Abstract
In the present study, we were interested in the decline over time of anti SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell responses after two doses of mRNA vaccines in total and by age group and comorbidity. The second goal was to suggest an immunological correlate for protection on an individual basis and to describe the probability of protection over time after second vaccination.
We analysed blood samples from 228 residents (median age 83.8 years) and from 273 Health Care Workers (HCW; median age 49.7 years) of five nursing homes and one home for the elderly with assisted living support. Participants had received two vaccinations. The blood samples were analysed for SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody and T-cell responses. We compared outcomes in the HCW and residents in the respective institutions. No breakthrough infections occurred during the study period. The initial immune responses in the younger participants were about 30 % higher than in the older ones. Over time, all parameters dropped continuously in all groups within the maximum observation period of 232 days. Comorbidities such as coronary heart disease or diabetes mellitus reduced the initial immune responses, regardless of age. In contrast to an almost linear decline in antibody levels, we observed that the interferon-gamma response remained at a constant level between about day 120 and 180, only to decline further thereafter.
Based on our data, we propose on an individual level a correlate of protection: Persons who have a neutralizing capacity of 75 % (which would correspond to approx. 200 BAU/ml) and an interferon-gamma response above 200 mIU/ml should be considered to be protected resp. sufficiently immunized.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The study was financed by the City of Luebeck, University Luebeck, Vorwerker Diakonie, Euroimmun AG, and Klinisch-Immunologisches Labor Stoecker.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice and approved by the ethics committee of the University of Luebeck (21-353).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Abbreviations
- COVID-19
- coronavirus disease 19
- ELISA
- enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- IgG/A
- immunoglobulin G/A
- rtPCR
- real-time polymerase chain reaction
- SARS-CoV-2
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos