Navigating life with HIV as an older adult on the Kenyan coast: perceived health challenges seen through the biopsychosocial model

Theoretical Framework

We utilized Engel’s biopsychosocial (BPS) model of health (29), which provides a logical account of the chronic, complex, and dynamic nature of HIV. The fundamental tenet of this model for OALWH is the recognition of healthy ageing as the ability to thrive in an evolving environment influenced by physical/biological, mental/psychological, and social factors (as shown in Figure 1). The model provides a holistic approach to understanding the health needs of older adults and is supported by calls for research that positively impact the physical, mental, and social aspects of ageing with HIV (30-32). This model conceptualizes the physical, psychological, and social (both interpersonal and contextual) effects on health as dynamics. According to this model, the cause, manifestation and outcome of wellness and disease are determined by a dynamic interaction between physical, psychological, and social factors (29). Each component of the model includes systems that reciprocally influence other dynamics in the model and also affect health.

Study context and participants

This study was carried out between October and December 2019 at the Kenya Medical Research Institute-Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP) located within Kilifi County at the coast of Kenya. By the end of 2019, there were roughly 1.5 million residents in Kilifi County, the majority of whom were rural dwellers (about 60%), and 11% were aged ≥50 years (33). Most Kilifi residents belong to the Mijikenda ethnic group, whose main form of livelihood is subsistence farming and small-scale trading. Close to 60% of Kilifi County residents live below the poverty line, and one-third (36%) have not attained any formal education (34). Kilifi has an HIV prevalence of 38 per 1000 people (35). Women are disproportionately more affected than men (HIV prevalence of 54 vs 23 per 1000, respectively). The HIV prevalence for older people ≥50 years is unknown in this setting as it is not routinely documented during surveys. However, anecdotal reports from several HIV clinics in the study setting suggest an increasing number of older people living with HIV with unmet healthcare needs. Kilifi County is primarily served by one major public referral hospital (the Kilifi County Hospital), a few sub-county public hospitals and health centres. People living with HIV usually receive care in specialized HIV clinics within the primary facilities.

This study involved the following three groups of participants:

1. HIV infected older adults aged at least 50 years receiving HIV care and treatment at the HIV Comprehensive Care Clinic of the Kilifi County Hospital (KCH).

2. Healthcare providers attending to the older adults living with HIV. These included clinical officers, nursing officers, counsellors (within primary care facilities) and project managers of community-based organizations.

3. Primary caregivers of the older adults living with HIV who mostly tended to be close relatives, including spouses, children, and extended family members.

Recruitment and eligibility

Study participants were selected purposively to represent diversity in the participants’ characteristics, including age, sex, residence, and the cadre of service (for healthcare providers). Initial contact was made with a community health volunteer (stationed at the Kilifi County Referral Hospital) with over ten years’ experience working with PLWH at the community and hospital levels. We capitalized on her experience and connections with several HIV clinics and community-based organizations around Kilifi during our recruitment process. Recruitment was conducted by a trained research assistant in liaison with the community health volunteer during their routine clinic visits. Participants expressing interest were then given more information concerning the study and how to take part. OALWH had to be ≥50 years old and on HIV treatment to be eligible. Primary caregivers were identified through the older adults living with HIV, usually during their scheduled clinic visits. These caregivers had to be directly involved in providing care and support, e.g. medical care to an older adult living with and spending time with the adult. HIV providers were approached at their place of work and invited to participate. We specifically targeted providers who provided direct care to OALWH. Participants who agreed to participate were then invited to a face-to-face interview at a convenient place, usually at KEMRI Kilifi.

Data collection and tools

The lead author (PNM) conducted in-depth interviews lasting on average 45-60 minutes with each participant. All the interviews were guided by a pre-tested semi-structured interview schedule developed with guidance from prior work on HIV and ageing. All interviews were conducted in Swahili, English or Giryama. We also sought permission from the participants to take notes and audio record the interviews. A total of 56 interviews were conducted (34 among older adults living with HIV, 11 among healthcare providers and 11 among primary caregivers).

Among the older adults living with HIV, topic guide themes included: patient illness experiences following diagnoses, e.g. significant mental trauma, health changes over the years and the prevailing health challenges. These issues were explored using general open-ended questions, followed by additional probing to highlight further the issue raised. For healthcare providers, participants were invited to share their experiences providing care to older adults living with HIV. Specific topic guide themes included the important health challenges observed in the older adults and their preparedness to meet their needs. Among caregivers, we explored different issues, including their experiences taking care of OALWH and the challenges these adults face in their environment. We also collected respondents’ demographic information such as age, sex, educational status, and employment status. For HIV infected adults, we also collected HIV-related information, including years living with HIV. All participants were given Ksh 350 (about US$3) as compensation for time spent in the research, and transport expenses were also reimbursed.

Data analysis

All the audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim by a team of four trained research assistants. Subsequent data management was done using NVivo software (version 11). We applied the framework approach to analyze our qualitative data as described by Ritchie and Spice (36). Initially, two authors (PNM and AA) developed a preliminary coding framework inductively through in-depth reading of transcripts and deductively by considering themes from the interview schedules. These codes were discussed, and consensus reached on how they should be brought together into themes with guidance from the biopsychosocial model. The initial coding framework was progressively expanded to capture emergent themes as coding continued. When the coding was complete in NVivo, the lead author grouped all themes related to a specific concept together to form categories and exported this to a word-text processor to produce charts. The generated charts were used to summarize data, look for similarities or differences and explore patterns among the three groups of participants in the analyzed data.

Ethical considerations

Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study. The study also obtained ethical clearance from the Kenya Medical Research Institute Scientific and Ethics Review Unit (KEMRI/SERU/CGMR-C/152/3804) and the Kilifi County Department of Health Services (HP/KCHS/VOL.X/171).

Sample characteristics

We interviewed a total of 56 participants in this study (34 OALWH, 11 healthcare providers and 11 primary caregivers). Among OALWH, 53% were women; most (82%) had up to a primary level of education, most (73%) lived in multigenerational households, and their age ranged from 50 – 72 years. In addition, all the OALWH were on HIV treatment and had lived with HIV for a median duration of 12 years [10 – 15 years]. Healthcare providers included six registered nurses, two clinical officers, two project managers of community-based organizations and one HIV counsellor. All the primary caregivers were family members, the majority (73%) of whom were female. Further sociodemographic information and HIV-related characteristics of the OALWH are summarized in Table 1.

Perceived biopsychosocial challenges confronted by OALWH

The different forms of biopsychosocial challenges faced by OALWH are summarized in Table 2. Overall, most of the OALWH shared their 10-plus years of experience living with HIV, from the time of diagnosis to their current state. The majority of the OALWH described moving from a state of shock, fear, anger, denial, hopelessness, or suicidal ideations upon diagnosis to a state of acceptance and ownership. This transition would not be without challenges, as many of the OALWH noted having gone through traumatic experiences from family members, friends, workmates, and healthcare providers. These traumatic experiences, e.g. pervasive stigma (both enacted and internalized), prolonged periods of illness, spousal abandonment and separation, and financial loss, led to chronic stress and low mood. Thereafter, they narrated moving from a state of ownership to a state of constant survival characterized by an array of health problems which we have conceptualized as physical (biological), mental (psychological) and social according to the biopsychosocial model. Most participants believed that older adults living with HIV in Kilifi face an intricate mix of physical, mental, and psychosocial challenges. These challenges are described in detail in the following sections.

Perceived physical health challenges

Physical complaints were described to be common among adults ageing with HIV by several participants. Key among these concerns was the onset of multiple comorbidities in these adults, which was frequently associated with pain, loss of control of one’s body, emotional distress, and increased treatment burden (e.g. attending multiple clinics and medication burden). Hypertension, diabetes, ulcers/hyperacidity, hearing, and visual impairments were the most frequently reported comorbidities across the participants. Other conditions discussed (though to a lesser extent) included obesity, arthritis, stroke, teeth problems, cervical cancer, TB, and pneumonia. Apart from these comorbidities, somatic symptoms were also discussed in several interviews across the groups. Pain (in the back, extremities, joints, chest, whole-body), headaches, insomnia, fatigue or low energy, and numbness in the limbs were frequently reported. Sometimes, these symptoms were associated with emotional distress and functional impairments, e.g. difficulties bathing, using the phone, and performing house chores. Some participants believed that the onset of the physical challenges was because of HIV-related factors (e.g. HIV infection itself, long-term ART), multimorbidity, old age, food insecurity, emotional distress, substance use, and the nature of someone’s work. Participant quotes are given in Table 3.

Perceived mental health challenges

Participants discussed various mental health problems facing OALWH in the study setting. We have discussed these issues under the following headings: symptoms of common mental disorders, cognitive symptoms, substance use problems, and others (suicidal ideation and psychotic symptoms). Notably, symptoms of common mental disorders were more frequently discussed than the other problems. Participant quotes are given in Table 4.

Perceived psychosocial challenges

Participants discussed a range of psychosocial challenges. We present these issues under the following categories: a) financial challenges, b) stigma and discrimination, c) loneliness and isolation. Participant quotes are given in Table 5.

Summary of key findings

We conducted this study to gain a preliminary understanding of the health challenges facing OALWH at the coast of Kenya. Our study provides insight into the complex challenges of ageing with HIV in the study setting. It also opens opportunities for further epidemiologic research and subsequent development of tailored interventions for this vulnerable yet understudied population. Overall, our findings reveal that OALWH in this setting are particularly vulnerable to mental health problems, especially symptoms of common mental disorders, which sometimes progress to severe forms such as severe depression and suicidal ideation. They are also at risk of physical challenges, including comorbidities (especially hypertension, ulcers, and diabetes) and somatic complaints such as pain, fatigue, and insomnia. The mental and physical impairments are complicated by psychosocial challenges, including poverty, lack of support, stigma, and discrimination. Noteworthily, there was an overlap of perceived risk factors across the three health domains (e.g. family conflicts, poverty, food insecurity), suggesting that OALWH who experience these shared cumulative risk factors are more likely to face multiple health challenges. It also implies that the action taken to mitigate any or some of the shared enabling factors is likely to have a preventive spillover effect across multiple health domains. Most of the views of OALWH on health challenges were corroborated by those from the providers and caregivers. However, a few disparities emerged on some of the perceived health challenges. Current drug and substance use, for instance, was reported mainly by healthcare providers, while cognitive and somatic complaints were discussed by OALWH. By and large, our results indicate that OALWH increasingly require care that extends beyond HIV treatment, hence the urgent need to reprioritize health systems to meet their complex needs.

Physical health challenges

Our discussions clearly showed that physical challenges are important concerns for older adults living with HIV at the coast of Kenya, given their negative impacts on other health domains and overall health. The onset of multiple conditions and somatic symptoms was especially associated with pain, distress, increased treatment burden, e.g. having to attend multiple clinics reduced quality of life and functional impairment. As the number of OALWH increases in many HIV clinics, HIV care will increasingly need to draw on a wide range of medical disciplines besides evidence-based screening and monitoring protocols to ensure the healthy ageing of OALWH (3). Unfortunately, the implications of such a trend could present a significant challenge for many SSA countries, including Kenya, where older adults’ care is fragmented. Most healthcare providers presently lack guidance and training to identify and manage declines in physical and mental capacities in this population. The siloed provision of HIV care and other comorbidities could also imply that providers are unaware of the patients’ other conditions. In the current study, many OALWH reported attending multiple clinics for different conditions, which constrained their already limited funds. Some OALWH had to choose between the ART clinic and the other clinic (e.g. hypertension and diabetes). However, some providers noted that they tried to streamline appointments among the outpatient clinics, but this was not always possible. Our findings are similar to those reported in a recent qualitative exploration of challenges with seeking HIV care services for OALWH (26). Specifically, OALWH raised unique challenges when seeking HIV care, including multiple visits to healthcare providers and poor patient-provider communication. Integration of services for HIV and non-communicable diseases in primary care may enable settings like Kenya to expand healthcare coverage for PLWH. Nonetheless, there is limited evidence of its effectiveness (37). Despite some challenges, e.g. inadequacies in structure, process and outcome, initial evidence shows that service integration can be a valuable strategy to improving health outcomes among PLWH (38).

The current findings also revealed a prominent intersection between ageing and HIV. For most participants, ageing rather than HIV was the primary concern. This is not surprising considering that among PLWH with controlled viraemia, HIV infection often stops being the overriding comorbidity but is simply a key element in the overall milieu of multiple conditions (39, 40). In a few instances, however, participants discussed that their experiences were associated with HIV, long-term medication use, or side effects, although their providers attributed these conditions to normal ageing. They advised the OALWH to ‘wait’, and they will improve with time. Disagreements about the cause of a symptom or health condition may contribute to doubts about the effectiveness of treatment or conceal an emerging disease and contribute to delayed diagnoses such as medication side effects and polypharmacy. A few of the OALWH in our study resorted to alternative forms of management, e.g. prayers and traditional medicine, after their conditions failed to improve following medical intervention. Overall, there is an urgent need to integrate other chronic diseases into HIV care and train staff on how best to attend to the unique needs of OALWH.

Mental health challenges

Our findings of substantial reports of common mental disorder symptoms among OALWH are consistent with previous reports of poor mental health among PLWH in the study setting, albeit among younger populations (41, 42). However, our study does not establish whether the burden among OALWH is higher or lower than that observed among young PLWH. Quantitative studies are needed to confirm this comparison. Nonetheless, OALWH may be facing a higher burden of common mental disorders than their younger counterparts for different reasons. Firstly, many of the longest surviving OALWH may be significantly impacted by the legacy of the early years of the epidemic, including multiple bereavements, ‘survivor guilt’ and post-traumatic stress disorder. Living for many years with an uncertain prognosis, financial challenges, and a historical and ongoing stigma may indeed contribute to a high burden of anxiety and depression in this cohort (43). Secondly, the higher burden may also be attributed to the multiple challenges that OALWH face, e.g. poverty, food insecurity, caregiving responsibility, double-stigma, and the onset of physical body changes, as evidenced in our study. Our results are also partly corroborated by findings from other settings in SSA. For instance, Charlotte and colleagues reported a high prevalence of severe depression among OALWH in West Africa, especially among those who were unemployed, current or former smokers (44). In other studies, OALWH have been noted to have lower rates of common mental disorders than uninfected age peers or younger PLWH (45). The current study did not quantify these problems, and future studies need to do so.

Since the beginning of the HIV epidemic, the manifestations of cognitive and neurological problems have been ubiquitous and frequently associated with poor treatment outcomes and impairment of activities of daily living (11). In our study, the most frequently reported cognitive problem was memory difficulty, which was commonly associated with stress and shame. Strikingly, healthcare providers seldom suspected cognitive impairments among OALWH and screenings were never done. This is a huge blow in detecting and managing these symptoms and contributes to the increased burden of stress and discomfort in this patient cohort. This observation is similar to what has been reported in South Africa (40, 46). Despite the reported memory challenges in this study, OALWH rarely forgot to take their medications (from their own self-reports and that of their providers). This finding is not unique in the HIV literature (47). It is possible that OALWH are more organized and experienced, and possibly more motivated after experiencing the initial devastating outcomes of the HIV pandemic. There could also be a survivor effect, where those living longer are those likely to be more adherent while those that were more forgetful were non-adherent and succumbed to AIDS. However, it is still essential to monitor the cognitive function of these adults to prevent treatment non-adherence, considering the multiple challenges they face, which are likely to impact their cognitive function.

Our findings also noted a section of OALWH at risk of substance use dependence, especially home-brewed alcohol (for both men and women) and smokeless tobacco (mainly women). This is not surprising given that the consumption of mnazi (the local palm wine) is known to take precedence among the inhabitants of Kilifi because it is cheap and often less regulated (48). In the current study, OALWH residing in the most interior parts (away from periurban areas), those working in mnazi drinking dens (especially older women), and those experiencing family conflicts were regarded to be most at risk of this problem. While it is true that a significant number of OALWH stop taking drugs and substances following HIV diagnosis, as noted in previous studies (ref), there are still some who abuse drugs and substances, leading to poor overall health and treatment outcomes. The need to address this problem is even more crucial since it was associated with rising cases of sexual risk-taking behaviour in this cohort, including cross-generational sex, multiple sex partners and non-condom use.

Psychosocial challenges

Psychosocial factors are well-known predictors of treatment adherence, disease progression and quality of life for PLWH. Stigma and loneliness, for instance, are highly linked with mental ill-health in OALWH (49). Unlike social determinants of health (e.g. economic stability and education), psychosocial factors are considered more malleable, resulting in improved health status (8). Hence, understanding the psychosocial needs of OALWH is critical to developing interventions aimed at improving their overall health. Findings from our exploratory study suggest that financial difficulties, loneliness, stigma, and discrimination are prevalent among OALWH in the study setting and are associated with mental complaints (e.g. persistent stress) and physical health problems (e.g. worsening other conditions and poor treatment outcomes). These findings are not surprising given the prevailing situation of older adults in the country, especially those residing in rural areas. According to Help Age Kenya, the majority of older people in Kenya, especially those in rural areas, live in absolute poverty (50). Besides, individuals aged ≥50 years are the poorest age group in the country, and the majority have no formal sources of income; hence no pension to fall back on in their old age. In Western Kenya, Kiplagat and colleagues identified lack of support, HIV-related stigma, ageism, poor patient-provider communication as some of the key challenges facing OALWH when seeking HIV care services (26). In our study, although many OALWH lived in multigenerational households, very few reported receiving instrumental support. A recent report, the National Gender and Equality Commission Report, dubbed ‘Whipping Wisdom’, also established that older adults in Kenya faced various forms of violence, including social stigma, neglect, abandonment, and hindrance from using and disposal of property (51). Similar to our study, the drivers of such violence include land succession disputes, accusations of witchcraft, poverty and degrading family and community values. Elder abuse is also recognized worldwide as a serious problem (52). The issue cannot be adequately resolved if the essential needs of older people (especially those at risk of poor health like OALWH) – for food, shelter, security and access to healthcare are not met. There is a need to create an environment where ageing is accepted as a natural part of the life cycle and where ageist stereotypes are discouraged.

Implications

Our study highlights opportunities for interventions and further research. Most importantly, interventions for this unique population must be contextualized by both age and sex. It is important to reiterate that the health challenges faced by OALWH at the coast of Kenya are often interconnected and require a cohesive and collaborative response to achieve maximum benefits. Such interventions should target modifiable factors such as emotional support and integrate needed social and community support, e.g. case management services, food and nutrition support, financial assistance with caregiving responsibilities, and transportation. Context-specific interventions to help OALWH develop and nurture their own coping strategies are also critical in this population. Patient-centred care and patient self-management principles (e.g. self-reliance and empowerment) are critical elements in chronic care and are advocated as universal strategies in international frameworks of chronic care (53). While OALWH are the primary target of most of the existing interventions in this cohort (54-56), research is required on how to build the capacity of healthcare providers, family members who act as informal caregivers and friends to provide support and care to those ageing with HIV. Future work should also examine the impacts of poverty on HIV care for OALWH as our results indicate that financial challenges influence many of these problems. Yet, it is essential to note that despite the health challenges discussed by participants, all the OALWH were currently receiving HIV care. Future research should also examine the resources and resilience among these individuals to fully understand the vital role of resilience in empowering OALWH to enact processes that buffer health from the identified stressors. There is also a need for future research to quantify the existing burden of physical and mental challenges in this population in Kilifi and confirm the risk and protective factors to these challenges. Furthermore, there is an urgent need for research to pilot and test the applicability and effectiveness of interventions underlying the determinants of physical and mental impairments in this setting.

Strengths and limitations

To our knowledge, this is the first study to richly explore the health challenges of OALWH at the coast of Kenya and among the few studies in Kenya. Unlike previous studies, a key strength of this work is that participants comprised a diverse group of stakeholders, including clinicians, community-based organizations, caregivers apart from the OALWH themselves. This ensured that the views were diverse and contrasted across the different participant groups. The use of a biopsychosocial model helped us to obtain a richer insight into the complexity of the identified health challenges across the three domains in Kilifi. However, our findings emanate from a predominantly rural setting, and circumstances may differ from those in urban areas. Only OALWH who were on long-term HIV treatment were interviewed in this study; thus, their circumstances may also differ from those who are not in care or the newly diagnosed. Relatedly, there may be a survivor effect in the study population where OALWH who are most sick are unable to seek care, hence not part of the studied population. As is the norm for qualitative studies in general, data collection, analysis, and interpretation are subject to individual influences; nonetheless, we countered this effect by maintaining reflexivity and constant discussion with the research team to provide rigour and credibility to the study.