ABSTRACT
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has caused disruptions to mental health services, forcing the rapid implementation of alternative ways of delivering services alongside a greater immediate, and continuously growing, demand across those services. The care and level of mental health service provided are felt to be inadequate to respond to the increasing demand for mental health conditions in the time of the pandemic, leading to an urgent need to learn from service change and consequences to inform solutions and plans to support the NHS post-pandemic plan in the UK. This rapid review aims to understand the changes in mental health services during the pandemic and summarise the impact of these changes on the health outcomes of people with mental health conditions.
Methods and analysis Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycInfowill be searched for eligible studies with key terms indicating mental health AND COVID-19 AND health services. Studies will be included if objective and subjective effects of changes to mental health services in response to COVID-19 are reported on adults with mental health conditions, peer-reviewed and published in the English language. Study selection and data extraction will be undertaken dependently by two reviewers. Evidence will be summarised narratively and in a logic model.
Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required for this review. A list of interventions/services/models of care delivered to people with mental health conditions will be grouped as “Do”, “Don’t” and “Don’t know” based on the evidence on effectiveness and acceptability. The results will be written for publication in an open-access peer-reviewed journal and disseminated to the public and patients, clinicians, commissioners, funders, and academic conferences.
PROSPERO registration number CRD42022306923
Strengths and limitations of this study
This is a rapid review with a systematic search of literature
Evidence on changes to mental health services and associated health outcomes will be examined to make practice recommendations
This review will provide the evidence base to inform solutions and plans to support the mental health service provision for the post-pandemic period
Some limitations to the study design include limited to OECD studies, exclusion of non-English studies, publication bias, quality of data, selection bias, and no quality assessment in the rapid evidence review.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project/research/work is supported by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Three Research Schools (award number: MHF018) and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) for the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) (grant number not applicable). The NIHR is the nation's largest funder of health and care research and provides the people, facilities and technology that enables research to thrive. Find out more about the NIHR.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
1. corresponding author email address was amended. 2. The in-text citation for Appendix was added.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.