Abstract
Background The vaginal microbiome is an underexplored environment which may yield insights about endometrial cancer (EC) pathophysiology and serve as an early marker of disease. Our objective was to evaluate the preoperative vaginal microbiome in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions and EC to identify patterns which could segregate benign disease from EC, and to assess if the microbiome distinguishes low-grade (LG) from high-grade (HG) histologies.
Methods Vaginal microbiome samples were prospectively collected at the time of hysterectomy, and clinicopathologic data collected. Extracted DNA underwent shotgun metagenomics sequencing. Microbial diversity was calculated using the Shannon Index (α-diversity) and PERMANOVA (β-diversity). Hierarchical clustering was used to describe community state types (CST), which were then compared by microbial diversity and grade. Machine learning was utilized to assess the predictive value of grade and histology based on relative bacterial abundance.
Results 61 patients participated: 1) benign gynecologic disease (n=11), 2) LG EC (n=30), and 3) HG EC (n=20). 40 (62.5%) were White, 22 (34.3%) were Black, and 37 (57.8%) were Hispanic. Both α- and β-diversity were associated with tumor grade (p□=□0.026 and p□=□0.035, respectively). Four CST were identified that associated with grade of disease (p=0.036). Different histologies demonstrated variation in CST even within tumor grades (p=0.017). Markers at the species level informed models that predicted benign vs cancer (AUC 0.878), HG versus benign (AUC=0.803), and HG versus LG (AUC=0.771) with high accuracy.
Conclusions The vaginal microbiome segregates benign disease from EC, and is predictive of histology and grade, suggesting it may be an effective tool for screening.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The research was supported by the Jay Weiss Institute for Health Disparities Research, the Ruth Helen O'Bryan Wright/Gyn Precision Medicine Initiative, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Florida Health Cancer Center, National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under (P30CA240139).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional Review Board at the University of Miami gave ethical approval for this work (protocol #20170660)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, the Sergey Brin Family Foundation, California Institute of Technology, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Imperial College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University, University of Washington, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.