Female gender, depressive symptoms, manual job, and higher physical disability predict long term low back pain persistence

Introduction

Non-specific Low Back Pain (LBP) is one of the most common health problems in societies and is strongly associated with poor self-rated general health [1-4]. It causes severe long-term pain, disability, work absenteeism, and an increased use of healthcare services [1,2].

LBP is traditionally divided into acute (pain of less than 6 weeks), sub-acute (6 to 12 weeks) or chronic (more than 12 weeks) symptom duration [5]. The typical course of acute is initially favorable, i.e., is characterized by a marked reduction in the mean of pain and disability in the first 6 weeks [6]. However, from this point forward, the improvement slows down and the probability of developing a persistent and disabling back pain condition (CLBP – Chronic Low Back Pain) increases for approximately 40% of the patients [6,7]. Some of these patients will recover, but a minority will develop a persistent disabling condition. This minority is responsible for most of the social and health costs associated with LBP [8], to which absenteeism and reduced productivity costs must be added [9].

To better address the individual consequences of persistent disabling LBP on patients and eventually define more appropriate treatment solutions, an improved understanding of its long-term prognosis is needed. Traditionally, LBP episodes have been understood and examined as episodic, recurrent but unrelated [10,11]. Thus, most of the published research is focused on the evaluation of a single episode or presence of pain or disability at specific time-points. It is, therefore, often difficult to know whether a particular study includes individuals with an initial episode of LBP or/and individuals with an exacerbation of a recurrent LBP condition [12,13].

The population-based studies with long-term follow-up (5 to 10 years) published to date have shown that LBP is a persistent long-term condition with a variable clinical course and multiple interrelated episodes [14-21]. Despite differences in the case definition or in the assessment time-points, only 6 to 14% of adults enrolled in these studies reported pain at all specific time-points of the follow-up [18,19]. In contrast, 23 to 35% of the population studied reported that they were “painless at the time of evaluation” [16-18] or had “no day of pain during the previous year” [20]. These results suggest that there is a considerable percentage of individuals reporting pain at a given time who fully recover, while others maintain some level of pain and disability over time, with a small subgroup reporting persistent and potentially disabling pain [16,18-20]. Consequently, the clinical course based on the population mean may not adequately reflect the within-person variation in LBP experienced by individuals, opening the possibility of classifying LBP in clinically relevant subgroups [16,19].

The Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases Cohort Study (EpiDoC), being a population-based study with prolonged follow-up [22-24], produced a set of data that could help identify distinct LBP courses and investigate its impact on disability and quality of life. On the other hand, the presence of distinct clinical courses among LBP patients opens the possibility of identifying prognostic indicators for a persistent LBP course. Although a set of indicators has been associated with the development of persistent and disabling pain [25-30], the majority have emerged from studies that have evaluated pain at a single point of time, with follow-up limited to 1 year [31,32]. The identification of predictors of more disabling LBP course might allow healthcare professionals to better identify the patients at high-risk of persistent disabling symptoms, and eventually change their long-term prognosis through forms of treatment that best fit and respond to their characteristics [16].

The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of different LBP course patterns across 5 years, to examine its cumulative impact on disability and HRQoL and to compare the contribution of socio-demographic, lifestyle, psychosocial and symptom-related indicators to persistent LBP, using data from the EpiDoC.

Materials and Methods

This study used a longitudinal analysis of active CLBP patients’ data from the EpiDoC. The EpiDoC began with the EpiDoC 1 study (EpiReumaPt) in 2011-13. EpiReumaPt was a population-based study with a representative sample of the Portuguese population, comprised of 10.661 non-institutionalized adults (≥18 years), living in Portugal and able to speak and read the Portuguese language [22,23]. From there, and over a 5-year period, two subsequent time-points of data collection (every 18 months) have been completed, using data based on the same participants [24]. The detailed procedures for the study design and sample selection and recruitment are published elsewhere [23]. Local and regional ethical committees granted ethical approval for this study. All patients gave informed consent after receiving written and oral information about the study [22,23].

This study’s sample consists of all the individuals recruited under the EpiReumaPt study who self-reported active CLBP on the day of the interview [4]. Active CLBP was defined as pain located in the lower back, between the lower thorax and the gluteal folds, that was present most of the time for a minimum period of 90 days, and without a specific cause. Individuals with a diagnosis of other spinal pain (neck or dorsal back pain) or with LBP lasting less than 90 days were excluded [4].

For the purposes of this study, a more stringent case definition was used. Participants who reported “no pain/discomfort” at baseline when answering to question 4 of the Euroqol, 5 dimensions, 3 levels (EQ-5D-3L) (Regarding pain/discomfort please indicate which statement best describes your health today?), were excluded. Finally, only those participants who participated in all the time-points of data collection (baseline and time-points 2 and 3) were included in the final analysis.

At baseline, data were collected in face-to-face interviews by trained research assessors (RA) based on a standardized questionnaire which included self-report instruments of disability, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and anxiety and depressive symptoms. At the follow-up time-points, the RA collected the same self-report measures of disability and HRQoL through telephone interviews. To prevent withdrawals, when a participant was not available, a maximum of 6 additional attempts were made at different times [24].

CLBP course across 5 years was represented by a three-digit variable based on the participants’ answer to question 4 of the EQ-5D-3L: from left to right, the first digit stands for CLBP status at baseline, the second for the pain status at time-point 2, and the third for the pain status at time-point 3.

Results

Of the 1.201 selected participants with active CLBP at baseline (time-point 1), 634 (52.8%) completed all the time-points of data collection (complete data on main outcomes - EQ5D index and HAQ). Non-responders at time-point 2 and/or 3 were lost due to unsuccessful contact and for other reasons (participants refused to sign the consent form for follow-up, expressed the wish to leave the study, had an invalid contact or have died) (Fig 1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Fig 1. Flow diagram of recruitment

At baseline, no statistically significant differences in socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were found between responders and non-responders, except for HRQoL (EQ-5D-3L index, p=0.005), with responders reporting a statistically significantly lower HRQoL. The participants were aged 61.6 ± 13.6 years, predominantly females (78.4%) and with a low educational level (64.4%). Considering the 3 time-points of data collection, 400 (63.1%) participants were classified as having a persistent LBP course and 234 (36.9%) as having a relapsing LBP course. Of the 234 participants classified with a relapsing LBP course, 63 (26.9%) reported no pain in time-points 2 and 3 (pain/no pain/no pain), 49 (20.9%), an intermittent pattern of pain (pain/no pain/pain), and 122 (52.1%), reported no pain only in the third time-point (pain/pain/no pain). The characteristics of the relapsing and persistent subgroups are presented in Table 1. Statistically significant differences were found between groups for age (p=0.008), educational level (p=0.001), HRQoL (EQ-5D-3L Index, p=0.005) and disability (p=0.005). The participants in the persistent subgroup are older and less educated, have higher levels of disability and lower HRQoL (Table 2). Moreover, statistically significant associations were found between gender (p≤0.005), anxiety (p=0.024) and depressive symptoms (p≤0.005), and the type of LBP condition (relapsing or persistent).

Discussion

The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of different LBP symptoms’ courses during a follow-up period of 5 years, to examine its cumulative impact on disability and HRQoL and to quantify the contribution of different prognostic indicators in predicting the long-term persistence of symptoms. To our knowledge, this is the first large prospective study that addresses the long-term course and prognosis of a restricted sample of active CLBP patients. Its results provide evidence for different symptoms’ courses among people classified as chronic patients according to the traditional temporal categorization of LBP, suggesting that classifying LBP simply as acute or chronic is insufficient [5-17], and supporting the current understanding of LBP as a relapsing condition of interrelated episodes of pain [11,14,18-20,40].

In this study, 26.9% of participants reported at least one time-period of complete remission of LBP symptoms. This result is consistent with other long-term population studies’ findings that reported values of pain-free people in all follow-up points between 23 and 35% [18-20]. Contrary to previous studies, the proportion of participants that had reported a persistent symptoms’ course at all follow-up points (63.1%) was substantially higher, with values ranging from 6 to 29% [18-20]. These differences might be explained in part by differences in sample characteristics [7], or the long-standing LBP definition used and data collection methods [18-20,41]. In this study, and since no questions were made to participants regarding their LBP symptoms between time-points, it is possible that the persistent group includes people with continuous mild pain with low impact and people with a fluctuating symptoms course that varies between severe pain episodes with a large impact on their live and pain-free periods [15].

The results obtained regarding the course of disability and HRQoL seem to support this relapsing course of LBP symptoms. Despite statistically significant differences between groups at all follow-up time-points, both groups share a similar relapsing pain pattern over time. Nevertheless, it is important to highlight that statistically significant differences found between the baseline and time-point 3 indicate that disability decreases over time in the relapsing group and increases over time in the persistent group. Comparisons of this study’s findings with other studies are difficult since those designed to describe the long-term course of disability and/or HRQoL are rare.

The present study explored potential prognostic indicators for persistent LBP. Although there is a vast amount of studies dedicated to risk factors for the onset of LBP or concerned with the transition of acute to CLBP, few studies investigated prognostic indicators for persistent CLBP over periods of more than 1 year. In this study, being female, have a manual job, presenting positive depressive symptoms, and reporting disability, increases the chances of a persistent long-lasting LBP. These indicators are consistent with findings reported in other studies [42-46].

Overall, the four indicators identified show a moderate ability to distinguish between relapsing and persistent courses (AUC 0.70). This result limits the capacity of these indicators to identify at presentation patients who are at risk for persistent disabling symptoms, and suggests that other potential prognostic factors (e.g., physical, or psychosocial) should be considered to predict persistent LBP.

Conclusions

The results of this study provide evidence on the long-term course of back pain and suggested that people with CLBP might have different clinical courses ahead and different prognosis in the long-term. It also provides relevant information about how persistent CLBP might affect disability and HRQoL over time. Depressive and female patients that have a manual job and report disability, have higher chances to develop a persistent long-lasting LBP.