Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing among un- and under-screened Māori, Pasifika, and Asian women in Aotearoa New Zealand: a preference survey among responders and interviews with clinical-trial non-responders

Susan M. Sherman; Karen Bartholomew; Naomi Brewer; Collette Bromhead; Sue Crengle; Chris Cunningham; Jeroen Douwes; Sunia Foliaki; Jane Grant; Anna Maxwell; Georgina McPherson; John D. Potter; Nina Scott; Helen Wihongi

doi:10.1101/2022.03.29.22273037

ABSTRACT

Aim Māori, Pasifika, and Asian women are less likely to attend cervical screening and Māori and Pasifika women are more likely to be diagnosed with later-stage cervical cancer than other women in Aotearoa New Zealand. This study – with under-screened women taking part in a randomised controlled trial comparing self-testing and standard screening – explored the acceptability of an HPV self-test kit and the preferred method for receiving it.

Methods Māori, Pasifika, and Asian women (N=376) completed a postal questionnaire. Twenty-six women who had not accepted the trial invitation were interviewed to understand their reasons for non-participation.

Results Most women found the self-test kit easy and convenient to use and reported that they did not find it painful, uncomfortable, or embarrassing. This was reflected in the preference for a self-test over a future smear test on the same grounds. Most women preferred to receive the kit by mail and take the test themselves, rather than having it done by a doctor or nurse. There was a range of preferences relating to how to return the kit. Phone calls with non-responders revealed that, although most had received the test kit, the reasons for not choosing to be involved included not wanting to, being too busy, or forgetting.

Conclusions HPV self-testing was acceptable for Māori, Pasifika, and Asian women in Aotearoa New Zealand. HPV self-testing has considerable potential to reduce the inequities in the current screening programme and should be made available with appropriate delivery options as soon as possible.

Competing Interest Statement

N Brewer reports grants from Janssen-Cilag Pty Limited, outside the submitted work. C Bromhead has previously received educational funding to attend conferences from Roche Diagnostics New Zealand. S Crengle reports personal fees from Board member WellSouth Primary Health Network, personal fees from General Practitioner, Invercargill Medical Centre, personal fees from Board member, Royal NZ College of General Practitioners, outside the submitted work. H Wihongi reports grants and other from Waitemata; District Health Board, outside the submitted work. She is also a member and convener of the National Kaitiaki Group. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Statement

Health Research Council of Aotearoa New Zealand (HRC 16/405)

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Northern B Health and Disability Ethics Committee (HDEC) of Aotearoa New Zealand gave ethical approval for this work (reference: 17/NTB/120).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes