ABSTRACT
As SARS-CoV-2 variants emerge, there is a critical need to understand the effectiveness of serum elicited by different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. A reference reagent comprised of post-vaccination sera from recipients of different vaccines allows evaluation of in vitro variant neutralization, and provides a reference for comparing assay results across laboratories. We prepared and pooled >1 L serum from donors who received the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2, Pfizer and mRNA-1273, Moderna), a replication-incompetent adenovirus type 26 vaccine (Ad26.COV2.S, Johnson and Johnson), or recombinant spike protein expressed by baculovirus incorporated into a nanoparticle vaccine plus Matrix-M adjuvant (NVX-CoV2373, Novavax). Twice frozen sera were aliquoted and are available for distribution to the research community (BEI Resources). The calculated WHO titer of pooled sera to spike protein was 1,312, 1,447, 1,936, and 587 and the reciprocal RBD binding to ACE-2 IC90-titers were 60, 64, 118, and 46 for BNT162b2, mRNA1273, Ad26.CoV2373, and NVX-CoV2373 sera, respectively.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by an intramural program at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, and the HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) Countermeasures Acceleration Group (CAG), the Iowa City Veterans Administration Healthcare System, and by a Merit Review Grant (BX 000207, JTS). The project was funded in part with Federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract No. HHSN272201600013C, managed by ATCC.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
University of Iowa Institutional Review Board Committee A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are availble upon reasonable request to the authors.
