ABSTRACT
Background In the context of the current opioid crisis, there is a growing interest in evaluating non-pharmacological solutions to manage post-operative pain. Evidence supports the concept that auriculotherapy may provide significant analgesia
Objective Investigating the efficacy of cryo-auriculotherapy to reduce postoperative opioid consumption following a rotator cuff surgery.
Settings Academic medical center, USA
Methods This trial was registered to Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03860259). A total of 39 subjects undergoing rotator cuff surgery and randomized to receive either an active cryo-auriculotherapy treatment (Auriculotherapy; n=20) or a placebo treatment (placebo; n=19) were included in the analysis. For each cryo-auriculotherapy subject, the treatment was performed in the recovery room. The primary endpoint was overall opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalent = OME). Secondary endpoints included pain and overall non-narcotic analgesic consumption on postoperative day 5, patient satisfaction and function recovery using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), time to discharge from the recovery room and the hospital and patient satisfaction, as well as the number of subjects from each group readmitted because of pain-related issues.
Results The use of cryo-auriculotherapy was associated with a 35% decrease in total opioid requirement over the first five-day recovery period and a 15% decrease in pain with movement. Pain with movement in the auriculotherapy group remained lower compared to the placebo group for at least 14 days (4.47 ± 2.12 vs 5.84 ± 2.39, respectively; p=0.0394).
Conclusions Our data suggests that cryo-auriculotherapy represents an alternative to opioids in patients undergoing rotator-cuff surgery.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT03860259
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Biomedical Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Pittsburgh (STUDY18050099).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Subject Area
Reviews and Context
0
Comment
0
TRIP Peer Reviews
0
Community Reviews
0
Automated Services
0
Blogs/Media
Author Videos