Abstract
Paediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome (PIMS-TS, also known as MIS-C) typically occurs 2-6 weeks after exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Early estimates suggested a risk of PIMS-TS of 1 in 3-4000 infected children. Whether this risk is sustained with new SARS-CoV-2 variants remains unknown.
We utilised prospective data from the NHS South Thames Paediatric Network (STPN), which manages all cases of PIMS-TS amongst 1.5 million children in South-East England, to assess trends over time. We compared PIMS-TS cases with two independent SARS-CoV-2 infection datasets. We used publicly available UK Health Security Agency case numbers weighted to child population distributions according to area population estimates from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). To avoid bias due to evolving testing behaviour, we also compared PIMS-TS cases to community infection rates, obtained from the ONS COVID-19 Infection Survey, which randomly selects individuals for fortnightly PCR tests. All three datasets were normalised to the peak of the Alpha wave, and plotted against time. PIMS-TS cases were plotted 40 days prior to hospitalisation, corresponding to the best fit of rising SARS-CoV-2 infection and PIMS-TS cases during the Alpha wave.
Compared with the Alpha wave, we found fewer cases of PIMS-TS relative to SARS-CoV-2 infections during both initial and subsequent Delta waves. This relative reduction continued into the Omicron wave.
Re-infection rates with the Alpha or Delta variants and vaccination rates were very low during the Delta wave. As a result, lower PIMS-TS rate relative to SARS-CoV-2 infections during the Delta wave is unlikely to be explained by population level immunity from prior infection or vaccination. It is most likely due to viral mutations in key antigenic epitopes responsible for triggering the hyperinflammatory response observed with PIMS-TS.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
UK NHS Health Research Authority deemed this project did not require Research Ethics Committee review.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data not publically available used in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
