Abstract
Importance While comprehensive tumor molecular profile by whole exome and RNA sequencing (WES/RNA-Seq) is now feasible in routine practice, it remains unclear whether this increases therapeutic options as compared to a more limited targeted gene panel (TGP) plus array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in advanced cancer patients.
Objective To determine the added value of WES/RNA-Seq in advanced and refractory cancer patients who had no molecular-based treatment recommendation (MBTR) based on a TGP/aCGH in the course of a clinical trial.
Design Retrospective analysis.
Setting Single center.
Participants We selected 50 patients previously included in the PROFILER trial (NCT01774409) for which no molecular-based therapy could be recommended in the course of the clinical trial based on a targeted 90-gene panel and aCGH. For each patient, the frozen tumor sample mirroring the FFPE sample used for TGP/aCGH analysis were processed for WES and RNA-Seq. Data from TGP/aCGH were reanalyzed and together with WES/RNA-Seq, findings were simultaneously discussed at a new molecular tumor board (MTB).
Main outcomes and Measures MBTR based on TGP/aCGH versus WES/RNA-Seq were compared.
Results After exclusion of variants of unknown significance, a total of 167 somatic molecular alterations were identified in 50 patients (median: 3; range: 1-10). Out of these 167 relevant molecular alterations reported by the biologist, 51 (31%) were common to both TGP/aCGH and WES/RNA-Seq, 19 (11%) were identified by the TGP/aCGH only and 97 (58%) were identified by WES/RNA-Seq only, including 2 fusion transcripts in two patients. A MBRT was provided in 4/50 (8%) patients using the information from TGP/aCGH vs. 9/50 (18%) patients using WES/RNA-Seq findings. Three patients had similar recommendations based on TGP/aCGH and WES/RNA-Seq.
Conclusion and Relevance In advanced and refractory cancer patients in whom no MBRT was recommended from TGP/aCGH, WES/RNA-Seq allowed to identify more alterations which may in turn, in a limited fraction of patients, lead to new MBRT.
Question Does WES/RNA-Seq provide additional targeted treatment guidance for advanced cancer patients with no molecular-based treatment recommendation (MBTR) from a 90-tumor gene panel (TGP) sequencing and array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH)?
Findings For fifty advanced cancer patients included in the PROFILER trial with no treatment recommendation based on a TGP/aCGH, frozen tumor sample was processed for WES and RNA-Seq. MBTR was given in 4/50 (8%) patients using the reanalyzed TGP/aCGH vs. 9/50 (18%) patients using WES/RNA-Seq findings.
Meanings WES/RNA-Seq increased the number of patients with MBTR as compared to a TGP/aCGH screening to yet only a minority of patients.
Competing Interest Statement
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: all authors had financial support from the Integrated Cancer Research Site LYriCAN (INCa-DGOS-Inserm_12563), NetSARC (INCA & DGOS), InterSARC (INCA), LabEx DEvweCAN (ANR-10-LABX 0061), PIA Institut Convergence Francois Rabelais PLAsCAN (PLASCAN, 17-CONV-0002), Fondation ARC contre le Cancer, La Ligue contre le Cancer (Canopee), and EURACAN (EC 739521).
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Integrated Cancer Research Site LYriCAN (INCa-DGOS-Inserm_12563), NetSARC (INCA & DGOS),InterSARC (INCA), LabEx DEvweCAN (ANR-10-LABX 0061), PIA Institut Convergence Francois Rabelais PLAsCAN (PLASCAN, 17-CONV-0002), Fondation ARC contre le Cancer, La Ligue contre le Cancer (Canopee), and EURACAN (EC 739521).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Centre Leon Berard gave the ethical approval for this work on 2/2/2018.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding information : This work was supported by funding from the Integrated Cancer Research Site LYriCAN (INCa-DGOS-Inserm_12563), NetSARC (INCA & DGOS), InterSARC (INCA), LabEx DEvweCAN (ANR-10-LABX 0061), PIA Institut Convergence Francois Rabelais PLAsCAN (PLASCAN, 17-CONV-0002), Fondation ARC contre le Cancer, La Ligue contre le Cancer (Canopée), and EURACAN (EC 739521).
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, The University of Edinburgh, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos