Patterns of Polysubstance use among Adults in Malaysia – A Latent Class Analysis

Introduction

Polysubstance use is defined as the use of more than one non-prescribed licit or illicit substance. Licit substances include alcohol and cigarettes, while illicit substances include marijuana, cocaine, heroin, amphetamine, and methamphetamines [1]. In Malaysia, the most commonly used substances among adults were tobacco (21.3%), followed by alcohol (11.8%) and illicit drugs (0.5%), according to the findings of the National Health and Morbidity Survey (NHMS) 2019 [2]. Globally, the use of alcohol, tobacco and illicit substances are important contributors to the burden of morbidity and premature death [3]. Smoking had the highest substance-related death rate (110.7 deaths per 100 000 people), followed by alcohol and illicit drugs (33.0 and 6.9 deaths per 100 000 people, respectively) [4]. Although most of the studies focused on single substance use, many people especially illicit drug users, use more than one substance and were typically nested in a broader pattern of polysubstance use. Among the many possible combinations of polysubstance use, use of alcohol and other drugs combinations were the most common patterns [5,6]. However, in Southeast Asian countries, alcohol and tobacco was a common combination of polysubstance use [7].

Empirical research on various patterns of polysubstance use is important to identify the problem in the use of multiple substances. According to the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), most people with multiple substance use disorders (SUD) had at least one other co-occurring SUD. The prognosis of multiple SUD patients was worse than that of single SUD patients [8]. Furthermore, the synergistic interaction of multiple or polysubstance use has been shown to increase the possibility of negative consequences. Previous studies have pointed out that polysubstance use is associated with poisoning or overdose-related death [9-11], an increased risk of poor physical health, risky behaviour, poor response to treatment and mental health problems [12-14]. Epidemiological researches showed consistent links between polysubstance use and socio-demographic variables. Polysubstance use has been associated with young age [15], lower education [16] and socio-economic disadvantage [17]. Apart from that, some findings suggested that racial/ethnic differences in the pattern of polysubstance use [18,19].

In Malaysia, the pattern or class of polysubstance use in the adult population is still unclear. Despite having some information pertaining to polysubstance use in Malaysia, existing studies are limited to specific populations such as injection drug users [20,21], prisoners [22] and men who have sex with men (MSM) [23]. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate a nationally representative sample to provide necessary descriptive information for the development of theories explaining the pattern of polysubstance use. Moreover, the type of polysubstance use may vary in different countries. In Southeast Asia countries, kratom (the leaves from the tree Mitragyna speciosa) is one of the combined substances used by polysubstance users especially in Malaysia and Thailand. Kratom is an indigenous plant of Southeast Asia and it is reported to have similar effect on opioid and stimulants [24,25]. In Malaysia, substance users abuse kratom by mixing the kratom drink with other substances to obtain opioid-like effects or hallucinations. Singh et al (2014) reported that approximately 15% of the Malaysian population used Kratom to abstain from illicit drugs and alcohol [26].

Given the huge public health risk of substance use, understanding the pattern of polysubstance use should continue to be a priority. In this study, we used Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to identify patterns in the types of substances used (tobacco, alcohol, and other illicit substances) or latent class membership of polysubstance use. Currently, LCA is a method well used in substance use literature to explain the different patterns of substance use [27]. The purpose of this paper is to address the following research questions: (1) What are the class membership of polysubstance use and the prevalence of polysubstance use in each class membership in the general population? and (2) What kind of demographic profile can be used to predict the use of polysubstance in each class membership.

Material and method

Measures

Statistical Analysis

Results

A total of 10,472 Malaysians above 18 years participated in this survey, giving an individual response rate based on the optimum sample required to be 99.3%. The demographic characteristics of survey respondents are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 32 years (SD = 3.7) with 43% of the sample aged between 18 to 40 years. The sample was predominantly female (54.3%), Malay ethnicity (64.5%), lives in urban areas (60.9%), secondary education level (47.7%), working (56.8%), married (68.3%) and had low household income (68.2%). Table 2 presented the weighted prevalence of substance use. Regardless of polysubstance use, the highest prevalence of single substance use was tobacco users (22.4%, 95%CI: 20.86, 23.96), followed by alcohol drinkers (11.8%, 95% CI: 10.04, 13.81) and drug users (0.5%, 95% CI: 0.37, 0.79). The total prevalence of polysubstance use was 4.6% (95%CI: 3.69, 5.78) where the combination of alcohol and tobacco (4.21%, 95% CI: 3.29, 5.37) was the highest prevalence among other possible combinations of polysubstance (Table 2).

Latent class analysis

Results of model fitting for each model estimated from LCA are reported in Table 3. Based on these fit statistics, we selected a three-class solution as the best fit for the data. These three class solution presented the lowest AIC and BIC with the large improvement of likelihood ratio and chi-square Goodness of fit statistics values over the two class model. The three class solution added another class also did not appear to be meaningful and no significant improvement as the value for AIC and BIC increase after the three class solution.

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 3: Latent class model fit statistics

The estimated class population share for the three class models is displayed in Figure 1. These are the estimated proportions corresponding to the share of observations belonging to each latent class [32]. The “Predicted class memberships” (posterior probabilities) is another way of estimating the size of the latent classes. Generally, when the values for the “estimated class population shares” and “Predicted class memberships” are similar, this is an indication of good model fit. The three class solution demonstrated almost similar values of estimated and predicted class solutions. Based on posterior probabilities, class 1, class 2 and class 3 contained 2.4%, 0.3% and 97.3% of the sample respectively. Class 1 and class 2 were classified as polysubstance group as they were characterised as having probabilities of using a combination of two or more substances at one period. Figure 2 present the probabilities of the different indicators in each class. The detailed probabilities for each indicator in the LCA model were described below;

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1: Estimates class population shares

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2: Probabilities of substance use indicators in each class in the three class solution

• Class 1 was characterised by higher probabilities of tobacco and alcohol use compared to other classes, plus very low probabilities of all types of drug use. We named this class as combination of tobacco and alcohol use or “Tob+Alc use” class.

• Class 2 was the smallest sample (0.3%) but had high probabilities of smoking and kratom use with moderate to low probabilities of all types of illicit drugs, including opiods, marijuana, amphetamine/methamphetamines but no probabilities for alcohol use. This class named as “multi-drug use” class. Class 2 also demonstrated that our respondents had high probabilities of co-using of kratom with other illicit drugs.

• Class 3 contained the largest class (97.3% of the sample) characterised almost no probabilities of all types of substance except for tobacco and alcohol (low probabilities). We name this class as “non/negligible substance user” class.

The prevalence of each latent class membership by socio-demographic characteristics is presented in Table 4. Overall, majority of participants had negligible substance use or were non-substance users (class 3). The prevalence of polysubstance use according to latent class 1 (Tob+Alc) and class 2 (Multi-drug use) were 4.2% (95%CI: 3.25, 5.34) and 0.5% (95% CI: 0.31, 0.66) respectively. Young adults (age 18-40 years) demonstrated higher prevalence for both Tob+Alc used (5.1%) and multi-drug used (0.6%) compared with older adults. In terms of gender, males showed significantly higher prevalence of Tob+Alc use as compared to females. No prevalence of multi-substance use was estimated for females due to very low cases of multi-drug use among them. The combination of Tob+Alc showed high prevalence among the working group, primary education level, and non-Malay, especially Indigenous Sabah & Sarawak. However, Malays demonstrated high prevalence of multi-drug use (0.7%). The prevalence of polysubstance use for both Tob+Alc group and multi-drug group were relatively evenly similar among respondents from urban and rural areas, marital status groups and household income levels.

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 3: Factors associated with polysubstance use among Malaysian Adults from Multivariate Multinomial Logistic Regression Analysis (n=10,464)

View this table:

• View inline
• View popup
• Download powerpoint

Table 4: Distribution of socio-demographic characteristics by latent class membership

Discussion

This study presents updated epidemiology of substance use data in the adult population of Malaysia. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to identify the pattern of substance use using LCA among a nationally representative adult population in Malaysia. We identified three distinct classes of substance use among the adult population: those who primarily use a combination of tobacco and alcohol (Tob+Alc), those who use multi-drug (including soft and hard drugs) and those who were negligible or non-drug users. This three class solution from LCA was interpretability and relevant fit statistics model. Interestingly, the latent classes we identified are somewhat consistent with the findings of previous work that investigated the profile of substance use among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Malaysia which identified a three class solution as the best fitting model: “negligible substance use”, “soft substance use” and “amphetamine-type stimulant use” [23]. Similar to our findings, they also found that majority of participants were negligible drug users or non-drug users and detected a small group of sample using hard drugs or multi-drugs.

Our work extends the literature in that we added kratom as one of the indicators for LCA in addition with other common substance use. We found that there was high probability of co-use of kratom with other multiple substance use (refer to class 2 latent class as visually represented in Figure 1 and Figure 2). This finding was supported by previous studies in Malaysia showed that substance users in Malaysia used kratom to abstain from illicit drugs and to manage stimulant withdrawal symptoms [25,26,34]. A study on kratom consumption in the northern areas of peninsular Malaysia also reported that they used kratom to reduce their intake of more expensive opiates like heroin [25]. Although kratom has perceived therapeutic effects, several studies suggested abuse and addiction potential, synergistic toxic effects and fatal interactions with other psychoactive drugs [35,36]. Furthermore, there has been no report on the fatalities in Southeast Asia caused by the ingestion of pure kratom alone. Although the enforcement of kratom related offences in Malaysia is under the jurisdiction of the Poisons Act 1952 [37], the issue of misuse and offences must be addressed by all parties including law, policymakers and the community to improve the enforcement work done by the authorities.

In our Multinomial regression results, we chose Class 3 (non/negligible substance use) as the reference category to distinguish the pattern of polysubstance use from predominantly negligible or non-users. As reported in numerous literature, gender (male) is an important demographic characteristic associated with polysubstance use [16,19,38]. This study detected a significant association of the male gender with the Tob+Alc group but not for the multi-drug group. This may be due to a very low prevalence of multi-drug use among female respondents. In terms of age differences, the young adults (18 – 40 years) demonstrated higher prevalence and risk of being a member of polysubstance use than older adults (≥60 years), for both Tob+Alc and multi-substance classes. Our findings are in line with the study from The United States that reported the co-use of tobacco and alcohol were highest among young adults and declined with increasing age [39]. As well as for other polysubstance the risk of use, abuse/dependence and use of other forms of illicit drugs after the use of marijuana/cannabis declined with increasing age [15]. Another LCA study among the Great Britain population also reported that being young was associated with an increased likelihood of membership of the polydrug use class’s wide range and moderate range [38]. There are several explanations of this trend for polysubstance use to decline with increasing age. This includes socio maturity where increasing age will increase the social maturity on the individual’s ability to resist other illicit drug use [40]. Other explanations might be due to a recruited effect or age of onset of first drug use such as marijuana, those who take up marijuana later would be less predisposed to other illicit drug use than those who take it up early.

Our findings of polysubstance use varying among racial/ethnic groups are consistent with the results from other studies [16,19,39,41]. For example, a study in the United States found that Whites were more likely to drink while Natives American/Alaskan Natives were most likely to smoke and co-use alcohol and tobacco [39]. Our results showed that the co-use of alcohol and tobacco were more likely to occur among Indigenous Sabah & Sarawak, followed by Indian and Chinese ethnicity as compared to Malay ethnicity. However, according to the LCA model, the Malays ethnicity demonstrated the highest prevalence of multi-substance use (which had low probabilities of taking alcohol) compared to other ethnic groups. Our study was in line with the findings noted in another epidemiological study in Malaysia reporting similar results, although that study involved adolescents [42]. These findings suggest that the culture and practices of respective ethnic groups might play an important role in predicting substance use. In Malaysia, Malay adults had low prevalence of alcohol use but high prevalence of tobacco use, while Indigenous Sabah & Sarawak showed high prevalence for both alcohol and tobacco consumption [2,43]. In this country, Muslims (the majority are of the Malay ethnicity) are forbidden from consuming alcohol, and it is also illegal to sell any alcoholic beverages to them. In contrast, drinking alcohol is a culture and social obligation among other ethnic groups.For example, indigenous Sabah & Sarawak consume alcohol during their festivals and social gatherings [44].

The present findings also suggested that adults with low education levels (no formal education, primary education and secondary education) were more likely to use polysubstance of Tob+Alc group compared to higher education levels (tertiary education). However, no significant association was found between education levels and polysubstance of multi-substance group. Our findings is consistent with the latent class analysis of polysubstance from European studies which reported higher education was associated with a reduced risk of moderate but not high polysubstance class [16,38]. They found that there was a reduced risk of moderate polysubstance group membership for participants with an education level beyond secondary education (General Certificate of Secondary Education, GCSE).

Our study also revealed that working adults is a significant predictor for polysubstance use in the Tob+Alc class. This is consistent with the epidemiological data in Malaysia, which reported that the prevalence of current smokers and drinkers were higher among working groups, especially self-employed and private employees compared to those not working [2,43]. Working conditions may influence addictive behaviours such as exposure to psychological job strain (due to high work demands and low coping skills) that may lead to an increased risk of substance use especially alcohol and tobacco [45-47]. The misuse of alcohol by workers represents an important social policy issue because it has the potential to influence the employee’s job performance. For instance, even moderate daily alcohol consumption can lead to absenteeism and smoke breaks among employees that can be considered disruptive as it takes time away from work.

Taken together, the results from the current study suggest that prevention and treatment strategies for polysubstance use especially for the co-use of alcohol and tobacco should place a special emphasis on young adults and other high-risk groups such as people from the Indigenous Sabah & Sarawak ethnicity and those who are working. Whilst, the prevention strategies for polysubstance use of multi-drugs including illicit drugs, should focus on young adults and people from the Malay ethnicity. In addition, kratom use should not be reasonably expected to be safe, especially for co-use with other drugs, and it poses a public health threat. Thus, stronger measures to control of this drug are warranted and the use of kratom in Malaysia should be further investigated, including the effects of co-use with other drugs.

This study needs to be interpreted with caution in light of several limitations. The primary limitation of this study is the relatively low prevalence rate of multi-drug uses such as opioids, marijuana and amphethamine type stimulants (ATS). Due to the small number of cases of illicit drug use, our study may have been underpowered to identify additional classes and differentiate the pattern of polysubstance classes between hard drugs and soft drugs in the multiple-drug group (class 2) and other potential variables associated with multi-drug use. Our study also used self-reported substance use where the prevalence rates could be misrepresented. However, past researchers suggested suitable reliability and validity of studies with self-reported substance use [48,49]. The limitation of this study was the sample recruited from a cross-sectional design of a population-based survey, and it only investigated the socio-demographic predictor factors related to polysubstance use. Although other studies [50-52] have found the association between polysubstance use and psychological distress, as our study extracted the data from a large population-based survey which is almost similar to other existing population-based studies mainly cross-sectional, we have no capacity to consider prospectively early life predictors and to describe the association with psychological disorder. Future studies should replicate and extend these findings with a larger sample using a cohort design and to measure the association of polysubstance use with other early life predictors and mental health disorders.

Conclusion

In summary, the current study provides an illustration pattern of polysubstance use in Malaysia with a three class solution (Tob+Alc, Multi-drug and non/negligible user). The LCA model also demonstrated a high probability of co-use of kratom together with other illicit drugs in the multi-drug classes. Our study emphasises the importance of considering patterns of polysubstance use when addressing demographic risk factors. As noted in our regression model, there was an increased risk of being a multi-drug user among the younger age group. While the model for Tob+Alc class demonstrated a strong link with males, young adults, non-Malay ethnicity, working groups and low education level.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.