ABSTRACT
Introduction Patients undergoing orthopedic surgery usually suffer considerably from peri-operative pain and intrathecal morphine (ITM) has recently been used as an effective analgesic method. The intrathecal morphine dose achieving optimal analgesia for orthopedic surgery while minimizing side effects has not yet been determined. There is currently a lack of literature synthesis on the safety and effects of low-dose ITM on orthopedic surgery.
Methods and analysis A thorough literature search will be performed on multiple electronic databases and trial registries until January 11th 2022, and reference lists will be examined. Two independent reviewers will select studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias and quality of the included studies. We will select randomized controlled trials comparing low-dose ITM (<100μg) with high-dose ITM (<200μg) or placebo treatment or other comparatives. We will assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Jadad score will be applied to assess the quality of each included trial. We will also use Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to determine the confidence in effect estimates. Publication bias will be evaluated by visually inspecting funnel plots and Egger regression asymmetry test in estimations of more than 10 trials. Standard meta-analysis will be performed using R package meta.
Ethics and dissemination The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal and related conferences. The data used in this meta-analysis will not contain individual patient data and ethical approval is therefore not required.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study is granted by Interdisciplinary clinical research project of Peking University First Hospital (Grant number: 2021CR31).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ckni.net, ClinialTrials.gov
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
