ABSTRACT
Background Mean active degree is an important proxy measure of network connectivity in HIV/STI epidemiology. The performance of different degree estimands are not known for men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States, especially within the context of fixed choice designs in behavioral surveys.
Methods We compared estimates of mean active degree based on reported ongoing main and casual partnerships (current method) against dates of first and last sex (retrospective method) in ARTnet, a cross-sectional survey of U.S. MSM with partnership reporting limited to the 5 most recent partners. We used linear regression to understand the impact of this data truncation on differences between the current and retrospective methods.
Results Retrospective estimates declined as the offset was shifted backwards in time. Among participants with more than 5 total past-year partners compared to those with 5 or fewer partners, the average change in main degree between 12- and 0-month offsets was -0.05 (95% CI: -0.08, -0.03) after adjusting for demographics. The adjusted average change in casual degree was -0.40 (95% CI: -0.45, -0.35).
Conclusions The retrospective method underestimates mean degree in surveys that limit partner reporting, especially for offsets further from the survey date and for casual partnerships.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R21 MH112449 and R01 AI138783, and a grant from the MAC AIDS Fund.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Emory University Institutional Review Board gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants R21 MH112449 and R01 AI138783, and a grant from the MAC AIDS Fund.
Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
