Summary
Background SARS-CoV-2 infections and hospitalizations are rising in the US and other countries after the emergence of the Omicron variant. Currently, data on infection rates, severity and racial/ethnic and gender disparities from Omicron in the US is limited.
Method We performed a retrospective cohort study of a large, geographically diverse database of patient electronic health records (EHRs) in the US. The study population comprised 881,473 patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection for the first time between 9/1/2021-1/16/2022, including 147,964 patients infected when Omicron predominated (Omicron cohort), 633,581 when Delta predominated (Delta cohort) and another 99,928 infected when the Delta predominated but just before the Omicron variant was detected in the US (Delta-2 cohort). We examined monthly incidence rates of COVID-19 infections stratified by age groups, gender, race and ethnicity, compared severe clinical outcomes including emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and mechanical ventilation use between propensity-score matched Omicron and Delta cohorts stratified by age groups (0-4, 5-17, 18-64 and ≥ 65 years), and examined racial/ethnic and gender differences in severe clinical outcomes.
Findings Among 147,964 infected patients in the Omicron cohort (average age: 39.1 years), 56.7% were female, 2.4% Asian, 21.1% Black, 6.2% Hispanic, and 51.8% White. The monthly incidence rate of COVID infections (new cases per 1000 persons per day) was 0.5-0.7 when Delta predominated, and rapidly increased to 3.8-5.2 when Omicron predominated. In January 2022, the infection rate was highest in children under 5 years (11.0) among all age groups, higher in Black than in White patients (14.0 vs. 3.8), and higher in Hispanic than in non-Hispanic patients (8.9 vs. 3.1). After propensity-score matching for demographics, socio-economic determinants of health, comorbidities and medications, risks for severe clinical outcomes in the Omicron cohort were significantly lower than in the Delta cohort: ED visits: 10.2% vs. 14.6% (risk ratio or RR: 0.70 [0.68-0.71]); hospitalizations: 2.6% vs. 4.4% (RR: 0.58 [0.55-0.60]); ICU admissions: 0.47% vs. 1.00% (RR: 0.47 [0.43-0.51]); mechanical ventilation: 0.08% vs. 0.3% (RR: 0.25 [0.20-0.31]). Similar reduction in disease severity was observed for all age groups. There were significant racial/ethnic and gender disparities in severe clinical outcomes in the Omicron cohort, with Black, Hispanic patients having more ED visits and ICU admissions than White and non-Hispanic patients, respectively and women had fewer hospitalization and ICU admission than men.
Interpretation The incidence rate of COVID infection during the omicron predominant period (prevalence >92%) was 6-8 times higher than during the Delta predominant period that preceded it consistent with greater infectivity. The incidence rate was highest among those less than 5 years of age, and in Black and Hispanic patients. COVID infections occurring when the Omicron predominated were associated with significantly less frequent severe outcomes than in matched patients when the Delta variant predominated. There were significant racial, ethnic and gender disparities in severe clinical outcomes, with Black and Hispanic patients and men disproportionally impacted.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
National Institute on Aging (grants nos. AG057557, AG061388, AG062272), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (grant no. R01AA029831), National Institute on Drug Abuse (grant no. UG1DA049435), the Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative (CTSC) of Cleveland (grant no. 1UL1TR002548-01), National Cancer Institute Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (R25CA221718, P30 CA043703, P20 CA2332216).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The data used in this study was collected from the TriNetX COVID-19 Research Network, which provided access to electronic medical records (diagnoses, procedures, medications, laboratory values, genomic information) from approximately 90 million patients from 66 healthcare organizations. TriNetX, LLC is compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). TriNetX is certified to the ISO 27001:2013 standard and maintains an Information Security Management System (ISMS) to ensure the protection of the healthcare data it has access to and to meet the requirements of the HIPAA Security Rule. Any data displayed on the TriNetX Platform in aggregate form, or any patient level data provided in a data set generated by the TriNetX Platform, only contains de-identified data as per the de-identification standard defined in Section 164.514(a) of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. The process by which the data is de-identified is attested to through a formal determination by a qualified expert as defined in Section 164.514(b)(1) of the HIPAA Privacy Rule (reference). This formal determination by a qualified expert, refreshed in December 2020, supersedes the need for TriNetX's previous waiver from the Western Institutional Review Board (IRB). All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived. In addition, MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio, IRB has determined any research using TriNetX, is not Human Subject Research and therefore exempt from IRB review.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
