Abstract
Context In recent decades there has been a shift from a reimbursement system based upon treatment “volume” to “value.”
Aims To compare value, quality, and cost of three treatment modalities for early childhood caries: surgical care with and without general anesthesia, and non-surgical care with disease management.
Settings and Design Through an analytical, observational, cross-sectional design, data was collected from 487 pediatric subjects treated at health centers in seven states. Nearly 95% of the subjects were beneficiaries of the United States government Medicaid health insurance program, which supports families with low socioeconomic status.
Methods and Material Quality was measured with a Parental-Reported Symptom and Service Quality questionnaire, adapted from the validated Early Child Oral Health Impact Scale, Child-Oral Impacts on Daily Performance, and Dental Consumer Assessments of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys. Cost was measured by the labor cost for clinicians and adjusted by total relative value units for all treatment procedures. Value was calculated as the quotient of the weighted quality score and the adjusted cost, multiplied by a coefficient.
Statistical Analysis Value comparisons were analyzed using chi-square, ANOVA, and likelihood ratio tests.
Results Children treated with non-surgical, disease management had significantly higher parental-perceived quality, lower cost, and higher value when compared to the two surgical treatment modalities.
Conclusions Dentists should consider that non-surgical treatment yields higher “value” than surgical treatments for the management of early childhood caries. Payers and consumers would benefit by comparing treatment “value” when choosing institutions and providers for the management of early childhood caries.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Hansjorg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, Division of Dental Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of NYU Grossman School of Medicine gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: None
Institutional Support: Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, Division of Dental Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
1. Institutional Support updated to “Hansjorg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, Division of Dental Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.” 2. Email addresses for co-authors updated.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author
