we present the results of a design study at three hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, undertaken in 2021. We used rapid iterative testing and evaluation methodology, with patients and families from diverse backgrounds as participants, to develop and validate a wait time display. We present the design process and the results of this project. Patients, families and staff were eligible to participate if they were awaiting care in the emergency department, or worked in patient reception and waiting areas. The patient-centred approach taken in our design process varies greatly from past work led by hospital administrations, and the resulting visualisations are very distinct. Most currently displayed wait time visualisations could be adapted to better meet end-user needs. Also of note, we found that techniques developed by visualisation researchers for conveying temporal uncertainty tended to overwhelm the diverse audience rather than inform. There is a need to balance precise and comprehensive information presentation against the strong need for simplicity in such a stressful environment.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Sambor family, via the Cabrini Foundation. Researchers and health services provided in-kind donations of time.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Human Research and Ethics Committee of Cabrini, Melbourne, Australia gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are not available due to privacy and consent concerns.
