Abstract
Firms in the food industry may experience more than one contamination incident over time. In the context of food safety, increasing the interval between foodborne outbreaks represents a key objective for both the food industry and public health officials. We demonstrate a systematic approach to analyzing repeated recalls, specifically to evaluate factors influencing the time until the next recall and, more importantly, to identify the extent of organizational learning from inter-event times. An analysis of meat and poultry recalls issued by publicly traded firms in the United States between 1994-2015 indicates that more diversified firms face a lower risk of repeat recalls as firm size expands, compared to firms primarily producing meat and poultry products. The hazard of a recall incident decreases with the severity of the previous recall. Some evidence of firm learning is found, but there is no definitive evidence indicating that a firm’s ability to prevent recalls improves with the number of foodborne outbreaks it has experienced.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by the UEAS at Utah State University.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
∗ We would like to acknowledge the comments and feedback we received from audiences at various venues, including the AEA/ASSA, AAEA, AARES, CAES, and the Asian Meeting of the Econometric Society. This study was funded by the UAES projects 1198 and 1577. The authors declare that they have no relevant or material financial interests that relate to the research described in this paper.
JEL: L66; D22; Q18.
a) Discussions in Sections 1-6; b) Literature review; c) Presentation of the results.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
