Abstract
Introduction Policies to mitigate climate change are essential. The objective of this paper was to estimate the impact of greenhouse gas (GHG) food taxes and assess whether such a tax could also have health benefits and reduce ethnic inequalities in health in Aotearoa NZ.
Methods We undertook a systemised review on GHG food taxes to inform four tax scenarios, including one combined with a subsidy. These scenarios were modelled to estimate lifetime impacts on quality adjusted health years (QALY), health inequities by ethnicity, GHG emissions, health system costs and food costs to the individual.
Results 28 modelling studies on food tax policies were identified. Taxes resulted in decreased consumption of the targeted foods (e.g., -15.4% in beef/ruminant consumption, N=12 studies) and an average decrease of 8.3% in GHG emissions (N=19 studies). Using this review, we conceptualized four scenarios: a GHG weighted tax on all foods; a GHG weighted tax on food groups with the highest 50% of emissions (‘high emitters’); A GHG weighted tax on ‘high emitters’ combined with a fruit and vegetable subsidy; A 20% tax on ‘high emitters’.
The ‘GHG weighted tax on all foods’ scenario had the largest health gains and costs savings (455,800 QALYs and NZ$8.8 billion), followed by the tax-subsidy scenario (410,400 QALYs and NZ$6.4 billion). All scenarios were associated with reduced GHG emissions (between 4.2% and 7.0% of the baseline GHG emissions from food). Age standardised per capita QALYs were between 1.6 and 2.1 times higher for Māori than non-Māori.
Conclusion Applying taxes that target foods with high GHG emissions has the potential to be effective for reducing GHG emissions and to result in co-benefits for population health. Combining a GHG food tax with a fruit and vegetable subsidy may help reduce the negative effects on household food expenditure of such a tax.
What is already known on this topic Modelling studies investigating the impact of food taxes have shown taxes aimed at high GHG emitting foods reduce consumption of ruminant meats and GHG emissions. No reviews of modelling studies of GHG motivated food taxes have been published.
What this study adds Modelling studies are reviewed and summarised and used to inform modelling of four GHG motivated tax scenarios. Modelled results identify a tax/subsidy with positive impacts on population health (410,400 total or 93.2 quality adjusted life years per 1000 people over their lifetime), health system costs (NZD 6.4 billion savings), ethnic health equity (health gains were 1.6 times higher for NZ’s indigenous population, Māori than non-Māori), GHG emissions (−4.2%) and cost of diets (−0.5%).
How this study might affect research, practice or policy Policymakers can use these findings in designing a food tax to benefit both climate and population health, utilising these detailed results on factors that affect population wellbeing.
Competing Interest Statement
Authors have been funded by the Health Research Council of NZ, as acknowledged in the sources of support section. Additional funding the authors have received to carry out work unrelated to this paper include from Horticulture NZ (CC) and Te Hiringa Hauora, Health Promotion Agency (AnM). IM is carrying out a MAppSc Advanced Nutrition Practice placement with OraTaiao: NZ Climate & Health Council (Incorporated Society) and AlM was previously an unpaid co-Convenor of this organisation.
Funding Statement
Health Research Council of New Zealand (Programme grant 16/443).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Access to the National Nutrition Survey data used in this study was provided by Statistics New Zealand under conditions designed to keep individual information secure in accordance with requirements of the Statistics Act 1975. The opinions presented are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent an official view of Statistics New Zealand. Disease data used in modelling was obtained from the New Zealand Burden of Disease Study, Global Burden of Disease Study, Virtual Diabetes Register and NZ administrative data of individually-linked data for publicly funded (and some privately funded) health events occurring in 2006-10, including hospitalizations, inpatient procedures, outpatients, pharmaceuticals, laboratories and expected primary care usage from the New Zealand Health Tracker database.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
cristina.cleghorn{at}otago.ac.nz, anja.mizdrak{at}otago.ac.nz, nhung.nghiem{at}otago.ac.nz
mulin062{at}student.otago.ac.nz, alex.macmillan{at}otago.ac.nz, jonodrew1{at}gmail.com.
antony.blakely{at}unimelb.edu.au.
c.nimhurchu{at}auckland.ac.nz.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
