ABSTRACT
Background Mean active degree is an important proxy measure of cross-sectional network connectivity commonly used in HIV/STI epidemiology research. No current studies have compared measurement methods of mean degree using cross-sectional surveys for men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States.
Methods We compared mean degree estimates based on reported ongoing main and casual sexual partnerships (current method) against dates of first and last sex (retrospective method) from 0–12 months prior to survey date in ARTnet, a cross-sectional survey of MSM in the U.S. (2017–2019). ARTnet collected data on the number of sexual partners in the past year but limited reporting on details used for calculating mean degree to the 5 most recent partners. We used linear regression to understand the impact of truncated partnership data on mean degree estimation.
Results Retrospective method mean degree systematically decreased as the month at which it was calculated increased from 0–12 months prior to survey date. Among participants with >5 partners in the past year compared to those with ≤5, the average change in main degree between 12 and 0 months prior to survey date was −0.05 (95% CI: −0.08, −0.03) after adjusting for race/ethnicity, age, and education. The adjusted average change in casual degree was −0.40 (95% CI: −0.45, −0.35).
Conclusions The retrospective method underestimates mean degree for MSM in surveys with truncated partnership data, especially for casual partnerships. The current method is less prone to bias from partner truncation when the target population experiences higher cumulative partners per year.
Summary Survey designs can lead to potential bias, such as underestimation, in the measurement of mean active degree in sexual networks of men who have sex with men.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R21 MH112449 and R01 AI138783, and a grant from the MAC AIDS Fund.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Emory University Institutional Review Board gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R21 MH112449 and R01 AI138783, and a grant from the MAC AIDS Fund.
Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, The University of Edinburgh, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos