1 Abstract
Since the COVID-19 pandemic there has been a rapid uptake and utilisation of telemedicine in all aspects of healthcare. This presents a key opportunity in surgical site infection surveillance. Remote follow up methods have been used via telephone, with photographs and questionnaires for post-operative reviews with varying results.
This review therefore aims to comprehensively synthesise available evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of all forms of SSI telemedicine monitoring. The protocol has been established as per both PRISMA-P and the Cochrane handbook for reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and CINAHL will be searched using a complete search strategy developed with librarian input, in addition to google scholar and hand searching. All study designs with patients over 18 and undergone a primarily closed surgical procedure will be eligible. Index tests will include all forms of telemedicine and a subgroup analysis performed for each of these. Comparative tests must include face to face review, and all reference standards will be included again for sub-group analyses. Search results will be screened by two investigators independently with a third providing consensus review on disagreements. Methodological quality will be assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, first validated by two investigators as per the Cochrane handbook.
Exploratory analysis will formulate summary receiver operating characteristic curves and forest plots with estimates of sensitivity and specificity of the included studies. Sources of heterogeneity will be identifying and investigated through further analysis.
Potential benefits of telemedicine integration in surgical practice will reduce cost and travel time to patients in addition to avoiding wasted clinic appointments, important considerations in a peri-pandemic era. To avoid missed or further complications, there must be confidence in the ability to diagnose infection. This review will systematically determine whether telemedicine is accurate for surgical site infection diagnosis, which methods are well established and if further research is indicated.
Amendments Protocol version number will be annotated on the title page and thereby footer of each page. A list of major amendment changes to the protocol will be kept in the table below.
Definitions Surgical Site Infection An infection occurring after surgery in the part of the body where surgery took place
Telemedicine The remote diagnosis and treatment of patients by means of communications technology
Telehealth The delivery of healthcare services, where patients and providers are separated by distance.
eHealth The use of information communication technology for health.
mHealth A component of eHealth where medical and public health practices are supported by mobile devices.
Virtual Care All the ways healthcare providers remotely interact with their patients
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Sponsor: Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, R&D Department, Office 13, 2nd Floor Daisy Building, Castle Hill Hospital, Castle Rd, Cottingham, East Yorkshire HU16 5JQ.
Funder: Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, Hull Royal Infirmary The funder has not influenced the development of this protocol.
The sponsor has not influenced the development of this protocol.
Authors: Ross Lathan: Corresponding Author Protocol development, Literature search and screening, data extraction and analysis, final review
Misha Sidapra: Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Literature search and screening, data extraction and analysis, final review
Marina Yiasemidou: Bradford University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Final review drafting
Judith Long: Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Final review drafting
Joshua Totty: Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Protocol development, final review drafting
George Smith: Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Final review drafting
Ian Chetter: Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Final review drafting
Data Availability
No data is produced in this protocol
