Abstract
Background Understanding the relationship between electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other respiratory conditions is critical. However, previous studies have not adequately controlled for history of cigarette smoking.
Research Question To examine the prospective association between ENDS use and self-reported incident COPD after adjusting for cigarette smoking history.
Study Design and Methods Using waves 1-5 of the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, we examined the association between ENDS use and self-reported incident COPD among adults aged 40+ using discrete time survival models. Current ENDS use was measured as a time-varying covariate, lagged by one wave, defined as established daily or some days use. We controlled for baseline demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, education), health characteristics (asthma, obesity, exposure to second-hand smoke), and smoking history (smoking status and cigarette pack-years).
Results Incident COPD was self-reported by 925 respondents during the five-year follow-up period. Prior to adjusting for other covariates, time-varying ENDS use appeared to nearly double the risk of incident COPD (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.44-2.74). However, ENDS use was no longer significantly associated with COPD (aHR 1.10, 95% CI 0.78-1.57) after adjusting for current cigarette smoking and cigarette pack-years. The risk of self-reported incident COPD increased with cigarette pack-years and was higher for respondents who were older, female, less educated, and had baseline asthma or obesity.
Interpretation ENDS use did not significantly increase the risk of self-reported incident COPD over a five-year period once current smoking status and cigarette pack-years were taken into account. Cigarette pack-years, on the other hand, remained associated with a net increase in the risk of self-reported incident COPD. These findings highlight the importance of using prospective longitudinal data and properly controlling for cigarette smoking history to assess the independent health effects of ENDS.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by NIH/FDA grant U54CA229974. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or the FDA.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study involves publicly available data from the US Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study, accessible via the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR): https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/NAHDAP/studies/36231
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement: All authors report no conflicts of interest or disclosures.
Funding statement: Supported by NIH/FDA grant U54CA229974. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or the FDA.
Data Availability
All data used is publicly available