Immunogenicity and reactogenicity against the SARS-CoV-2 variants following heterologous primary series involving CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 plus heterologous BNT162b2 booster vaccination: An open-label randomized study in healthy Thai adults

Suvimol Niyomnaitham; Zheng Quan Toh; Patimaporn Wongprompitak; Laddawan Jansarikit; Kanjana Srisutthisamphan; Sompong Sapsutthipas; Yuparat Jantraphakorn; Natthakarn Mingngamsup; Paul V Licciardi; Kulkanya Chokephaibulkit

doi:10.1101/2022.03.03.22271601

Abstract

We evaluated the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of heterologous COVID-19 primary series vaccination schedules. Participants were randomized to one of seven groups that received two-dose homologous BNT162b2 or heterologous combinations of CoronaVac, ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2, with 4 weeks interval. Of 210 participants, median age was 38 (19-60) years, 51% were female. The groups that received BNT162b2 as second dose induced the highest virus-specific IgG response against the ancestral strain [BNT162b2: geometric mean concentration (GMC) 2133-2249, 95%CI 1558 to 3055; ChAdOx1: 851-1201, 95%CI 649 to 1522; CoronaVac: 137-225, 95%CI 103-286 BAU/mL], neutralising antibodies (NAb) against Beta and Delta, and interferon gamma response. All groups induced low to negligible NAb against Omicron. A BNT162b2 booster (3^rd dose) following heterologous CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 regimens induced >140-fold increase in NAb titres against Omicron. Our findings indicate that heterologous regimens using BNT162b2 as the second dose may be considered an alternative schedule to maximize immune response.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

http://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20210720007

Funding Statement

This study was granted by the National Research Council of Thailand (N35A640368).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The clinical study was approved by the Siriraj Institutional Ethics Review Board (approval no.Si537/2021).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.