Abstract
Children must correctly use an appropriate restraint type to receive optimal crash protection. To this end, legislation was introduced in Australia in 2009/2010 requiring correct use of age-appropriate restraints among all children up to age 7 years. Prior to this legislation population-referenced estimates of restraint practices in NSW, Australia in 2008 showed suboptimal restraint practices to be widespread. There have been no updated estimates since that time. In this study, we aim to update these estimates using data collected approximately 10 years after the introduction of the legislation.
A stratified cluster sample was constructed to collect population referenced observational data from children aged 0-12 years across the Greater Sydney region of NSW. Data collection methods mimicked those used in the 2008 data. Randomly selected children were observed in their own restraints in their own vehicles by trained researchers. Appropriate use was assessed based on compliance with current NSW legislation. Correct use was defined as use exactly as the manufacturer intended. Errors were categorised as minor or serious on their likely impact of crash protection, and whether they related to installing the restraint in the vehicle or securing the child in the restraint.
Almost all children were appropriately restrained (99.3%, 95%CI 98.4-100). However, less than half were correctly restrained (Any error = 40.4%, 95%CI 32.6-48.3; Any serious error= 43.8%, 95%CI 35.0-52.7). Both securing and installation related errors remain common. There were variations in the extent of errors in use in different restraint types with the least errors among seat belt and the most among booster seat users. While, overall, the odds of incorrect use decreased with increasing age (OR), the relationship between age and incorrect use was different among booster seats user, with decreasing odds with ever year older.
While there was no attempt to test the impact of the legislation on restraint use, it was clear there had been substantial increases in the proportion of children using appropriate forms of restraint over the last 10 years. However there appears to have been no real change in rates of correct use.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Australian Research Council Discovery Project DP170103517
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study methods were approved in August 2018 from the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District (SESLHD) Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). Approval to collect data at education sites was also obtained via the NSW School Education Research Applications Process (SERAP).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors