Abstract
In Sri Lanka, the double burden of nutrition is often neglected, and increase of adolescent obesity is not well investigated. This study determines the double burden of malnutrition among adolescents in Anuradhapura district exploring the differences of prevalence based on different definitions. Students aged 13 to 16 years were selected from 74 schools using probability proportionate to size sampling. Anthropometry was done according to WHO guidelines. Obesity was defined according to body mass index (BMI) based definitions of WHO, International Obesity Task Force and Indian growth references. Central obesity was defined using Indian and British waist circumference cut-offs. Prevalence estimates from different definitions were compared using McNemar’s test. Socio-demographic determinants of nutritional issues were assessed using Chi-square test for independence. A total of 3105 students (47.7% boys) were studied (mean age 14.8+ 0.8 years). According to WHO definitions, 73 (2.4%, 95% CI; 1.9–2.9) were obese, 222 (7.2%, 95% CI; 6.3–8.1) were overweight, 673 (21.7%, 95% CI; 20.2–23.1,) were thin and 396 (12.8%, 95% CI; 11.6–14.0) were stunted. More boys (3.1%) than girls (1.7%) were obese as well as thin (29.0% compared to 15.0%). Prevalence of overweight/obesity was higher among students in larger, urban schools, and belonging to high social class and more educated parents. Prevalence of overweight/obesity estimated using IOTF-Asian and Indian thresholds were significantly higher than that from WHO and IOTF-international thresholds. Double burden of malnutrition is affecting the adolescents in rural Sri Lanka. Prevalence estimates of obesity largely depend on the definition used.
Competing Interest Statement
Authors BLG, NSK and SS declare no conflicts of interest. Author SBA is a member of the editorial board of the Journal PLOS Global Public Health.
Funding Statement
Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Mihintale, Sri Lanka (http://www.rjt.ac.lk/) awarded two research grants (RJT/RP&HDC/2012/Med. & Alli. Sci. /R/05 and RJT/RP&HDC/2013/Med. & Alli. Sci. /R/04) to BLG. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics review committee of the faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Mihintale, Sri Lanka.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
Data file is uploaded with the manuscript as supportive information Also available at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRfCxDhLOCqmNUgcxJ6osRP78nVMMLEfFeTe5D8tJg3vS-8Xo4dOvBsONTLf8nlKQ/pubhtml
