ABSTRACT
Background Zoonotic diseases pose a direct threat to health and undercut livelihoods in the communities in which they occur. A combination of anthropogenic, animal, and ecosystem activities drives the emergence and re-emergence of zoonotic diseases. Consequently, One Health approaches are necessary to alleviate disease impacts. To be effective, understanding people’s Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices concerning these disease threats are essential for their prevention, control, and eventual elimination. Livestock traders interact closely with livestock, which puts these traders at high risk of infection and creates conditions by which they may spread zoonotic pathogens through the animals they trade. It is, thus, essential to examine practices among actors involved in livestock trade to understand how well to mitigate these risks in a non-pastoral production system.
Methods Busia County was selected for this study because it is a predominantly crop-producing area, with cross-border (between Kenya and Uganda) trade in livestock. A qualitative study was conducted among the actors in the livestock trade on their knowledge, attitudes, and practices that may contribute to the spread, control, and prevention of zoonotic disease transmission. A thematic analysis framework was used to categorize and synthesize data from In-depth interviews (IDIs) and the Key informant interviews(KIIs).
Results Whereas participants could list the signs of zoonotic diseases, they could not identify these diseases by name, which, demonstrates insufficient knowledge of zoonosis. Brucellosis, Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD), and Anthrax were broadly mentioned as diseases of importance by many actors this shows that they are the common livestock diseases in the area. The actors identified sick animals by checking for dropped ears, mass mucus production; diarrhea; bloody urinal discharge; and general animal activity levels, an animal that is not actively eating or walking will be a sign of sickness. To manage the spread of these diseases, they wash their animals, isolate sick animals from the rest of the stock; vaccinate their animals against certain diseases as preventive practices, they also seek help from animal health professionals for the sick animals as curative practices. The practices of skinning dead animals before burying them and the consumption of dead carcasses risk the increase of zoonotic disease transmission. These practices are drawn from cultural values and beliefs about the curses and potential loss of entire stock if livestock is unceremoniously disposed of upon death, irrespective of the cause.
Conclusions and recommendations Livestock actors have agency in the prevention and elimination of zoonotic diseases, hence, they need to be involved when developing intervention programs and policies for the extension services. Training these actors as a continuum of animal health workers blends lay and professional knowledge, which alongside their intense contact with large numbers of animals, becomes a critical disease surveillance tool this may also play a role in supporting state actors in disease surveillance and response. There is an urgent need to increase awareness of zoonoses within livestock keepers and traders, these campaigns, need should deploy multi-disciplinary teams with an understanding of human health, animal health, and social scientists so that the risky but deeply rooted traditional practices like skinning and eating dead animals can be minimized.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Prof Eric M. Fevre received the grant hppt://www.cgiar.org/funders/ The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the International Livestock Research Institute Institutional Research Ethics Committee in Kenya (ILRI-IREC2017-08), which is registered and accredited by the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation in Kenya, and approved by the Federal wide Assurance for the Protection of Human Subjects in the USA. A research permit was obtained from the National Commission for Science, Technology, and Innovation (NACOSTI) License No: NACOSTI/P/19/2547.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All the data is available and can be requested through the my email address KHAMMAJIWA{at}GMAIL.COM