Abstract
Background The burden of hypertension in South Africa, as well as the successive cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is increasing. Hypertension presents a risk for subsequent cognitive impairment with age. This study sought to determine the association between blood pressure, arterial stiffness, using pulse wave velocity and pulse amplification pressure, and cognitive function in younger and older adults from a 30yr old urban South African birth cohort study.
Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study among n=93 index children (now age 29yr) and their mothers (all women). We collected peripheral and central blood pressure (BP) variables, and conducted a cognitive assessment using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) instrument and analysed the association of BP variables with global cognitive tests and specific domains.
Results Forty percent of the pooled sample had low MoCA total scores, and 32% of the total sample had hypertension. No associations were found in the regression analysis between BP related variables and total MoCA scores. Also, no associations were found between peripheral and central BP variables with individual cognitive domains when stratified by age. A significant relationship was found between mean pressure and low visual perception (i.e. the ability to interpret information that is seen and give it meaning; p=0.02).
Conclusion Central mean pressure is associated with low visual perception domain among black women. These findings add to the growing evidence which suggests that central BP variables are important to explore as exposure proxies for studying the association of BP and cognitive decline especially at mid-life.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding: This study was supported by a Wellcome Trust Seed Award in Science [214082/Z/18/Z] and equipment grants from the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We conducted the study in line with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki [28] and obtained approval from the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand (South Africa) (Ref: M190263).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: This study was supported by a Wellcome Trust Seed Award in Science [214082/Z/18/Z] and equipment grants from the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Conflict of interest: None to disclose.
Data Availability
All data will be available upon request 3 months after formal publication of this work.