Abstract
Objective Fasciotomy can increase the mobility of the superficial femoral artery and reduce the incidence of stent breakage. This study aimed to compare the long-term patency of drug-eluting nitinol stents with and without fasciotomy in patients with prolonged SFA occlusions.
Methods A randomized clinical trial was conducted in 60 (1:1) patients with long femoropopliteal steno-occlusive lesions more than 200 mm. Patients in group 1 (Zilver) underwent recanalization of occlusion of the femoropopliteal artery with stenting. In group 2 (ZilverFas), recanalization of the femoropopliteal occlusion with stenting and fasciotomy of Gunter’s canal were performed. The follow up evaluation of patency at 6, 12 months.
Results 12-month primary patency in Zilver and ZilverFas groups was 51% and 80%, respectively (p = 0.02). The freedom from target revascularization (TLR) in Zilver and ZilverFas groups was 50% and 76%, respectively (p = 0.04). At one-years, primary-assisted and secondary patency for the ZilverFas and Zilver groups were 83% versus 62% (p = 0.07), 86% versus 65% (p = 0.05), respectively. In groups Zilver and ZilverFas, the number of stents fracture was 14 and 7, respectively (p = 0.05). The Cox multivariables regression indicated that the stent fracture, diabetes mellitus were the independent predictor of restenosis and reocclusion. Fasciotomy reduced the chance of reocclusion and restenosis by 2.94 times.
Conclusions Our study has shown that a decompressing the stented segment with fasciotomy significantly improves the patency of the femoropopliteal segment and significantly reduces the number and severity of stents fractures.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT02590471
Funding Statement
COOK medical group provided stents for the study
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Meshalkin national medical research center ethics committee approved the study protocol Order №8470;22 21 January 2015
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Co-authors’ emails:
Olesya Sergeevna Osipova MD olesyO{at}yandex.ru
Pavel Vladimirovitch Ignatenko MD, PhD p_ignatenko{at}meshalkin.ru
Savr Vasilievitch Bugurov MD bugurov_s{at}meshalkin.ru
Alexandr Alexandrovitch Gostev MD, PhD a_gostev{at}meshalkin.ru
Shoraan Biche-oolovich Saaya MD, PhD s_saaya{at}meshalkin.ru
Artem Alexandrovitch Rabtsun MD a_rabtsun{at}meshalkin.ru
Andrey Anatolievitch Karpenko MD, PhD a_karpenko{at}meshalkin.ru
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript