Risk of Long Covid in people infected with SARS-CoV-2 after two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine: community-based, matched cohort study

Introduction

Long-term symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection, often referred to as Long Covid, post-COVID-19 syndrome, post-acute COVID-19 syndrome, post-COVID condition, or post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection, affect approximately 2% of the UK population, with two-thirds of these individuals experiencing functional impairment [1]. COVID-19 vaccines reduce rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection [2] and transmission [3] and therefore Long Covid incidence. However, it is unclear to what extent vaccination reduces the risk of developing Long Covid symptoms following breakthrough infection, with mixed evidence to date [4,5].

To 25 January 2022, 16% of the UK population eligible for a second vaccination were yet to receive it [6], while vaccine coverage was lowest in disadvantaged groups, including ethnic minorities and deprived communities, where rates of infection have been highest [7]. Understanding the role of vaccines in Long Covid may therefore aid public health messaging and facilitate informed decision-making regarding vaccine uptake. We investigated whether infection following two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine is associated with a reduction in Long Covid symptoms after 12 weeks, relative to being unvaccinated when infected.

Methods

Results

Of 3,333 eligible participants who were double-vaccinated before their first test-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 3,090 (92.7%) were 1:1 matched to participants who were unvaccinated when infected (from a pool of 9,854 potential control participants). Among double-vaccinated participants, 2,287 (74.0%), 788 (25.5%) and 15 (0.5%) received Oxford/AstraZeneca, Pfizer/BioNTech, and Moderna vaccines, respectively.

Most double-vaccinated participants (3,057, 98.9%) were infected after 17 May 2021, when the Delta variant dominated in the UK, while nearly all unvaccinated participants (3,082, 99.7%) were infected before this date. Median follow-up for Long Covid ≥12 weeks after infection among double-vaccinated and unvaccinated participants was 96 (IQR: 90 to 104) and 98 (89 to 109) days, respectively. After matching, socio-demographic characteristics were generally well balanced for all variables except age (mean 49 versus 47 years for double-vaccinated versus unvaccinated, absolute standardized difference 19.6%) (Table 1).

At follow-up, Long Covid symptoms of any severity were reported by 294 double-vaccinated participants (prevalence 9.5%; 95% CI: 8.5% to 10.6%) versus 452 unvaccinated participants (14.6%; 13.4% to 15.9%), and activity-limiting symptoms by 170 (5.5%; 4.8% to 6.4%) and 268 (8.7%; 7.7% to 9.7%) participants, respectively.

The aOR were 0.59 (0.50 to 0.69) for Long Covid of any severity and 0.59 (0.48 to 0.73) for activity-limiting symptoms in those infected after double vaccination compared with those who were infected when unvaccinated (Figure 1). There was no evidence of heterogeneity by time from infection to follow-up (p=0.65 for symptoms of any severity; p=0.68 for activity-limiting symptoms), or between participants receiving adenovirus vector or mRNA vaccines (p=0.25 for symptoms of any severity; p=0.35 for activity-limiting symptoms).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1.

Adjusted odds ratios for Long Covid symptoms ≥12 weeks after first infection, comparing matched study participants who were double-vaccinated or unvaccinated (reference group) before infection

Odds ratios adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics (age, sex, white or non-white ethnicity, country/region of residence, area deprivation quintile group, and self-reported, pre-existing health/disability status) and time from infection to follow-up for Long Covid. Confidence intervals are at the 95% level.

Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the aOR increased when removing time from infection to follow-up for Long Covid from the matching set (to 0.68 [0.56 to 0.81] for the primary outcome), and further increased when it was also omitted from the covariate set in adjusted models (0.73 [0.62 to 0.85]) (Supplementary Table 1). However, the aOR remained below 1 in all analyses.

Discussion

We found that receiving two COVID-19 vaccinations at least two weeks before SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with a 41% decrease in the odds of developing Long Covid symptoms 12 weeks later, relative to not being vaccinated when infected. Our results extend those already published, whereby the risk of Long Covid was approximately halved in people who were double-vaccinated when infected compared with those who were unvaccinated, but at four rather than 12 weeks of follow-up [4]. Conclusions based on healthcare records rather than self-report (as in our study) are less clear, with vaccination associated with reduced rates of only specific symptoms [5] and diagnoses [9], though under-presentation, under-diagnosis, and under-recording are all possible [10]. In addition to reducing the risk of Long Covid after breakthrough infection, evidence also suggests that the likelihood and severity of pre-existing Long Covid symptoms may be reduced after vaccination [11,12].

The main study strength is that the CIS comprises a large sample of participants randomly selected from the population to minimise selection bias. Participants are routinely tested for SARS-CoV-2 at follow-up visits, therefore our study includes both asymptomatic and symptomatic infections, as well as self-reported tests. We adjusted for multiple factors related to vaccination uptake [7] and long-term symptoms [13]. However, as with any observational study, some unmeasured confounding may remain. In particular, because the question on Long Covid was not introduced until 3 February 2021, shortly after mass COVID-19 vaccination started in the UK on 8 December 2020, one key limitation is that it was not possible to match double-vaccinated and unvaccinated participants on calendar time of infection (Supplementary Figure 1). Differences in the likelihood of developing Long Covid symptoms between exposure groups may therefore partly reflect changes in the dominant COVID-19 variant or other period effects. Our key exposure was double vaccination, despite third and booster doses now being available, and the study period was before the Omicron variant became widespread. We were not able to investigate participants who were single-vaccinated when infected because nearly all of these received their second dose within the 12-week follow-up period, confounding any relationship between one dose at infection and Long Covid symptoms.

In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 infection after double vaccination is associated with a reduced risk of developing Long Covid symptoms at 12 weeks compared with infection before vaccination, emphasising the need for public health initiatives to increase population-level vaccine uptake. Studies with longer follow-up are needed to assess the impact of booster doses and the Omicron variant and to evaluate symptom trajectories beyond a single 12-week follow-up visit, particularly given the relapsing nature of Long Covid [14]. Further research into possible biological explanations behind our findings, which may inform therapeutic strategies for Long Covid, is also required.

Footnotes