ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate medication guideline adherence among ambulatory patients with markedly elevated blood pressure (BP), overall and by patient characteristics.
Design Population-based, retrospective cohort study.
Setting Yale New Haven Health System.
Participants Adult patients aged 18-85 years with markedly elevated BP (defined as two consecutive outpatient visits with systolic BP ≥160 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥100 mmHg) between October 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2018.
Main outcome measures We assessed the number and class of antihypertensive drugs (previously taken and newly prescribed) prior to 90 days of the second visit with BP ≥160/100 mmHg. Among patients treated with two-drug class regimens, we assessed the proportion of patients on guideline-recommended two drug classes, overall and stratified by documentation of prior myocardial infarction (MI), diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and uncomplicated hypertension (i.e., without MI, coronary artery disease, diabetes, CKD, and cerebrovascular disease).
Results We identified 16,377 patients with markedly elevated BP. They had a mean age of 65.8 (SD: 14.5) years; 54.0% were female; and 69.4%, 19.6%, and 9.6% were White, Black, and Hispanic, respectively. Prior to 90 days of the second visit, 29.8% had no active antihypertensive drug prescription, 20.0% had one drug class prescribed, and 50.2% had two or more drug classes prescribed. Among patients prescribed one antihypertensive drug class, the most common drug class was angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), followed by calcium channel blocker (CCB). Among patients prescribed two antihypertensive drug classes, the most common treatment combinations were ACEI or ARB and thiazide diuretic (21.0%), followed by ACEI or ARB and CCB (20.6%). Guideline-recommended two-drug class combination therapy were prescribed in 54.3% of the treated population, with the highest proportion of 67.0% in patients with a prior MI and the lowest proportion of 48.2% among patients with CKD. Older age, lower body mass index, and lower BP were associated with lower prescription of guideline-recommended combination therapy.
Conclusion Only half of patients with markedly elevated BP were prescribed guideline-recommended antihypertensive combination drugs. Major opportunities exist for improving the guideline adherence of antihypertensive drug prescription in this population.
Section 1: What is already known on this subject?Hypertension affects nearly one in two adults in the United States, of whom 20% have markedly elevated blood pressure (BP; defined as BP ≥160/100 mmHg). People with markedly elevated BP have increased risks of adverse cardiovascular and kidney events. Clinical guidelines recommend prescribing combination therapy with two or more antihypertensive agents for patients with markedly elevated BP.
Section 2: What this study adds This study quantified the real-world medication guideline adherence among ambulatory patients with markedly elevated BP, using electronic health record data from a large health system in the United States. Prior to 90 days of the second visit with BP ≥160/100 mmHg, nearly 30% of patients had no active antihypertensive drug prescription. Among patients prescribed at least one antihypertensive drug class, guideline-recommended two-drug class combination therapy were prescribed in 54% of patients, with the highest proportion of 67% in patients with a prior myocardial infarction and the lowest proportion of 48% among patients with chronic kidney disease. These findings highlight a large missed opportunity for improving the guideline adherence of antihypertensive drug prescription in this population.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr. Lu is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K12HL138037) and the Yale Center for Implementation Science. In the past three years, Dr. Krumholz received expenses and/or personal fees from UnitedHealth, Element Science, Aetna, Reality Labs, Johnson & Johnson, the Siegfried and Jensen Law Firm, Arnold and Porter Law Firm, Martin/Baughman Law Firm, and F-Prime. He is a co-founder of Refactor Health and HugoHealth, and is associated with contracts, through Yale New Haven Hospital, from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Dr. Schulz collaborates with the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases in Beijing; is a technical consultant to HugoHealth, a personal health information platform, and co-founder of Refactor Health, an AI-augmented data management platform for healthcare; is a consultant for Interpace Diagnostics Group, a molecular diagnostics company. Dr. Ross currently receives research support through Yale University from Johnson and Johnson to develop methods of clinical trial data sharing, from the Medical Device Innovation Consortium as part of the National Evaluation System for Health Technology (NEST), from the Food and Drug Administration for the Yale-Mayo Clinic Center for Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI) program (U01FD005938); from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS022882), from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01HS025164, R01HL144644), and from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation to establish the Good Pharma Scorecard at Bioethics International. In the past 36 months, NDS has received research support through Mayo Clinic from the Food and Drug Administration to establish Yale-Mayo Clinic Center for Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI) program (U01FD005938); the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Innovation under the Transforming Clinical Practice Initiative (TCPI); the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS025164; R01HS025402; R03HS025517; K12HS026379); the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R56HL130496; R01HL131535; R01HL151662); the National Science Foundation; from the Medical Device Innovation Consortium as part of the National Evaluation System for Health Technology (NEST)and the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) to develop a Clinical Data Research Network (LHSNet).
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study received an exemption for review from the Institutional Review Board at Yale University because EHR data are de-identified.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Technical appendix, statistical code, and dataset available from the corresponding author.
