Physical behaviours and their association with type 2 diabetes risk in urban South African middle-aged adults: An isotemporal substitution approach

Clement N. Kufe, Julia H. Goedecke, Maphoko Masemola, Tinashe Chikowore, Melikhaya Soboyisi, Antonia Smith, Kate Westgate, Soren Brage, Lisa K. Micklesfield
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.08.22270616

Abstract

Introduction To examine the associations between physical behaviours and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk in middle-aged South African men and women.

Research design and methods This cross-sectional study included middle-aged men (n=403; age: median [IQR], 53.0 [47.8–58.8] years) and women (n=324; 53.4 [49.1–58.1] years) from Soweto, South Africa. Total movement volume (average movement in milli-g) and time (minutes/day) spent in different physical behaviours, including awake sitting/lying, standing, light intensity physical activity (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA), were determined by combining the signals from two triaxial accelerometers worn simultaneously on the hip and thigh. All participants completed an oral glucose tolerance test, from which indicators of diabetes risk were derived. Associations between physical behaviours and T2DM risk were adjusted for sociodemographic factors and body composition.

Results Total movement volume was inversely associated with measures of fasting and 2-h glucose and directly associated with insulin sensitivity, basal insulin clearance, beta-cell function, but these associations were not independent of fat mass, except for basal insulin clearance in women. In men, replacing 30 minutes of sitting/lying, standing or LPA with the same amount of MVPA time was associated with 1.2–1.4 mmol/L lower fasting glucose and 12.3–13.4 mgl2/mUmin higher insulin sensitivity. In women, substituting sitting/lying with the same amount of standing time or LPA was associated with 0.5–0.8 mmol/L lower fasting glucose. Substituting 30 minutes sitting/lying with the same amount of standing time was also associated with 3.2 mgl2/mUmin higher insulin sensitivity, and substituting 30 minutes of sitting/lying, standing or LPA with the same amount of MVPA time was associated with 0.25-0.29 ng/mIU higher basal insulin clearance in women.

Conclusion MVPA is important in reducing T2DM risk in men and women but LPA appears to be important in women only. Recommendations for PA may differ by sex.

Introduction

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing globally and sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is projected to have the greatest estimated increase compared to all other regions by 2045 (1). Within SSA, South Africa (SA) has the highest prevalence of T2DM, with the latest national prevalence for adult men and women at 8% and 13%, respectively (2). Extensive evidence reports an inverse association between physical activity (PA) and T2DM risk (3–5). Studies have shown that physical activity of any intensity positively influences glucose regulation and insulin sensitivity in a dose–response manner (6,7).

Sedentary time is also recognised as a risk factor for T2DM with a systematic review and meta-analysis showing that participants who reported the greatest sedentary time were at a 112% higher relative risk (RR) of T2DM compared to those with the lowest sedentary time (8). While some studies have shown this association to be independent of physical activity (9), a meta-analysis by Patterson et al., showed an increased risk for T2DM with higher levels of total sitting independent of PA (10).

Time spent in sedentary behaviour, PA and sleep are mutually exclusive and the total minutes available in a day are fixed and finite. Therefore, understanding the beneficial effects of physical activity depend not only on the considered aspect of PA but also on the activity type displaced (11). A recent meta-analysis reported that replacing 30 minutes of sedentary time with the same amount of time in light intensity physical activity (LPA) was associated with reductions in fasting insulin, waist circumference and all-cause mortality, and replacing sedentary time with moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) was associated with reductions in body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, fasting glucose and insulin concentrations, and all-cause mortality (12). Further, results from the UK Biobank study (n= 475,502) reported that replacing sedentary behaviour with 30 minutes/day of physical activities or structured exercise was associated with a 6–31% lower incidence of T2DM 11 years later (13). Isotemporal substitution analysis simultaneously models a specific activity and the effects of time in substitution of the activity by another for the same amount of time (14).

A South African population-based survey reported that only 14.8% were moderately physically active and 27.8% were vigorously physically active, and that men were more likely to be physically active whereby women were less likely to engage in moderate as well as vigorous PA (15). Few South African studies have explored the association between physical behaviours and T2DM risk (16–21). Globally, the majority of evidence reporting the association between PA and health outcomes is based on self-reported PA which has several limitations (22). Wearable devices are increasingly being used and provide a more accurate, objective assessment of sedentary behaviour and PA intensity and volume than subjective self-reported measures (23,24). Edwardson et al., have shown that high accuracy can be obtained using two wearable devices with postural categorization from an accelerometer on the thigh, and intensity also using information from an accelerometer on the waist (25).

There is controversy as to whether the association between PA and T2DM risk is mediated or independent of adiposity (4). This is relevant to the South African context where there is a high prevalence of obesity and where adiposity differs significantly between men and women (2).

The aim of this study is therefore to examine the association between physical behaviours quantified by combining signals from two accelerometers, and risk for T2DM in middle-aged men and women from urban South Africa.

Materials and methods

Research design, setting and participants

This cross–sectional study used data from the Middle-aged Soweto Cohort (MASC) collected between January 2017 and August 2018 (502 men and 527 women), as described previously (26). For this analysis, complete accelerometry (27) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) data were available on 727 participants (n=403 men and n=324 women) (Figure 1).

Figure 1:
Figure 1: Sample selection flow chart

Ethical approval was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) Medical (M160604 and M160975) of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. All study procedures and possible risks were explained to participants who consented and signed the informed consent form prior to inclusion in the study. Data collection took place in accordance with the guidelines of Helsinki at the South African Medical Research Council/University of the Witwatersrand Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital in Soweto, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Procedures

Physical behaviour assessment and data processing

Physical behaviours were objectively measured using two accelerometers, an ActiGraph GT3X+ (AG) (ActiGraph, Pensacola, USA) on the right hip, and an activPAL (AP) (PAL technologies Ltd., Glasgow, UK) on the right thigh. The participants were advised to wear the accelerometers continuously for seven days and nights including sleep times and the weekend, and only to remove the ActiGraph GT3X+ during bathing or water-based activities. They were also requested to continue with their normal daily activities. Participants received a sleep diary and were asked to record their daily sleep and wake times for the same period.

At the end of the seven days, participants returned the accelerometers and raw data was downloaded using the Actilife software (ActiGraph, Pensacola, USA) and actiPAL software (PAL Technologies Ltd., Glasgow, UK). Complete data from ActiGraph GT3X+ and activPAL for four to seven days was obtained by a combination of processing scripts (PAMPRO) and post-processing scripts (28). The raw tri-axial signals from the two accelerometers were calibrated to local gravity (29) and acceleration and pitch angles converted to minute-by-minute time series. The signals were combined with the self-reported sleep times and reported at participant level to estimate total volume and time spent in postures and intensities of behaviours. The behaviour outcomes were summarised as total movement volume (Euclidian norm minus one, ENMO expressed as milli-g (mg)), time spent in sleep, and awake time in sitting/lying, standing, LPA, and MVPA, all in minutes per day (min/day). Details of the objectively measured PA data acquisition, processing, development of the algorithm and classification are described elsewhere (27).

Measures of type 2 diabetes risk

From each participant, blood samples were drawn after an overnight fast for determination of plasma glucose, serum insulin, C–peptide, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Participants then underwent a standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Participants ingested 75g anhydrous glucose in 250ml water and then 5ml blood samples were drawn every 30 minutes for 2 hours. Randox RX Daytona Chemistry Analyser (Randox Laboratories Ltd., London, UK) was used to measure plasma glucose concentrations and D–10™ Haemoglobin Analyser (Bio–Rad Laboratories, Inc. USA) was used to measure HbA1c concentrations. Immulite® 1000 Immunoassay System (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY) was used to measure serum insulin and C-peptide concentrations.

The homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) was used to estimate fasting insulin resistance (30). Insulin sensitivity was estimated by the Matsuda Index for participants with complete OGTT results, and the composite insulin sensitivity index for those with data at 0 and 120 minutes (31,32). Insulin secretion was calculated as the C-peptide index, which was the ratio of the increment in C-peptide to glucose during the first 30 minutes of the OGTT. The oral disposition index (oDI), an estimate of beta-cell function, was calculated as a product of C-peptide index and Matsuda index (33). Basal insulin clearance were estimated as fasting C-peptide/insulin concentrations, and postprandial insulin clearance was estimated from the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) of C-peptide to iAUC insulin using the trapezoidal method.

Questionnaires were completed on Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) (34) and included data on age, marital status (married/unmarried), highest level of education attained (no formal schooling/elementary school, secondary school, and tertiary education), 12 item household assets classified into 3 categories (0-4 for category 1, 5-8 for category 2 and 9-12 for category 3) and employment status (employed/not employed).

Anthropometry and body composition

Weight was measured with a TANITA digital scale (model: TBF-410, TANITA Corporation, US) to the nearest 0.1 kg. Height was measured with a wall-mounted stadiometer (Holtain, UK) to the nearest 0.1 cm. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/(height in m)2. Sub-total fat mass (FM, kg) (total fat mass minus the head) was measured with a Hologic QDR 4500A dual–energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machine (Hologic Inc., Bedford, USA) and analysed with APEX software version 13.4.2.3 according to standard procedures. Fat mass index (FMI) was calculated as sub-total fat mass (kg)/height2 (m2). Abdominal visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) areas were estimated from DXA, as described elsewhere (35).

HIV/AIDS tests

Pre- and post-HIV counselling was provided and an HIV antibody test, Wondfo® One Step HIV–1/2 Whole Blood/Serum/Plasma: Test 2 lines (Guanghu Wondfo Biotech Co., Ltd) was completed for all consented participants, except those previously known as HIV positive. Newly diagnosed HIV positive participants were referred to an HIV clinic for follow up and retained in the study. Participants were subsequently categorised into HIV negative (HIV-) or HIV positive (HIV+).

Statistical analysis

Data was analysed using Stata 15.1/IC (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Shapiro-Wilk test and Q-Q probability plots were used to assess distribution and ascertain skewness and kurtosis of the data. Variables were summarised as count (percentages) for categorical data, mean (standard deviation) if normally distributed continuous data, and median (25th–75th percentiles) if not normally distributed continuous data. Student’s t-tests were used to explore the sex differences for normally distributed continuous data, and Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare skewed continuous data. Multivariable robust regression analyses were used to explore the relationship between total movement volume and outcome variables (fasting and 2-hr glucose, insulin sensitivity, basal insulin clearance, and beta-cell function). In model 1, age was included as a covariate, in model 2; age, HIV status, education, asset category and employment were included as covariates; in model 3, FMI was added to covariates in model 2; while in model 4, VAT was included with the covariates from model 3.

Isotemporal substitution modelling was used to estimate the effect of replacing time spent in one physical behaviour (sleep, sitting/lying, standing, LPA and MVPA) with another; specifically we ascertained the theoretical effect of reallocating 30 minutes of one physical behaviour to 30 minutes of another physical behaviour on the glucose and insulin measures listed above. Regression coefficients (and 95%CI) represent the replacement of one physical behaviour with another, while other behaviours remain constant for the same time. Isotemporal substitution models were adjusted for age, HIV status, education, asset category and employment (model 2 in total movement volume robust regression analyses). Due to marked differences in levels of PA and adiposity between men and women (Table 1), all analyses were stratified by sex. A p–value of <0.05 was considered significant and 95% CI stated.

View this table:
Table 1: Body fat distribution and physical behaviours in men and women

Results

Sample characteristics

Physical behaviours, body fat, and measures of glycaemia and insulin dynamics for the whole sample, and men and women separately, are presented in Table 1. Men and women were of similar age (∼53 years) and a similar proportion were living with HIV (21.1% vs. 19.8%, p=0.657). Women had higher BMI and DXA-derived measures of fat mass, FMI, VAT and SAT than men (all p<0.001).

There were no sex differences in LPA or sleep time, but men had higher total movement volume (mg) and spent more time in MVPA than women (both p<0.001). Men spent more time sitting/lying and less time standing than women (both p<0.001). There were no sex differences in fasting or 2-hour glucose, while all the measures of insulin dynamics were different between the sexes, with women having higher HOMA-IR, insulin secretion and beta-cell function, and lower insulin sensitivity and basal insulin clearance than men.

Associations between total movement volume and measures of glycaemia and insulin dynamics

In men and women, total movement volume was inversely associated with fasting glucose and positively associated with insulin sensitivity in models adjusted for age, HIV status and SES (Table 2). After adjusting for FMI and VAT these associations were no longer significant. In men only, total movement volume was also inversely associated with 2-h glucose, but after adjusting for FMI and VAT this association was no longer significant. In women only, total movement volume was also significantly associated with basal insulin clearance, and this remained significant when adjusting for FMI and VAT. There was no association between total movement volume and beta-cell function in either men or women.

View this table:
Table 2: Multiple robust regression analyses of total movement volume and measures of glycaemic and insulin dynamics

Isotemporal substitution of physical behaviours in men

Replacing 30 minutes of sitting/lying, standing or LPA with 30 minutes of MVPA was associated with 1.2–1.4 mmol/L lower fasting glucose and 12.3–13.4 mgl2/mUmin higher insulin sensitivity in men (Table 3 and 4). Replacing 30 minutes of sitting/lying with the same amount of time standing or in MVPA was associated with 1.4 mmol/L and 3.3 mmol/L lower 2-hour glucose, respectively. Although replacing 30 minutes of LPA with the same amount of time in MVPA was associated with 3.5 mmol/L lower 2-hour glucose, it was also associated with 1.6 mmol/L lower 2-hour glucose when replaced by standing. Replacing 30 minutes of sitting/lying and LPA with the same amount of time in MVPA was associated with 17 mIU/mmol and 19.1 mIU/mmol higher beta-cell function, respectively. Replacing physical behaviours was not associated with basal insulin clearance in men.

View this table:
Table 3: Associations of reallocating 30 minutes of physical behaviours on glycaemia for men and women
View this table:
Table 4: Associations of reallocating 30 minutes of physical behaviours on insulin dynamics for men and women

After adjusting for FMI, the associations between physical behaviours and fasting glucose, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function were no longer significant (data not shown). However, replacing 30 minutes of sitting/lying with 30 minutes of standing time (1.3 mmol/L, CI: 0.4–2.2, p=0.003) and replacing 30 minutes of standing with the same amount of LPA time (1.7 mmol/L, CI: 0.4–3.0, p=0.007) both remained significantly associated with 2-hour glucose after adjusting for FMI.

Isotemporal substitution of physical behaviours in women

Replacing 30 minutes of sitting/lying with standing or LPA were associated with 0.5 mmol/L and 0.8 mmol/L lower fasting glucose, respectively, but were not associated with 2-hour glucose. Replacing 30 minutes of sitting/lying with the same amount of time standing was associated with 3.2 mgl2/mUmin higher insulin sensitivity, 0.05 ng/mIU higher basal insulin clearance, and 11.3 mIU/mmol higher beta-cell function. Replacing 30 minutes of sitting/lying or standing or LPA with the same amount of time in MVPA was associated with 0.25–0.30 ng/mIU higher basal insulin clearance.

After further adjusting for FMI, the associations with fasting glucose, 2-hour glucose, and insulin sensitivity were no longer significant. In contrast, the significant associations with basal insulin clearance were maintained when 30 minutes of sitting/lying (0.21 ng/mIU, CI: 0.41–0.02, p=0.029) or standing (0.19 ng/mIU, CI: 0.39–0.002, p=0.048) were replaced by MVPA. Replacing 30 minutes of sitting/lying with the same amount of standing was also still associated with higher beta-cell function (8.68 mIU/mmol, CI: 0.93–16.44, p=0.028) after adjusting for FMI.

Discussion

This study in a middle-aged African population of men and women showed that physical activity was associated with lower risk for T2DM. Substituting 30 minutes of awake sitting/lying, standing or LPA with the same amount of time in MVPA in men, was associated with lower fasting glucose and higher insulin sensitivity, both well-accepted indicators of T2DM risk. In women just replacing 30 minutes of sitting/lying with the same amount of time standing was associated with lower fasting glucose and higher insulin sensitivity. We have also shown that the associations between physical behaviours and these measures of T2DM risk are mediated by adiposity in both men and women.

In both men and women our study showed that total movement volume was associated with lower fasting glucose and higher insulin sensitivity, and in men only was also associated with lower 2-hr glucose, although none of these associations remained significant after adjusting for adiposity. Physical activity through its effects on multiple organs and systems is associated with improved insulin sensitivity and glycaemia (5,36). Data from the EPIC-InterAct case-control study of incident T2DM reported a significant reduction in the risk of developing T2DM in men and women who had higher levels of physical activity (37). Indeed, epidemiological studies have shown that PA reduces the risk of insulin resistance and T2DM in healthy individuals and appropriate exercise training is an effective intervention for individuals at risk of T2DM (38,39). Physical activity can reduce the risk of T2DM in men and women with high body mass index and elevated glucose levels. Even relatively modest exercise can stimulate immediate and persistent insulin sensitivity the next day in adults at risk of T2DM (40). The men in our study completed on average 410 minutes of MVPA/week while average MVPA/week in the women was 240 minutes, which may account for the additional effect of PA on postprandial glucose uptake, with skeletal muscle being the major site of uptake. Extensive literature has explored the association between objectively measured physical activity and measures of T2DM risk (4,8,9). Not all of these studies have accounted for adiposity, while others have found the association to be mediated by adiposity (36), and still other studies have found the significant association between PA and T2DM remains after adjusting for adiposity (37,41). The differences in the results may be due to marked heterogeneity in research designs and assessment of physical behaviours and T2DM risk. In our study, the associations between PA and T2DM risk in both men and women were mediated by total adiposity. Balkau et al. reported that objectively measured daily total activity and the association with insulin sensitivity in healthy adult men and women between 30–60 years remains even after adjusting for overall body mass index or abdominal adiposity (42).

Using the combination of signals from two accelerometers for objective measurement of physical behaviours, we used isotemporal substitution to account for the displacement of time in particular behaviours within a 24-hr day (11,14). We showed that replacing sitting/lying with standing time was only associated with lower 2-hour glucose in the men, while in women, replacing sitting with the same amount of time standing was associated with improvements in fasting glucose, insulin sensitivity, insulin clearance and beta-cell function. This difference when modelling the hypothetical effect of posture change resulting in all aspects of insulin dynamics being affected in women compared to only post-prandial glucose in men may be due to the higher adiposity in women. An Australian study in men and women (36-80 years) using the isotemporal substitution approach, showed that replacing sitting with standing for 2 h/day was associated with 2% lowering of fasting plasma glucose in both men and women (43). These differences may be accounted for by the vast disparities in adiposity between men and women in our study compared to the study in Australia.

Replacing sedentary time i.e. sitting or standing with movement, irrespective of intensity, has been associated with a wide array of health benefits. Yates et al., reported that reallocating 30 minutes per day of sedentary time to LPA and MVPA was associated with a 5% and 18% difference in insulin sensitivity (Matsuda-ISI) in adult men and women of average age 65 years after adjusting for ethnicity, sex, age, medication, social deprivation and BMI (44). In a South African study, LPA has been shown to be associated with reduced cardiovascular disease risk (45) and has also been included in the recent WHO recommendations for physical activity. Interestingly in this study, the only significant associations when replacing sedentary behaviour with LPA was a decrease in fasting glucose in the women only when replacing sitting with LPA, and an increase in 2-hour glucose in the men when replacing standing with LPA. The men and women in this study spent an average of 2 hours a day in LPA, and previous studies in similar populations has shown that this is largely time spent in incidental activity or walking for transport rather than leisure time activity which is typically low in populations from low and middle income countries (18,46). As physical behaviours have been accurately measured in this study by combining the signals from two accelerometers, it can be concluded time spent in LPA in this population is not sufficient to influence diabetes risk significantly.

Time spent in higher intensity physical activity, in many studies described as MVPA, has been repeatedly shown in the literature to be associated with lower T2DM risk (3,6,47). In this study replacing sitting/lying, standing and LPA with MVPA was associated with improvements in the measures of T2DM risk in men including a decrease in fasting glucose and 2-h glucose, and an increase in insulin sensitivity and beta cell function. In contrast in the women, replacing sitting/lying, standing and LPA with MVPA was only associated with an increase in basal insulin clearance. Although we did not specifically examine time spent in vigorous intensity physical activity, previous research has shown that SA men spend more time in higher intensity activity than women (48), which may have explained the greater associations between MVPA and diabetes risk in men than women. Another explanation may be the ‘legacy effect’ of earlier patterns of activity which have been shown to be higher in men compared to women throughout adolescence in a longitudinal South African cohort (46), and which may then result in alterations in muscle physiology and improved cardiorespiratory fitness that may be maintained into adulthood. This is consistent with the higher levels of cardiorespiratory fitness in young adult men compared to women from Soweto (48), and another study from Cape Town that reported very low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness in young women (45). Indeed, cardiorespiratory fitness, and not objectively measured MVPA, has previously been associated with higher insulin sensitivity in black African women (45). Results from an exercise intervention study in black African women with obesity and low baseline levels of cardiorespiratory fitness demonstrated that 12 weeks of intensive training only resulted in a small improvement in insulin sensitivity with no changes in glycaemia (49). This may be explained by low levels of fitness and high levels of obesity and insulin resistance in these women (45).

Another novel finding of the study was the improvement in insulin clearance when replacing sitting/lying, standing, and LPA, with MVPA, in women only. Previous research has shown that black South African women have low insulin clearance compared to their European counterparts, which contributes to their characteristic hyperinsulinemia (50). Further we showed that women had lower insulin clearance compared to men. It is still unclear if low insulin clearance and/or the resultant hyperinsulinemia is a compensatory response to low insulin sensitivity or is the driver of T2D in the Black African women (50). Nonetheless, this is the first study to show that MVPA is associated with higher insulin clearance, independent of the effects of adiposity, and that this association is specific to women and not observed in men. Prospective studies are required to investigate whether an increase in insulin clearance, and consequently a reduction in hyperinsulinemia, does confer reduced risk from T2D in black Africans.

The strengths of this study included the combination of signals from two accelerometers for objective measurement of physical behaviours. Most studies have used regression analysis to determine the associations between PA and diabetes risk. Our study used isotemporal substitution and 30 minutes as this links closely with public health recommendations. These results highlight the importance of measuring different physical activity behaviours, which are differentially associated with glycaemia and insulin dynamics. Notably, we included both men and women and showed differences in the relationship between physical activity behaviours and diabetes risk. The cross-sectional design is a limitation of the study. Self-reported sleep diaries are prone to recall bias, and social desirability coupled with reporting of time in bed, rather than sleep duration, may introduce misclassification. However, the accelerometry adjunct to sleep diaries assisted in verifying the sleep classification.

In conclusion, this study provides novel evidence on the potential benefits of engaging in more active behaviours on risk factors for T2DM in men and women. This is critical in public health given the high amount of time spent sitting/lying and standing in our study population. Further intervention research is required to determine whether the effects of different intensity physical behaviours are sex-specific and need to be taken into account when designing public health interventions to reduce non-communicable disease risk.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Funding sources

The study received funding from the South African Medical Research Council, with funds received from the South African National Department of Health, the Research Councils UK Newton Fund to the University of Cambridge, GSK (Grant no: ES/N013891/1) and the South African National Research Foundation (Grant no: UID:98561) to the University of Witwatersrand. The work of KW, AS and SB were supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (IS-BRC-1215-20014) and the Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/3, MC_UU_00006/4). TC is the recipient of a Wellcome Trust International Training Fellow grant (214205/Z/18/Z).

Author contributions

NCK analysed the data. AS and KW processed the physical activity. NCK, JHG, SB and LKM conceived the study and NCK drafted and revised the manuscript under the supervision of JHG, SB and LKM. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

None declared

SUPPLEMENTARY FILES

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the participants as well as the following DPHRU staff for their input during data collection and entry: Tshifiwa Ratshikombo, Vukosi Mkansi, Sphume Thango, Mosadiapula Nakedi, Thabile Sibiya, Bonisiwe. Mlambo, Caroline Makura, Dr Mamosilo Lichaba, and Karabo Pearl Nkhahle and team.

Footnotes

  • Email addresses:

  • CNK: klekufe{at}gmail.com

  • JHG: julia.goedecke{at}mrc.ac.za

  • MM: maphokomasemola{at}gmail.com

  • TC: tinashedoc{at}gmail.com

  • MS: melikhaya.soboyisi{at}gmail.com

  • AS: antonia.smith{at}mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk

  • KW: kate.westgate{at}mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk

  • SB: soren.brage{at}mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk

  • LKM: lisa.micklesfield{at}wits.ac.za

References

  1. 1.↵
    IDF. Diabetes Atlas, 10th Edition 2021. Brussels; 2021.
  2. 2.↵
    NDoH, Stats SA S & I. South Africa Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Pretoria; 2019.
  3. 3.↵
    Smith AD, Crippa A, Woodcock J, Brage S. Physical activity and incident type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Diabetologia. 2016;59(12):2527–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Aune D, Norat T, Leitzmann M, Tonstad S, Vatten LJ. Physical activity and the risk of type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30(7):529–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Lavie CJ, Johannsen N, Swift D, Sénéchal M, Earnest C, Church T, et al. Exercise is medicine - the importance of physical activity, exercise training, cardiorespiratory fitness and obesity in the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. Eur Endocrinol. 2014;10(1):18–22.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Jelleyman C, Edwardson CL, Henson J, Gray LJ, Rowlands A V., Khunti K, et al. Associations of Physical Activity Intensities with Markers of Insulin Sensitivity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(12):2451–8.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Bird SR, Hawley JA. Update on the effects of physical activity on insulin sensitivity in humans. Vol. 2, BMJ Open Sport and Exercise Medicine. 2017. p. 1–26.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA, Davies MJ, Gorely T, Gray LJ, et al. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012;55(11):2895–905.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, Bajaj RR, Silver MA, Mitchell MS, et al. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 162, Annals of Internal Medicine. 2015. p. 123–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Patterson R, McNamara E, Tainio M, de Sá TH, Smith AD, Sharp SJ, et al. Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(9):811–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Mekary RA, Willett WC, Hu FB, Ding EL. Isotemporal substitution paradigm for physical activity epidemiology and weight change. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(4):519–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    del Pozo-Cruz J, García-Hermoso A, Alfonso-Rosa RM, Alvarez-Barbosa F, Owen N, Chastin S, et al. Replacing Sedentary Time: Meta-analysis of Objective-Assessment Studies. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(3):395–402.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    Xiang Li, Tao Zhou, Hao Ma, Zhaoxia Liang, Vivian A Fonseca LQ. Replacement of Sedentary Behavior by Various Daily-Life Physical Activities and Structured Exercises: Genetic Risk and Incident Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2021;
  14. 14.↵
    Mekary RA, Ding EL. Isotemporal substitution as the gold standard model for physical activity epidemiology: Why it is the most appropriate for activity time research. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5):11–3.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Mlangeni L, Makola L, Naidoo I, Chibi B, Sokhela Z, Silimfe Z, et al. Factors Associated with Physical Activity in South Africa: Evidence from a National Population Based Survey. Open Public Health J. 2018;11(1):516–25.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    Dickie K, Micklesfield LK, Chantler S, Lambert E V, Goedecke JH. Meeting physical activity guidelines is associated with reduced risk for cardiovascular disease in black South African women; a 5.5-year follow-up study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):498.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.
    Chantler S, Dickie K, Micklesfield LK, Goedecke JH. Determinants of change in body weight and body fat distribution over 5.5 years in a sample of free-living black South African women. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016;27(6):367–74.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Gradidge PJ-L, Crowther NJ, Chirwa ED, Norris S a, Micklesfield LK. Patterns, levels and correlates of self-reported physical activity in urban black Soweto women. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):934.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.
    Coetzee A, Beukes A, Dreyer R, Solomon S, van Wyk L, Mistry R, et al. The prevalence and risk factors for diabetes mellitus in healthcare workers at Tygerberg hospital, Cape Town, South Africa: a retrospective study. J Endocrinol Metab Diabetes South Africa. 2019;24(3):77–82.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.
    Adedokun AO, Ter Goon D, Owolabi EO, Adeniyi OV, Ajayi AI. Prevalence, awareness, and determinants of type 2 diabetes mellitus among commercial taxi drivers in buffalo city metropolitan municipality South Africa: A cross-sectional survey. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(9):e14652.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    Mutyambizi C, Booysen F, Stokes A, Pavlova M, Groot W. Lifestyle and socio-economic inequalities in diabetes prevalence in South Africa: A decomposition analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):1–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Dowd KP, Szeklicki R, Minetto MA, Murphy MH, Polito A, Ghigo E, et al. A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: A DEDIPAC study. Vol. 15, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity; 2018. 1–33 p.
  23. 23.↵
    Sasai H. Assessing sedentary behavior using wearable devices: An overview and future directions. J Phys Fit Sport Med. 2017;6(3):135–43.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Rosenberger ME, Buman MP, Haskell WL, McConnell M V., Carstensen LL. Twenty-four Hours of Sleep, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity with Nine Wearable Devices. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(3):457–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Edwardson CL, Rowlands A V., Bunnewell S, Sanders J, Esliger DW, Gorely T, et al. Accuracy of posture allocation algorithms for thigh- and waist-worn accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(6):1085–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Clement N. Kufe, Lisa K. Micklesfield, Maphoko Masemola, Tinashe Chikowore, Andre Pascal Kengne, Fredrik Karpe, Shane A. Norris, Nigel J. Crowther, Tommy Olsson JHG. Increased Risk for Type 2 Diabetes in Relation to Adiposity in Middle-Aged Black South African Men compared to Women. medRxiv. 2021; medRxiv 20.
  27. 27.↵
    Lisa K. Micklesfield, Kate Westgate, Antonia Smith, Clement Kufe, Amy E. Mendham, Tim Lindsay, Katrien Wijndaele, Julia H. Goedecke SB. Physical activity and posture profile of a South African cohort of middle-aged men and women as determined by integrated hip and thigh accelerometry. 2 3. medRxiv. 2021; medRxiv 20.
  28. 28.↵
    Thomite/pampro. Thomite/pampro v0.4.0, Zenodo. Zenodo; 2018.
  29. 29.↵
    Van Hees VT, Fang Z, Langford J, Assah F, Mohammad A, Da Silva ICM, et al. Autocalibration of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity assessment using local gravity and temperature: An evaluation on four continents. J Appl Physiol. 2014;117(7):738–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: Comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(9):1462–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    DeFronzo RA, Matsuda M. Reduced time points to calculate the composite index. Vol. 33, Diabetes Care. 2010. p. 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Tura A, Kautzky-Willer A, Pacini G. Insulinogenic indices from insulin and C-peptide: Comparison of beta-cell function from OGTT and IVGTT. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006;72(3):298–301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inf. 2009;42(2):377–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. 35.↵
    Micklesfield LK, Goedecke JH, Punyanitya M, Wilson KE, Kelly TL. Dual-Energy X-Ray Performs as Well as Clinical Computed Tomography for the Measurement of Visceral Fat. Obesity. 2012;20(5):1109–14.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    Goedecke JH, Micklesfield LK. The effect of exercise on obesity, body fat distribution and risk for type 2 diabetes. Med Sport Sci. 2014;60(September):82–93.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    InterAct Consortium, Ekelund U, Palla L, Brage S, Franks PW, Peters T, Balkau B, Diaz MJ, Huerta JM, Agnoli C, Arriola L, Ardanaz E, Boeing H, Clavel-Chapelon F, Crowe F, Fagherazzi G, Groop L, Føns Johnsen N, Kaaks R, Khaw KT, Key TJ, de Lauzon-Guillain WN. Physical activity reduces the risk of incident type 2 diabetes in general and in abdominally lean and obese men and women: The EPIC-InterAct study. Diabetologia. 2012;55(7):1944–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    Eriksson KF, Lindgärde F. Prevention of Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus by diet and physical exercise The 6-year Malmö feasibility study. Diabetologia. 1991;34(12):891–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rosner B, Hennekens CH, et al. Physical activity and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. Lancet. 1991;338(8770):774–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Newsom SA, Everett AC, Hinko A, Horowitz JF. A single session of low-intensity exercise is sufficient to enhance insulin sensitivity into the next day in obese adults. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2516–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    Ponsonby AL, Sun C, Ukoumunne OC, Pezic A, Venn A, Shaw JE, et al. Objectively measured physical activity and the subsequent risk of incident dysglycemia: The Australian diabetes, obesity and lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Diabetes Care. 2011;34(7):1497–502.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Balkau B, Mhamdi L, Oppert JM, Nolan J, Golay A, Porcellati F, et al. Physical activity and insulin sensitivity the RISC study. Diabetes. 2008;57(10):2613–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    Healy GN, Winkler EAH, Owen N, Anuradha S, Dunstan DW. Replacing sitting time with standing or stepping: Associations with cardio-metabolic risk biomarkers. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(39):2643–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    Yates T, Henson J, Edwardson C, Dunstan D, Bodicoat DH, Khunti K, et al. Objectively measured sedentary time and associations with insulin sensitivity: Importance of reallocating sedentary time to physical activity. Prev Med (Baltim). 2015;76:79–83.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    Dickie K, Micklesfield LK, Chantler S, Lambert E V., Goedecke JH. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Light-Intensity Physical Activity Are Independently Associated with Reduced Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Urban Black South African Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2016;14(1):23–32.
    OpenUrl
  46. 46.↵
    Hanson SK, Munthali RJ, Micklesfield LK, Lobelo F, Cunningham SA, Hartman TJ, et al. Longitudinal patterns of physical activity, sedentary behavior and sleep in urban South African adolescents, Birth-To-Twenty Plus cohort. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):241.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    Llavero-Valero M, Escalada-San Martín J, Martínez-González MA, Basterra-Gortari FJ, Gea A, Bes-Rastrollo M. Physical Activity Intensity and Type 2 Diabetes: Isotemporal Substitution Models in the “Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra” (SUN) Cohort. J Clin Med. 2021;10(13):2744.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.↵
    Prioreschi A, Brage S, Westgate K, Norris SA, Micklesfield LK. Cardiorespiratory fitness levels and associations with physical activity and body composition in young South African adults from Soweto. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):1–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    Fortuin-De Smidt MC, Mendham AE, Hauksson J, Hakim O, Stefanovski D, Clamp L, et al. Effect of exercise training on insulin sensitivity, hyperinsulinemia and ectopic fat in black South African women: A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Endocrinol. 2020;183(1):51–61.
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    Goedecke JH, Olsson T. Pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes risk in black Africans: a South African perspective. J Intern Med. 2020;1–11.
Back to top
Posted February 09, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
Physical behaviours and their association with type 2 diabetes risk in urban South African middle-aged adults: An isotemporal substitution approach
Clement N. Kufe, Julia H. Goedecke, Maphoko Masemola, Tinashe Chikowore, Melikhaya Soboyisi, Antonia Smith, Kate Westgate, Soren Brage, Lisa K. Micklesfield
medRxiv 2022.02.08.22270616; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.08.22270616
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area