ABSTRACT
Importance Selected glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have cardioprotective effects in patients with type 2 diabetes and elevated cardiovascular risk. Prescription of these agents by clinicians and their consistent use by patients are essential to realize their benefits.
Objective To assess the patterns of use and prescription fills of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2i.
Design Cross-sectional for medication use and prospective for prescription fills in 2018-2020
Setting Nationwide de-identified US administrative claims database of Medicare Advantage and commercially insured adults.
Participants Individuals 18 years of age and older with type 2 diabetes
Exposures Comorbidities representing guideline-directed indications of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) for GLP-1RAs, and ASCVD, heart failure, and diabetic nephropathy for SGLT2i.
Main Outcomes and Measures Medication use and monthly fill rates for 12 months following initiation of therapy by calculating the proportion of days with consistent medication use.
Results Among 587,657 individuals with type 2 diabetes, 80,196 (13.6%) were prescribed GLP-1RAs and 68,149 (11.5%) SGLT2i during 2018-2020. This represented 12.9% and 10.5% of individuals with indications for each medication, respectively. Based on monthly counts of new prescriptions, there were no changes in the uptake of either drug class during 2019-2020. Among new initiators, fill rate was 52.5% for GLP-1RAs and 52.9% for SGLT2i one year after initiation. One-year fill rates were higher for patients with commercial insurance than those with Medicare Advantage plans for both GLP-1RAs (59.3% vs 51.0%, p-value<0.001) and SGLT2i (63.4% vs 50.3%, p-value<0.001). After adjusting for comorbidity profile, there were higher prescription fills for patients with commercial insurance (versus Medicare Advantage, OR 1.17, 95% CI [1.06-1.29] for GLP-1RAs, and 1.59 [1.42-1.77] for SGLT2i); and higher income (top quartile versus others, OR 1.09 [1.06-1.12] for GLP-1RAs, and 1.06 [1.03-1.10] for SGLT2i).
Conclusions and Relevance In 2018-2020, use of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i remained limited to fewer than 1 in 8 individuals with type 2 diabetes meeting criteria for evidence-based guideline and professional society recommendations, with one-year fill rates around 50%. The low and inconsistent use of these medications compromises their longitudinal health outcomes benefits in a period of expanding indications for their use.
Competing Interest Statement
Callahan Clark, Abraham Reddy, and Samuel Amodeo are full time employees of UnitedHealth Group and own stock in the company. Marc Suchard reports grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study and grants from Janssen Research and Development outside the submitted work. Darren McGuire reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi US, Merck & Co., Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp., Eli Lilly and Company, NovoNordisk, AstraZeneca, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Pfizer, Metavant, Applied Therapeutics, Afimmune, Bayer, CSL Behring and Esperion. Zhenqiu Lin works under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to develop quality measures. Silvio Inzucchi has received honoraria or consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Lexicon, Merck, vTv Therapeutics, Esperion, and Abbott. Evangelos Oikonomou and Rohan Khera are coinventors of US Provisional Patent Application No. 63/177,117, Methods for neighborhood phenomapping for clinical trials and are co-founders of Evidence2Health, a precision health and digital health analytics platform. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose.
Funding Statement
The study was funded by Research & Development at UnitedHealth Group, and the authors Callahan Clark, Abraham Reddy, and Samuel Amodeo are full-time employees of the UnitedHealth Group. These authors played an active role in all aspects of the development of the study, including design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The study was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award, 1K23HL153775 to Dr. Khera. The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The UnitedHealth Group Office of Human Research and the Yale Institutional Review Board exempted this study from review and waived informed consent as the study was limited to retrospective analyses of de-identified data and compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data are proprietary and are not available for open sharing due to restrictions on our data use agreement
