ABSTRACT
Recent research underscores the exceptionally young age distribution of Covid-19 deaths in the United States compared with international peers. We show that the high level of Covid mortality at midlife ages (45-64) is deeply intertwined with continuing racial inequality in Covid-19 mortality, which persists even in contexts in which non-white populations might seem to have a survival advantage. We use data from Minnesota, which allows vaccination and mortality rates to be observed with greater age and temporal precision than national data. At midlife ages in Minnesota, Black, Hispanic, and Asian populations were all more highly vaccinated than white populations during the state’s substantial and sustained Delta surge. Yet white mortality rates were lower than those of all other racial groups. These mortality disparities were extreme; during the Delta period, non-white Covid-19 mortality at ages 55-64 was greater than white mortality at 10 years older. This discrepancy between vaccination and mortality patterning by race suggests that, if the current period is a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” it also remains a “pandemic of the disadvantaged” in ways that can decouple from vaccination rates. This result implies an urgent need to center health equity in the development of Covid-19 policy measures.
The introduction of effective vaccines in early 2021 resulted in a general consensus, for a time, that future surges would lead to a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.”1 If this supposition held, Covid-associated mortality by group would become highly reflective of vaccine status. In the present study, we evaluated this supposition for different racial/ethnic groups in Minnesota using death certificate data on all Covid-19 deaths from March 2020 to December 2021.
We examined Minnesota because of the unique availability of near-real-time data on both vaccination status and Covid-19 mortality that are simultaneously separated by race/ethnicity and age and cover individual time periods within the pandemic. In contrast, national vaccination data that are race/ethnicity-specific are not separated by age. Minnesota also stands out for its prolonged and deadly surge of the Delta variant, which did not end until it was supplanted by the Omicron surge at the end of 2021.2 The resulting high mortality in Fall 2021 allows us to explore mortality in specific racial/ethnic groups at key midlife ages, when many Covid deaths occur in the U.S.3-5
Results
By the end of 2021 in Minnesota, vaccination among white Minnesotans was outpaced by vaccination among Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) Minnesotans at midlife ages (ages 45-64). Yet in all age groups and in each phase of the pandemic, white mortality was substantially lower than mortality among Minnesotans of color (Fig. 1A-1C).
White undervaccination at midlife ages is pronounced: at the end of 2021, “fully vaccinated” rates were 77% for BIPOC Minnesotans compared to only 70% for white Minnesotans (Fig. 1B). Yet, the gap in BIPOC-white mortality at those same ages was extreme; for example, during the Delta period, for both men and women, BIPOC mortality at ages 55-64 was higher than white mortality at ages 65-74 (Fig. 1D). Despite relatively high vaccination rates, BIPOC populations as a whole had, not only greater Covid-19 mortality than same-age whites, but Covid-19 mortality equivalent to more than 10 years of additional age (at white mortality levels).
At key midlife ages (45-64), Minnesota’s white population is its second-least vaccinated racial/ethnic group (following Native Americans) (Fig 2A). However, despite low vaccination rates, Minnesota’s white population aged 45-64 has lower mortality than all other racial/ethnic groups, which ranged, during the period dominated by the Delta variant, from 125% (Asian) to 490% (Native) of white mortality (Fig 2B). Due to the relatively old age of the white population even within this age group, in age- and gender-standardized rates, the disparities in this period are even starker, with other racial groups ranging from 155% (Asian) to 511% (Native) of white mortality (Fig 2C). Figure 2D underscores this discrepancy: there is a generally close relationship between racial/ethnic groups’ mortality during the Delta period and their vaccination rates at that period’s midpoint—with the striking exception of white Minnesotans, who are advantaged relative to even the highest-vaccinated group, Asian-Americans.
Discussion
The present study found that despite lower vaccination rates (compared to all but Native Minnesotans), during the Delta surge and early Omicron surge in late 2021, white Minnesotans had lower Covid-19 mortality at midlife than did Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native Minnesotans. We note two broad possible explanations for these puzzling results. One possibility is that racial inequality in Covid-19 mortality risk—due to differential transmission, comorbidities, or unequal medical access4—among the unvaccinated, the vaccinated, or both, may be so great that it simply overwhelms the differences in vaccination status. A second possibility is that findings may reflect vaccine differences within the “fully vaccinated” population, with people of color potentially less likely to have received booster shots and less likely to have received mRNA vaccines in their primary series.5 These possibilities reflect the continuing inequities of the pandemic even in the period of widespread vaccination.
Regardless of the precise mechanism, the findings suggest that the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” formulation is incomplete and that Covid-19 also remains a “pandemic of the disadvantaged.” If population mortality primarily reflected population vaccination rates, then we would have expected to find that white communities in midlife would have an equal or greater burden of Covid-19 mortality than communities of color. The fact that we did not observe such a finding indicates that social and structural determinants of health, such as health care access, occupational risks, language barriers, and housing conditions, continue to fundamentally shape risk of Covid-19 mortality even in the Delta/Omicron period.4,6–9
While a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” framing may be used as a rationale for current policy actions at the federal and state levels, which include phasing out vaccine and mask mandates and accelerating a “return to normal,” a “pandemic of the disadvantaged” framing emphasizes the need for sustained population-based Covid-19 prevention and mitigation strategies that center health equity. Such measures could aim to further increase vaccination with intensive communication campaigns organized with community partners, widespread and expedited access to walk-in vaccine clinics (including for those working atypical hours), paid sick leave facilitating vaccination in the context of feared side effects, and vaccine delivery programs targeting low-income neighborhoods, schools, and workplaces. Such measures might also aim to mitigate Covid-19 spread, acknowledging that, even in contexts in which vaccine uptake among people of color is relatively high, the mortality burden of the pandemic remains unequally borne. The pandemic of the disadvantaged framing suggests that a sole emphasis on individual behavior will not be adequate for reducing health inequities at midlife.
The extent to which findings in Minnesota may resemble those of other state contexts is unclear. If vaccination rates are generally higher in metropolitan areas compared with rural areas, other states with very urban populations of color and large rural white populations may show similar vaccination disparities. At the national level, aggregated over all ages, the white population does not have a lower vaccination rate than all BIPOC communities, although in most states, white vaccination is lower than the high average age of white populations would predict.10 However, the lack of publicly available data on the age composition of vaccine status by race/ethnicity for the U.S. as a whole limits the ability to know how widespread the midlife patterns identified here may be.
Recent research emphasizes the exceptionally young age distribution of Covid-19 deaths in the United States relative to other countries.11,12 The results in the present study highlight how this distinctive risk at midlife may be intertwined with the deep inequality in U.S. Covid-19 mortality. Populations of color may be at notably high risk at midlife—even when they have greater vaccination rates than white people at the same ages.
Materials & Methods
Death certificate data and Covid-19 vaccination data were obtained from the Minnesota Department of Public Health (MDH). Deaths were defined as Covid-19 deaths if there was any mention of U07.1 on the death certificate. We calculated Covid-19 death rates by race/ethnicity for three pandemic periods corresponding to pre-vaccination (March 2020-January 2021), mid-vaccination (February-July 2021), and late-vaccination, Delta-dominated (July-December 2021) time periods. The “Delta period” also includes the very early stages of the Omicron surge in Minnesota.
The death certificates analyzed were those included in a data release from MDH on February 1, 2022. Among 2021 Covid-19 deaths included in the death certificate database, 91% were added to these regularly-updated data within three weeks following the date of death. Thus, these data are likely close to complete for 2021 deaths but may underreport a small proportion of deaths in late December.
To create death rates from the death certificates, we used 2020 population estimates from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), as the most recently available estimates. We chose not to project denominators for 2021, instead using official 2020 estimates, since 2020 population dynamics (shaping 2021 populations) are so distinctive relative to the dynamics of prior years. In order to report death rates across periods of unequal length (e.g., an 11-month pre-vaccination period vs. a 6-month Delta period), we annualized all rates. To construct age- and gender-standardized death rates at midlife, we performed a “direct” standardization that reweights each race/ethnic population’s mortality using a shared set of weights.13 As our “standard” population weights, we used the 5-year-age and gender distribution of the full 2020 Minnesota population at ages 45-64.
We defined “vaccinated” as “fully vaccinated,” which means two doses of an mRNA-based vaccine or one dose of adenoviral vaccine. We used “fully vaccinated” rather than “single-shot vaccinated” as our vaccination metric because full vaccination provides greater protection and is likely to be reported with higher data quality.14 Booster shot uptake is not available by race/ethnicity in Minnesota.
Vaccine data were reported at the adult age categories 19-44, 45-64, and 65+; our main mortality analyses accordingly used these groups. Some racial group populations are too small to examine separately for ages 65+ in Minnesota. Thus, we show individual racial groups at ages 45-64 (Fig. 2) and dichotomous white vs. BIPOC when examining all age groups separately (Fig. 1). Mortality analyses support the use of the BIPOC category because, in Minnesota, the primary mortality divide at all high-mortality ages, all time periods, and for both genders is between white Minnesotans vs. all others.15 We report mortality rates using race-bridging for multiracial populations; vaccination rates are reported by the state with single-race populations. We use denominators constructed with the appropriate racial categories for these respective numerators.
Minnesota vaccination data are reported as population percentages using 2018 population denominators. These denominators can result in unrealistically high vaccination estimates for growing subpopulations; for example, state data report that 100% of Black and Asian Minnesotans aged 65+ are fully vaccinated. We adjusted these vaccine rates using the ratio of 2020 to 2018 population sizes. We note that, because state vaccination data for Black and Asian populations aged 65+ are top-coded at 100%, our adjusted estimates likely under-estimate vaccination for these populations; moreover, under-estimating these two groups will produce likely under-estimation in the BIPOC category as a whole since Black and Asian populations together constitute 69% of the 65+ BIPOC population. This under-estimation is conservative for our argument by exaggerating the extent to which white populations aged 65+ are more vaccinated than BIPOC populations (Fig 1C).
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at https://osf.io/bxjkh/?view_only=80e912ce2b624ab7a78e51754c3952e3
https://osf.io/bxjkh/?view_only=80e912ce2b624ab7a78e51754c3952e3
Data Availability
Data are available at https://osf.io/bxjkh/?view_only=80e912ce2b624ab7a78e51754c3952e3
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute on Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD041023, F31HD107980), the National Institute on Aging (P30AG066613, R01AG060115-04S1), the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Grant #77521), and the University of Minnesota School of Public Health. The interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institutes of Health or the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. We thank Michelle Niemann and Matthew Plummer for helpful comments.