Abstract
Introduction Immunosenescence leads to increased morbidity and mortality associated with viral infections and weaker vaccine responses. This has been well documented for seasonal influenza and the current pandemic with Sars-Cov2, which disproportionately impact older adults, particularly those in residential aged care facilities. Inadequate nutrient intake associated with impaired immunity, respiratory and muscle function are likely to augment the effects of immunosenescence. In this study, we test whether the effects of inadequate nutrition can be reversed by multi-nutrient supplementation, consequently enhancing vaccine responses, reducing the risk of viral infections, and improving respiratory and muscle function.
Methods and analysis The Pomerium Study is a 12-week, single-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial testing the effects of two daily servings of an oral multi-nutrient supplement (330 kcal, 20g protein, 1.2g CaHMB, 449mg calcium, 520IU vitamin D3, and 25 vitamins and minerals) on the immune system and muscle and respiratory function of older adults in aged-care in Melbourne, Australia. 160 older adults (≥75 years old) will be recruited from aged-care facilities and randomised to treatment (multi-nutrient supplement) or control (usual care). Primary outcome is the change in T-cell subsets CD8+ and CD28null counts at 4 and 12 weeks post-intervention. Secondary outcomes measured at baseline and after 12 weeks post-intervention are multiple markers of immunosenescence, body composition (bioimpedance), handgrip strength (dynamometer), physical function (short physical performance battery), respiratory function (spirometry), and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L). Incidence and complications of COVID-19 and/or viral infections (i.e., hospitalisation, complications, or death) will be recorded throughout the trial.
Discussion If the Pomerium Study demonstrates efficacy and safety of a multi-nutrient supplement on immune, muscle and respiratory function, it may be suitable as a strategy to reduce the adverse outcomes from seasonal influenza and viral infections such as COVID-19 in older adults in aged-care.
Funding, Ethics, Registration and Dissemination The study is funded by the Australian Medical Research Future Fund. It is approved by Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref No. HREC/73985/MH-2021, ERM Ref No. RMH73985, Melbourne Health Site Ref No. 2021.115), and registered at ANZCTR (12621000420842). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and made available to aged-care stakeholders, including providers, residents, and government bodies.
Article Summary Strengths and Limitations
This is the first study performing a comprehensive immune, respiratory and functional assessment in aged care residents after receiving a multi-nutrient solution that is commercially available.
Our design and tested intervention assure that the results of the study will be rapidly translated into practice.
The main limitation is that any biological effect observed cannot be attributed to one component of the multi-nutrient supplement.
Another limitation is that the potential effect of group differences in energy intake on outcomes can only be monitored by assessing regular dietary intake and weight changes during the study period.
INTRODUCTION
Ageing is characterised by a decline in immune function known as immunosenescence.1 This process reduces resistance to infectious diseases (e.g., pneumonia, influenza, meningitis, and urinary tract infections).2 During a pandemic, the concept of immunosenescence is of relevance as older adults, particularly those living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs), are at high risk of acquiring infectious diseases and experiencing more adverse outcomes.2,3 Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors contribute to the predisposition of institutionalised older adults to respiratory viral infections. Intrinsic risk factors include immunosenescence, malnutrition, low serum levels of vitamin D, limited mobility, poor muscular and respiratory function, and comorbidities.4-6 Extrinsic factors include lack of appropriate infection control procedures, and limited access to personal protective equipment.7 Vaccination to viral assaults is the primary preventative strategy to reduce both onset and severity of viral infection.7
Malnutrition is common in aged-care residents8 and is associated with compromised immune profile (i.e., lower levels of T-cell subsets (CD8+ CD28null), high NK:CD4+ T cell ratio, and low serum levels of interleukin (IL)-7).1,8,9,10,11 Dietary protein contains immunoglobins that protect against antigens,12 and vitamin D modulates immune function by stimulating the differentiation of regulatory T and B cells.13 Inadequate protein intakes and vitamin D deficiency are common in older adults in aged care.14-16 On average daily protein intake of 0.8 g/kg bodyweight have been observed in older adults living in Australian residential aged care;11 an amount considered insufficient supporting optimal immune and musculoskeletal function.17 Furthermore, up to 77.5% of older adults in aged-care are vitamin D deficient (serum 25(OH)D levels < 50 nmol/L),18,19 and inappropriate vitamin D levels are associated with reduced severity and mortality from COVID-19.20,21
Sarcopenia is a progressive and generalised skeletal muscle disorder characterised by decreased muscle quality, quantity and function.22,23 This process is particularly evident in respiratory muscles,24 where it impairs the ability to produce appropriate tidal volume25 and perform high force expulsive airway clearance manoeuvres.26 Multiple studies have shown that area of the pectoralis, psoas, and paravertebral muscles on cross-sectional CT images is associated with lean muscle mass, handgrip strength, sarcopenia, and health.23,27,28 Sarcopenia was also evident in COVID-19 patients.29,30 Baseline sarcopenia was independently associated with a prolonged hospital stay in patients with COVID-19.31 Higher paraspinal muscle radiodensity, a proxy measure of lower muscle fat deposition, was associated with a reduced risk of disease deterioration and decreased likelihood of prolonged viral shedding among female patients with severe COVID-19.32 In addition to the well-known independent risk factors (i.e. age, obesity, COPD, and C-reactive protein (CRP) level), low grip strength is independently associated with increased severity of COVID-19.33 Moreover, decreased muscle strength is an independent risk factor for COVID-19 severity in adults 50 years of age or older.34 Therefore, low muscle mass and strength are considered risk factors for COVID-19 severity.35,36
Of the nutrients purported to support immune and musculoskeletal function, whey protein contains bioactive immunoglobins (such as lactoferrin) with immunostimulatory properties,12 as well as essential amino acids (in particular leucine) required for muscle protein synthesis.37,38 Another potent stimulator of muscle protein synthesis is calcium β-hydroxy-β-methyl-butyrate (caHMB),39 a leucine metabolite, which appears to offer complementary benefits to leucine by simultaneously dampening muscle proteolysis.40 This may be important for older adults with compromised immune function and/or sarcopenia, where chronic-low grade inflammation may be driving muscle loss.41,42 Vitamin D also interacts with protein to support this anabolic signalling network, and sufficient vitamin D levels (> 50 nmol/L) may be required for protein to increase muscle mass as observed in animal models and older adults with sarcopenia.43,44
Several other vitamins and minerals, such as calcium and iron that act as cofactors in metabolism41,45 may help support the immune, respiratory and musculoskeletal systems and reduce the risk of adverse events in this population, such as falls, fractures and respiratory infections.45 An RCT involving 157 older adults (>65 years) living in long-term care supplemented with a nutrition formula that contained triacylglycerol, protein, antioxidants, selenium, zinc, and 28 vitamins and minerals for 4 weeks, demonstrated enhanced immune function as indicated by increased influenza vaccine response and lymphocyte activation, less fever, and fewer days of symptoms of upper respiratory tract infections.46 Similar improvements to response to influenza and pneumococcal vaccination have been observed in older adults living in the community provided similar nutritional supplements.47,48 Therefore, correcting nutritional inadequacy is a viable option to support immune, muscle and respiratory function in older adults living in aged-care.
The aim of this 12-week single-blind, randomised controlled study (Protocol version 2.0) is to test the effects of two daily servings of a multi-nutrient supplement (containing whey protein, leucine, CaHMB, vitamin D3, calcium plus 25 vitamins and minerals) on the immune system and muscle and respiratory function of older adults in aged-care. We hypothesise that provision of this multi-nutrient supplement will improve multiple immune and functional variables and reduce the number and severity of cases of respiratory viral infections. To test this hypothesis, we propose measuring T-cell subsets (CD8+ CD28null) as our primary outcome. Our secondary outcome measures include a comprehensive immune profile (cell counts and serum cytokines), body composition (bioimpedance), handgrip strength (dynamometer), physical function (short physical performance battery), respiratory function (spirometry), and quality of life (QoL) (EQ-5D-3L).
METHODS AND ANALYSIS
Trial design and population
This is a 12-week parallel group single-blinded (only assessors blinded) randomised controlled trial involving 160 older adults living in aged-care, randomised to either two daily doses of a multi-nutrient supplement (treatment) (Appendix 1) or usual care (control) (Figure 1). Participants will also be assessed 12 weeks after supplementation ceases. Assessments will be performed at baseline (immune, serum, respiratory and muscle-related measures, and QoL), week 4 (immune and serum only), week 12 (immune, serum & other measures) and 12 weeks following cessation of supplementation (event recording only). The trial will follow the CONSORT guidelines for reporting randomised trials.49
Patient and Public Involvement
The research question and methodology were based on previous experience by the investigators testing nutritional interventions in aged care residents, including surveying their preferences asking for their feedback and acceptance of the multi-nutrient solutions.11,50 Our Consumer Representative at the Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS) participated in the design of this protocol and is also an Associate Investigator in the grant application. Results will be disseminated via regular reports submitted to the participating aged care facilities and distributed amongst the participants and their families.
Recruitment
RACFs managers will be contacted to determine their willingness to be involved in the trial and encourage residents’ participation. Agreement with the aged-care manager will be formalised via an agreement document between the RACF and the research institute conducting the trial. Recruitment of participants will involve promoting the trial in facility newsletters and presenting the trial to residents and their families at resident and relative meetings. This recruitment method has been successfully used in the past.50,51
Trial population and randomisation
The target population is sarcopenic aged-care residents aged 75 years and older that may or may not have received a COVID-19 or seasonal influenza vaccination. Sarcopenia will be diagnosed using the Sarcopenia Definition and Outcomes Consortium criteria.52 In addition to the presence of sarcopenia, participants must meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria to participate (Table 1), which include capacity to participate and ingest the multi-nutrient treatment. The trial statistician will generate the randomisation sequence using permuted block design stratified by aged care facility and uploaded to research electronic data capture (REDCap). Treatment allocation will be concealed until the time of the randomisation.
Testing procedures
The visit schedule is illustrated in Figure 1, and assessments are presented in Table 2. The visit schedule consists of screening (visit 1), baseline/randomisation (visit 2), immune function (visit 3), final (visit 4), and 12-week follow up (visit 5) assessments. It is anticipated that the time commitment for participants will be between 30 to 60 minutes per visit.
Immune and nutritional profile
Non-fasting blood (25 mL) will be collected by venepuncture by trained personnel. Twenty mL will be analysed by flow cytometry (Aurora®) to quantify full blood counts, T and B cell counts and their subsets (particularly T-cell subsets CD8+ and CD28null) and other surface phenotypes of immunosenescence (Table 3). Serum concentrations of 40 interleukins (Appendix 2) will be quantified at the Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS) using a MILLIPLEX MAP Human Cytokine/Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel (Millipore). Serum vitamin D, calcium and albumin will be assayed at Dorevitch Pathology (Melbourne, Australia) using validated techniques.53
Physical function
Handgrip strength
Assessed using a Jamar hydraulic dynamometer (Sammons Preston Inc. Bolingbrook, IL). Participants will be seated with their arm resting (at 90 degrees) on the chair arm and instructed to squeeze the dynamometer at maximal effort (test is performed 3 times on each side with 30□seconds rest between each test). The highest results of three attempts will be recorded.
Gait Speed
Measured as the time to walk 6 meters at normal speed using a stopwatch. The use of walking aids (e.g., cane, walker) will be recorded. Three tests (3 min between) are performed with the best speed recorded.54
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Will be used to assess lower extremity function using tasks that mimic daily activities. The SPPB examines static balance, gait speed, and lower body strength. Balance assessments are composed of three tasks that become progressively more challenging, i.e. standing unaided for 10 seconds with feet together, feet in semi tandem (one foot in front of the other foot, with the big toe of the back foot in the groove of the front foot) and full tandem position.55 The 5 times sit-to-stand test is performed with the participant starting in the seated position. After confirming the ability to perform one sit-to-stand action (chair arms for help with balance), participants are instructed to stand and sit 5 times as quickly as possible, ensuring feet are flat on the floor. Scores are allocated according to performance, with an overall maximum score of 12 (0-6 is low performance, 7-9 moderate and 10-12 high performance).56
Body Composition
Bioelectrical Impedance (TIDC360S, Tanita, Wedderburn, Australia) will be used to calculate body composition after calibrating the device for the following variables: weight, height, age, and sex.
Vital signs
Blood pressure (BP) will be measured by trained personal in a seated position using an automated electronic BP monitor. Heart rate and temperature will also be recorded.
Respiratory function
Spirometry (Forced Expiratory Vital Capacity in 1 second (FEV1), Forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC ratio) pre- and post-salbutamol will be assessed using a calibrated portable hand-held Micro spirometer (CareFusion, Kent, United Kingdom) and performed to American Thoracic Society (ATS) standards with predicted values from NHANES III. 57
Anthropometry
Height (digital stadiometer, (SECA20)) and weight (homologated electronic balance (SECA20)) will be measured with the participant barefoot (or wearing socks or stockings) and wearing light clothing. BMI (weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) will be calculated. Nutritional status will be assessed using the long Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) tool,58 a validated instrument that contains 18 items and evaluates four different aspects of nutritional status: anthropometric assessment (body mass index (BMI), weight loss, and arm and calf circumferences); general assessment (lifestyle, medication, mobility and presence of signs of depression or dementia); short dietary assessment (number of meals, food and fluid intake and autonomy of feeding); and subjective assessment (self-perception of health and nutrition).
Quality of life (QoL)
Assessed using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire.59 Briefly, the questionnaire enables comparisons of quality of life across different diseases or health states using a single score and has five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression)
Nursing Home Life-Space Diameter instrument
Used to identify social isolation and self-restricted life-space mobility.60 This instrument, which is measured over two weeks, separates a patient’s living area into four spaces: their room, outside the room but within the unit, outside the unit but within the facility, and outside the facility.
Dietary intake
Determined on two random days using the validated method of visual estimation of plate waste.61 Standard serves will be weighed on a digital food scale (±1g) (Soehnle Page Profi), and foods and beverages served and wasted will be compared against the standard serve using a seven-point scale. The 7-point scale represents portions of each food consumed (or remaining): 0=no food remaining, +M=1 mouthful remaining, 1/4=25% remaining, 1/2=50% remaining, 3/4=75% remaining, −M=1 mouthful consumed (90% remaining), 1=no food eaten. Meals served will be rated against the standard meal (medium given the value of 100%); small serving = 75%, large serving = 125%, extra-large serving = 150%. Consumption will be calculated as the difference between amounts served and wasted.
Medical record review
Medical history, documented cases of COVID-19 and/or respiratory viral infections will be collected from the participant’s medical records, including details of serious adverse outcomes (hospitalisation, complications, or death).
Adverse events (AE)
All compulsory incident reports documented at each facility will be reviewed, and any adverse events reported for study participants will be recorded. AE are defined as any untoward medical occurrence(s) in a study participant that may or may not be temporally or causally associated with the use of the multi-nutrient supplement and is considered serious if it results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, or results in persistent or significant disability.
Study Visits (Figure 1)
Visit 1 – Screening
Informed Consent is obtained before study assessments commence
Medication use (existing therapies or therapies changed or ceased in the last 3 months) will be documented.
Visit 2 – Randomisation
Vital signs, weight, MNA; Physical Performance Assessment
SPPB, gait speed and handgrip strength
Body composition
Nursing Home Life-Space Diameter instrument
QoL
Respiratory function
Non-fasting blood sample (immune and nutritional profile)
Visit 3 (4 weeks)
Non-fasting blood sample (immune and nutritional profile)
Concomitant medication and AE record
Visit 4 (12 weeks) (similar assessment to visit 2)
Document cases, severity, and outcomes of COVID-19 and/or respiratory viral infections
Non-fasting blood sample (immune and nutritional profile)
Concomitant medication and AE record
Visit 5 (24 weeks; 12 weeks after cessation of supplementation)
Document cases, severity, and outcomes of COVID-19 and/or respiratory viral infections
Unscheduled Visits
If deemed by the Investigators that additional assessments are required for medical or safety reasons.
Treatment
Multi-nutrient manipulation and storage
After screening, eligible participants will be randomised (as described earlier) to receive two daily 220 ml bottles of the multi-nutrient supplement (intervention) (Appendix 1) or usual care (control). The multi-nutrient supplement will be supplied to the facility by an assigned investigator, handled and stored safely and properly, and kept in a secure location that only the assigned investigator and designated staff at the facility have access to. Upon receipt, the multi-nutrient supplement will be stored according to the instructions specified by the manufacturer. Where possible, the multi-nutrient supplement will be refrigerated at 5 degrees at the aged care facility prior to administration. Documentation of the dispensing process will be maintained.
Potential side effects and monitoring
The multi-nutrient supplement is listed in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods. The dose used in this study is the amount recommended by the manufacturer (Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Australia). The potential risks from consuming the multi-nutrient supplement are considered similar to other commercially available supplements.
Two daily doses of the multi-nutrient supplement provide 1,000 IU of vitamin D. The Institute of Medicine has set the dose of 4000 IU per day as the Tolerable Upper Limit, so total vitamin D intake, including that from other supplements, will be recorded. Participants will be monitored for signs of toxicity (nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, or frequent urination) and blood 25(OH)D and calcium levels evaluated at baseline and visit 4. A clinical trials monitoring committee is established at the research institute. Any AEs will be communicated to this committee, and action will be taken based on the severity of the event.
Treatment Compliance
Compliance will be monitored weekly with all bottles returned to the research institute and unused product measured and recorded.
Treatment blinding
Staff involved in assessments will be blinded to treatment allocation. Randomisation data will be kept confidential and only accessible by designated authorised, un-blinded study personnel. Unblinding will only occur in the case of participant emergencies and at the conclusion of the study and statistical analyses.
Participant withdrawal
Participation will be discontinued if the investigator or the monitoring committee deems that continuing study treatment would be detrimental to a person’s well-being. This may include but is not limited to; (i) emergence of one or more adverse events or laboratory abnormalities that, in the judgment of the Investigator, prevents the person from safely continuing in the study, (ii) intentional loss of adherence for seven consecutive days (including hospitalisation); or (iii) a protocol deviation that results in a significant risk to the person’s safety. Discontinuation of participation may also occur if (i) death; (ii) discharge from the aged care facility; or (iii) withdrawal of consent by the participant.
Withdrawal of consent may be made at any time and for any reason, with details documented. Participants may withdraw consent to (i) no longer participate in the entire study, (ii) not participate in a particular part of the study or aspects of assessments, (iii) not participate in further visits or assessments, or (iv) have any further study related contact. In this case, contact would only be made for safety reasons. In the case of (i) and (iii) study treatment will be discontinued, and no further assessments conducted.
Lost to follow-up
For participants whose status is unclear because they fail to undergo study visits without stating an intention to discontinue, the Investigator will show ‘due diligence’ by documenting steps taken to determine their absence, e.g., view medical records or inquiry through facility staff. A participant should not be considered lost to follow-up until their scheduled end of study visit has occurred. Participants who are discontinued from the study for any reason will not be replaced.
Study completion and post-study treatment
Each participant will be required to complete the study in its entirety. The study will be considered complete when the last participant completes their final visit, and any repeat assessments associated with this visit have been documented and followed up appropriately by the Investigator.
Outcomes
To determine the efficacy of two daily doses of a multi-nutrient supplement on immune, muscle and respiratory function of older adults in residential aged care, the following outcomes will be assessed:
Primary outcome
T-cell subsets CD8+ and CD28null measured at baseline and weeks 4 and 12.
Secondary outcomes
Multiple immunosenescence markers measured at baseline and weeks 4 and 12 (Table 3 and Appendix 2)
Serum vitamin D (25OHD) and albumin, measured at weeks 4 and 12.
SPPB, handgrip strength, body composition (fat and lean mass)
Respiratory function (FEV1, FVC and FEV1/FVC ratio)
QoL and Nursing Home Life-Space Diameter instrument
Statistics
Sample size calculation
Available data on normal levels of T-cell subset CD28null indicated the standard deviation for males and females aged 60-80-year-old is 16% and 21% for those aged 80-100 years.60 A 10% difference in T-cell subset CD28null is considered clinically relevant.60 Assuming a standard deviation of 20%, to detect a 10% difference with 80% power at the 5% significance level, 128 participants will be required. Allowing for 20% attrition, 160 participants (80 per group) are required.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise information collected for each outcome at each time-point. The primary outcome of the study is the comparison of T-cell subsets CD8+ and CD28null at 4 weeks and 24 weeks from baseline, which will be assessed using a generalised linear mixed model adjusted for baseline levels. If the model is of poor fit by visual inspection of residuals, the outcome will be transformed using natural logarithm. If the model fit is still insufficient, non-parametric tests will be used for analysis.
The analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis with additional per-protocol analysis. The extent of missing data will be evaluated. Missing data will be handled within the generalised linear mixed model. Where non-parametric analysis will be performed, complete case analysis will be performed (if missing data is minimal), or simple imputation will be performed. Secondary outcomes will be analysed in a similar manner, using mixed-effects linear regression for continuous outcomes and mixed-effects negative binomial regression for counts. Statistical significance will be assumed at p□<□0.05. No adjustments for multiple comparisons will be made; however secondary outcomes will be interpreted in light of multiple comparisons.
Data Collection and Storage
Data Management, Security and Handling
The Investigators are responsible for ensuring the accuracy, completeness, legibility, and timeliness of data reported. Designated research staff are provided with an individual log-in to enter data required by the protocol into the electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) within a secure electronic password-protected database (REDCap) hosted on a secure server by The University of Melbourne. All data will have an external originating source (either written or electronic). Paper-based source data will be stored in a locked office at AIMSS. Automatic validation syntax set within REDCap will check for data discrepancies and generating appropriate error messages will allow for data to be confirmed or corrected. Participants will be de-identified and given a unique participant number.
Data Sharing
No study data or information will be released to any unauthorised third party without prior written approval by The University of Melbourne. Recipients will treat the data according to the Australian Privacy Principles or similar privacy legislation. The recipients will not use or disclose the information untowardly or outside the parameters of the agreement between them and the Institution (The University of Melbourne). No individual will be identified in reports or publications; only group-level data will be presented.
Participants will only be identified by a unique participant number. The Investigator will maintain a confidential participant identification list that allows the unambiguous identification of each participant. All relevant and applicable laws and guidelines will be applied to any data that is leaving the Institution. After the study is complete, a study summary will be provided to participating facilities and individual participants.
Record Retention
All study documents will be retained for a minimum of 15 years after study completion and will be disposed of in a standard secure manner at the end of the archival period. Only authorised study staff will have access to the data.
DISCUSSION
We aim to determine whether a 12-week multi-nutrient supplement improves immune, muscle and respiratory function in older adults living in aged-care who are at high risk of adverse outcomes due to seasonal influenza and other viral infections such as COVID-19. Older adults, particularly aged-care residents, are prioritised for influenza and COVID-19 vaccinations. However, low immune responses to standard vaccines because of immunosenescence may compromise vaccine effectiveness6,62 Therefore, vaccination efficacy may be improved by priming the immune system of older adults.
The proposed outcome from this work is that multi-nutrient supplementation will improve cellular immunity. Viral infections have several features that make them useful for studying T cell immune responses as the productive infection is localised to lung tissue, and no persisting virus can be detected.63 These features make influenza/COVID-19 infections a good model for studying both the effector and memory phases of T cell response. Multiple studies have tested proliferative responses to in vitro challenges with influenza antigens via examined total T cell proliferation, and it is known that proliferative responses to influenza vaccine are generally higher within CD4 than CD8 T cell subsets.64-66 These data indicate that specific nutritional supplements can enhance T cell proliferative responses to viral challenges. Noteworthy, measuring immune competency in older adults should involve several criteria because immune changes from ageing and malnutrition are similar; nutrient supplementation may improve immune status and clinical outcomes in older adults, 67,68 and at risk of sarcopenia.69 These criteria must include full blood counts, T and B cell counts and their function and subsets (particularly T-cell subsets CD8+, CD28null, Treg, and Dendritic cells), and concentrations of serum interleukins (particularly interleukin (IL) -7).1,9,10,70
As the population ages and the risk of potential pandemics remain, it is reasonable to prepare vulnerable older adults for viral assaults by implementing efficacious evidence-based interventions using specialised nutritional supplements.40,71-74 Nutritional interventions using vitamin D, protein, zinc and selenium enhanced anti-viral resistance against COVID-19 in older adults. 75 Among COVID-19 inpatients (n = 134), 19% of patients in intensive care units had serum 25(OH)D levels above 50 nmol/L compared to 39% of those in conventional medical wards.76 In a randomised placebo-controlled trial involving 38 older adults, vitamin D supplementation (100,000 IU/15 days) promoted a higher TGFβ plasma level (20.8ng/mL) in response to influenza vaccination and directed the lymphocyte polarisation toward a tolerogenic immune response.77 Furthermore, vitamin D has been associated with improved pulmonary function and reduced incidence of airway infections. An RCT of 86 older adults patients showed that consumption of 50,000 IU vitamin D supplementation in a daily diet could increase quality of life and pulmonary function in adult patients.78 Moreover, higher serum vitamin D levels (>50 nmol/L) among adults are associated with decreased odds of obstructive lung disease in the general population.79 In addition, vitamin D supplementation (2000 IU/day) reduced the risk for pneumonia, acute exacerbations of respiratory diseases, and lung function decline in older adults.80 Therefore, vitamin D supplementation may have a beneficial role against viral infections in aged-care residents.
Various studies indicate that older adults require a daily protein intake of 1.0 to 1.2g / kg body weight to support muscle health and function.38,81 In well-controlled and powered RCTs of sarcopenic older adults, supplementation using whey protein enhances muscle mass and function82,83 and prevents mobility impairment.84,85 Our team recently showed in a 2-year clustered-randomised nutrition intervention involving over 7,000 older adults in aged-care that increased dietary protein (from 0.9 to 1.1g/kg body weight) and calcium intakes were associated with maintenance of appendicular muscle mass.50 An in vitro study demonstrated that whey protein has a direct-acting inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 infection and replication.86
CaHMB increases protein synthesis and prevents protein degradation in young and older adults.39,87. CaHMB supplementation contributed to the preservation of muscle mass in older adults and prevention of muscle atrophy induced by bed rest or other factors.88 Supplementation with CaHMB (3g), vitamin D (1000IU) and protein (36g) resulted in faster wound healing, shortening of immobilisation period, and increased muscle strength in older malnourished hip fracture patients.89 A further study involving older hip fracture patients supplemented with CaHMB (2.1g) also observed improved muscle mass and function and prevention of the onset of sarcopenia.90 CaHMB plus amino acid supplementation in older adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reduced viral infection and muscle wasting.91 Findings from a recent umbrella review support the individual effects of the above RCTs by concluding there is high-quality evidence favouring supplementation of HMB (above the recommended daily intake) for increasing muscle mass in older adults.92 Therefore, the provision of CaHMB/vitamin D/protein in older adults with sarcopenia may be a viable option to enhance or preserve muscle mass and function.
Trace elements in the multi-nutrient supplement also contribute to improving immune function. Selenium supplementation (50, 100 or 200 µg/day Se-enriched yeast) of adults with suboptimal status is considered a safe adjuvant therapy against viral infections.93 In older adults, selenium supplement (100μg/day) improves the response to influenza vaccination and is accompanied by increased IFN-γ levels after vaccination.94 Zinc is important for the development and maintenance of cell-mediated immunity95 Zinc deficiency is associated with decreased immune responses with ageing, and improving zinc status can in part reverse immune dysfunction and reduce chronic inflammation associated with ageing.96 In addition, other nutrients, such as vitamins A, B, C and E, essential for T cell function, significantly improve the severity and mortality rate in COVID-19 patients.97
The main purpose of this study is to prepare aged-care residents against viral infections, improve their immune, muscle and respiratory function and quality of life. Therefore, this study may have significant health impacts that are broader than the preparation for or prevention of COVID-19. Outcomes from this study may provide evidence-based clinical care pathways to support scalable and pragmatic aged-care based nutrition support programs that reduce the severity of seasonal influenza or other viral infections.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Pomerium Study will determine the efficacy of a multi-nutrient supplement on immune, muscle and respiratory function and QoL of older adults in aged care. Further outcomes include a reduction in the incidence of COVID-19 and seasonal viral infections and their associated complications in supplemented participants. The study results may support the provision of multi-nutrient supplements to older adults in aged care prior to and during viral outbreaks as a strategy to reduce the onset and severity of viral infections.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
DECLARATIONS
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee (Ref No. HREC/73985/MH-2021, ERM Ref No. RMH73985, Melbourne Health Site Ref No. 2021.115).
Consent for publication
All the authors have consented to publish this protocol.
Availability of data and material
Future datasets generated and/or analysed during the study will not be publicly available due privacy issues but will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
GD and SI serve as members of the Advisory Board of Abbott Australia. GD serves on the Scientific Advisory Board at TSI Pharmaceuticals. BK is currently supported by a research fellowship from TSI Pharmaceuticals. All the other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding
This study was funded by a grant from the 2020 Rare Cancers Rare Diseases and Unmet Need – COVID-19 grants program by the Australian Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF).
Sponsor
Western Health (Melbourne, Australia)
Role of study sponsor and funder
The sponsor and funder agency will not play any role in study design; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or the decision to submit the report for publication.
Author contributions
GD conceived the trial and is the Chief Investigator in the MRFF grant. All authors participated in the design of the trial and read and approved the final manuscript.
Footnotes
e-mail addresses:
Ahmed Al Saedi – ahmed.mohan{at}unimelb.edu.au
Ben Kirk – ben.kirk{at}unimelb.edu.au
Sandra Iuliano – sandraib{at}unimelb.edu.au
Jesse Zanker – jesse.zanker{at}unimelb.edu.au
Sara Vogrin – sara.vogrin{at}unimelb.edu.au
Lata Jayaram – lata.jayaram{at}unimelb.edu.au
Shane Thomas – shane.thomas{at}optusnet.com.au
Christine Golding – christine.golding62{at}bigpond.com
Diana Navarro-Perez – d.navarroperez{at}unimelb.edu.au
Petra Marusic – petra.marusic{at}unimelb.edu.au
Sean Leng – sleng1{at}jhmi.edu
Ralph Nanan – ralph.nanan{at}sydney.edu.au
Gustavo Duque – gustavo.duque{at}unimelb.edu.au
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.
- 6.↵
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- 14.↵
- 15.
- 16.↵
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- 26.↵
- 27.↵
- 28.↵
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.↵
- 32.↵
- 33.↵
- 34.↵
- 35.↵
- 36.↵
- 37.↵
- 38.↵
- 39.↵
- 40.↵
- 41.↵
- 42.↵
- 43.↵
- 44.↵
- 45.↵
- 46.↵
- 47.↵
- 48.↵
- 49.↵
- 50.↵
- 51.↵
- 52.↵
- 53.↵
- 54.↵
- 55.↵
- 56.↵
- 57.↵
- 58.↵
- 59.↵
- 60.↵
- 61.↵
- 62.↵
- 63.↵
- 64.↵
- 65.
- 66.↵
- 67.↵
- 68.↵
- 69.↵
- 70.↵
- 71.↵
- 72.
- 73.
- 74.↵
- 75.↵
- 76.↵
- 77.↵
- 78.↵
- 79.↵
- 80.↵
- 81.↵
- 82.↵
- 83.↵
- 84.↵
- 85.↵
- 86.↵
- 87.↵
- 88.↵
- 89.↵
- 90.↵
- 91.↵
- 92.↵
- 93.↵
- 94.↵
- 95.↵
- 96.↵
- 97.↵