ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION We evaluated a new Simoa plasma assay for phosphorylated tau at aa217 enhanced by additional ptau sites (p217+tau).
METHODS Plasma p217+tau levels were compared to 18F-NAV4694 amyloid-beta (Aβ) PET and 18F-MK6240 tau PET in 174 cognitively impaired (CI) and 223 cognitively unimpaired (CU) participants.
RESULTS Compared to Aβ-CU, the plasma levels of p217+tau increased two-fold in Aβ+ CU and 3.5-fold in Aβ+ CI. In Aβ-the p217+tau levels did not significantly differ between CU, MCI or dementia. P217+tau correlated with Aβ centiloids ρ=0.67 (CI 0.64; CU 0.45) and tau SUVRMT ρ=0.63 (CI 0.69; CU 0.34). Area under curve (AUC) for AD vs Aβ-CU was 0.94, for AD vs other dementia was 0.93, for Aβ+ vs Aβ– PET was 0.89 and for tau+ vs tau-PET was 0.89.
DISCUSSION Plasma p217+tau levels elevate early in the AD continuum and correlate well with Aβ and tau PET.
Research in Context
Systematic review: The authors reviewed the literature using PubMed, meeting abstracts and presentations. Plasma phospho-tau measures compare well to PET and post-mortem across the continuum of AD but accuracy varies across ptau target sites and assay methods. There are no reports comparing PET to plasma assays targeting multiple sites of tau phosphorylation as typically found in AD. The p217+tau assay targets p217 with binding enhanced by phosphorylation at additional sites such as aa212.
Interpretation: Plasma p217+tau elevates early and correlates with both Aβ and tau as measured by PET indicating that tau phosphorylation is an early event in AD and occurs with Aβ deposition. Plasma p217+tau measurement should assist both selection for trials and diagnosis of AD.
Future directions: Further validation studies, head-to-head comparison to other assays, assessing the influence of co-morbidities and the ability to measure change in brain Aβ and tau levels are required.
Competing Interest Statement
Funding. The research was supported by the Australian Federal Government through NHMRC grants APP1132604, APP1140853 and APP1152623 and by a grant from Enigma Australia. Janssen Pharmaceuticals paid a commercial data access fee to the AIBL study of aging. Conflicts of interest/Competing interests. Christopher C. Rowe has received research grants from NHMRC, Enigma Australia, Biogen, Eisai and Abbvie. He is on the scientific advisory board for Cerveau Technologies and consulted for Prothena, Eisai, Roche and Biogen Australia. Victor Villemagne is and has been a consultant or paid speaker at sponsored conference sessions for Eli Lilly, Life Molecular Imaging, GE Healthcare, Abbvie, Lundbeck, Shanghai Green Valley Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, and Hoffmann La Roche. Ziad Saad, Gallen Triana-Baltzer, Randy Slemmon and Hartmuth Kolb are employees of Janssen R&D. The other authors did not report any conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
The research was supported by the Australian Federal Government through NHMRC grants APP1132604, APP1140853 and APP1152623 and by a grant from Enigma Australia. Janssen Pharmaceuticals paid a commercial data access fee to the AIBL study of aging.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/18/Austin/201)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
